Anyone else rethinking exit rows after the MAX 9 incident?
#1
Original Poster




Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 1,316
Anyone else rethinking exit rows after the MAX 9 incident?
Ever since the Alaska 737 MAX 9 incident, I have found myself having an emotional reaction to my normal seat-of-choice, the exit row window (21A or 21F on UA). Has anyone else noticed this? It could be on several levels:
Anyone else?
(I had mentioned this very early on the United 737 MAX 9 thread, but I realize this is an issue bigger and not specific to United, so posted here.)
- 737 MAX 9 - albeit mitigated by specific inspections
- 737-900 - same body (and plug door) as the MAX 9 with a much longer track records of no incidents, but questions about design give me pause
- Any 737 MAX - thinking about overall Boeing manufacturing and QC
- Any plane - as rare/unlikely as this is, window seats next to a door are not where you would want to be!
Anyone else?
(I had mentioned this very early on the United 737 MAX 9 thread, but I realize this is an issue bigger and not specific to United, so posted here.)
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Southern Ontario
Programs: Aeroplan, NEXUS
Posts: 1,026
Nope. The percentage odds on the door or a plug blowing out while I'm in the seat are infinitesimal. The odds on me having more legroom sitting in an exit row are 100 percent.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wanting First. Buying First.
Programs: Lifetime Executive Diamond Platinum VIP with Braniff, Eastern, Midway, National & Pan Am
Posts: 22,011
The number of people killed by doors blowing out or peeling off (UA811) or shrapnel from uncontained engine failures penetrating the fuselage is dwarfed by the number of people who survived quick emergency evacuations of burning aircraft.
#4
Original Poster




Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 1,316
Not to mention the fact that it's slightly less infinitesimal that you might wind up in a burning aircraft on the ground. Knowing that no one is between me and the emergency exit is peace of mind.
The number of people killed by doors blowing out or peeling off (UA811) or shrapnel from uncontained engine failures penetrating the fuselage is dwarfed by the number of people who survived quick emergency evacuations of burning aircraft.
The number of people killed by doors blowing out or peeling off (UA811) or shrapnel from uncontained engine failures penetrating the fuselage is dwarfed by the number of people who survived quick emergency evacuations of burning aircraft.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 22,926
Anyone else rethinking exit rows after the MAX 9 incident?
Been millions of flights with people sitting beside an exit row emergency door.
#6




Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: midwest
Programs: DL Gold (after 11 yrs at PM)
Posts: 949
Just booked exit row on a 737-900. It's just not a worry at all. Now, would I sit in row 29 or 30 on Delta's 737-900? No, but that's because their -900 economy section has awful legroom, and the plug at those rows messes up the window spacing to boot.
That said, I hold some thin reed of hope that Boeing has so screwed up the Max10 certification timeline that Delta gives up on their disappointing order of 100 copies (UA has publicly said that have no confidence of a timeline for delivery of theirs). The Max10 I expect to be another uncomfortable sardine can.
That said, I hold some thin reed of hope that Boeing has so screwed up the Max10 certification timeline that Delta gives up on their disappointing order of 100 copies (UA has publicly said that have no confidence of a timeline for delivery of theirs). The Max10 I expect to be another uncomfortable sardine can.
#7



Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,713
Most exit doors are designed so that the cabin pressure forces them to stay closed, so they cannot possibly "blow out." The plugs were designed with cost savings in mind, which is why they did not bother engineering such a safety feature into them. No way I'm passing up on extra leg room for the infinitesimal chance of an incident. While it seems like this fact gets beaten to death, it is worth repeating: you are exponentially more likely to be involved in an accident on the way to/from the airport than on an actual plane.
#8



Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PHX, SEA
Programs: Alaska MVP, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 4,511
The door plug exists to close off an exit not being used even in the case of emergency. The functioning emergency exits weren't part of the defect, grounding, or inspection. So no, It wouldn't remotely cross my mind to avoid the exit row.
#9




Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 5,017
The OP is conflating an emergency exit, which as noted is pressure positive from the interior and one knows where it is located with a door plug which is fixed into place and cannot be opened. Further while a door plug can be seen from the exterior, it can not be seen from the interior. Finally, depending on the aircraft and just like all aircraft exits, the location relative to seat row varies.
So to answer the OP question, no because the two are not related.
I should add that door plugs are designed for aircraft customization. Some buyers will order the plane to hold X passengers. If X is above a certain limit then additional exits are required. If X is below the limit then few exits are required. From an engineering perspective door plugs are fixed into place and for manufacturing it is easier to have them installed from the outside. As such, are not self sealing. From what I have learned the bolts used have wire tie heads. For the bolts to come out this step would have been missed. However, it sounds as though there were no bolts.
So to answer the OP question, no because the two are not related.
I should add that door plugs are designed for aircraft customization. Some buyers will order the plane to hold X passengers. If X is above a certain limit then additional exits are required. If X is below the limit then few exits are required. From an engineering perspective door plugs are fixed into place and for manufacturing it is easier to have them installed from the outside. As such, are not self sealing. From what I have learned the bolts used have wire tie heads. For the bolts to come out this step would have been missed. However, it sounds as though there were no bolts.
Last edited by FlyingUnderTheRadar; Jan 28, 2024 at 12:25 pm
#10

Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 97
#11
Original Poster




Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 1,316
Most exit doors are designed so that the cabin pressure forces them to stay closed, so they cannot possibly "blow out." The plugs were designed with cost savings in mind, which is why they did not bother engineering such a safety feature into them. No way I'm passing up on extra leg room for the infinitesimal chance of an incident. While it seems like this fact gets beaten to death, it is worth repeating: you are exponentially more likely to be involved in an accident on the way to/from the airport than on an actual plane.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 53,012
No worry at all about safety. But I don't particularly like exit row window seats. They are often cold, sometimes narrow, sometimes have less leg space because of the door, and sometimes missing an armrest.
Exit row aisle? Zero hesitancy booking that at all.
Exit row aisle? Zero hesitancy booking that at all.
#13




Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NYC suburbs
Programs: UA LT Gold 1.2MM (BIS), AA LT Plat (SUBs, BD/Bask), Hilton Dia (CC), Hyatt Glob (BIB), et. al.
Posts: 4,601
… it's slightly less infinitesimal that you might wind up in a burning aircraft on the ground. Knowing that no one is between me and the emergency exit is peace of mind. The number of people killed by doors blowing out or peeling off (UA811) or shrapnel from uncontained engine failures penetrating the fuselage is dwarfed by the number of people who survived quick emergency evacuations of burning aircraft.
… exit doors are designed so that the cabin pressure forces them to stay closed, so they cannot possibly "blow out." The plugs were designed with cost savings in mind, … you are exponentially more likely to be involved in an accident on the way to/from the airport than on an actual plane.
The debate as to the safest seat (location) on an airplane is never ending, some crashes the front is safest, some crashes back is safest, some the middle. However, what’s not debatable is that the vast majority of crash survivors get out of the wreck THEMSELVES without assistance, few survivors have been pulled or carried out by another person (passenger OR bystander OR first responder). Thus, proximity to an exit (emergency or otherwise) is important.
Additionally, many (aircraft) interior materials produce toxic fumes when burning, another reason to get out ASAP.
Also, slightly lower possibility of a POS (person of size) in the adjacent seat spilling into exit row seat space. Unfortunately many flight attendants ignore the fact that most obese people are not able to quickly get up (or out) from an airplane seat and thus marginally (if at all) able to assist and would instead become obstacles.
Only for a millisecond, it’s still far and away the safest and most comfortable economy seat on almost every commercial airplane.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 24
If you're buckled in, you should be ok. I think the difficulty would be breathing because your oxygen mask would be hard to keep on with all the random loose objects flying by you out the open door, possibly snagging the tubing. But yeah... highly unlikely that it would happen again.

