![]() |
Originally Posted by TBD
(Post 30509410)
...because there were 63 reports of in-flight assault out of something like 850 million passengers in 2017?
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 30510437)
India too.
|
Originally Posted by Annalisa12
(Post 30511248)
Do people disagree with the security check lines for women only in the middle east?
Given the airport pat-down security culture in many parts of the world -- including in the US -- there seems to be something about generally wanting people subject to same-sex screeners doing the pat-downs. This is why most airports in the US have TSA trying to keep at least one female TSA screener assigned at all/most all screening checkpoint operating hours. |
Originally Posted by 84fiero
(Post 30510424)
Japan also has some women-only train/metro cards...I know I've heard of some other places, too, but can't think of them offhand.
|
I would like it providing the lavs are separated too. Men complete their bodily functions faster than women and don't hog the facilities to apply makeup, fuss with their hair or change into their PJs on a long haul.
The problem however would be the overhead bins. Rarely is there a flight where there isn't at least one weak/short woman who cant get her bag into the overhead. I have yet to see a weak woman ask another woman for help. Instead they impose on some tall and robust man to help them. If we aren't nearby whatever will the ladies do? ;) |
Originally Posted by vanillabean
(Post 30509319)
Journalist claims... |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 30511915)
This is why most airports in the US have TSA trying to keep at least one female TSA screener assigned at all/most all screening checkpoint operating hours.
I think it's similar in many countries that a woman has a right to a female screener. That also goes for body searches by the police. |
Originally Posted by 1flyer
(Post 30512402)
I believe in Germany, there is a law that gives you the right to a same-sex screener. So there are always male and female screeners around.
I think it's similar in many countries that a woman has a right to a female screener. That also goes for body searches by the police.
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 30512309)
I would like it providing the lavs are separated too. Men complete their bodily functions faster than women and don't hog the facilities to apply makeup, fuss with their hair or change into their PJs on a long haul.
The problem however would be the overhead bins. Rarely is there a flight where there isn't at least one weak/short woman who cant get her bag into the overhead. I have yet to see a weak woman ask another woman for help. Instead they impose on some tall and robust man to help them. If we aren't nearby whatever will the ladies do? ;) |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 30512797)
I see some older women asking younger women for help with overhead bags. I also see some women asking other women for help with overhead bags when they are carrying a lot of stuff along with one or more young child.
You do however outline a couple of other distinct benefits of having the women in the back. Fewer kids and more room in the overhead bins for us. Women tend to be among the worst offenders for too much stuff -- carry-on, personal item, monster purse, huge duty free bag. And further away from squalling infants is always better. Instead of dad having to help mom with a crying baby he can order another beer and relax. :D |
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 30512841)
I've been asked to help lift a bag and always do. Not one woman has ever asked my wife if she's traveling with me. They ask me.
You do however outline a couple of other distinct benefits of having the women in the back. Fewer kids and more room in the overhead bins for us. Women tend to be among the worst offenders for too much stuff -- carry-on, personal item, monster purse, huge duty free bag. And further away from squalling infants is always better. Instead of dad having to help mom with a crying baby he can order another beer and relax. :D |
Life can certainly suck for women, but undeniably in the Western world they have a number of concessions that are not available to males.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 30512857)
I've seen more dads traveling alone with young kids on my flights this month than I've seen moms doing that, so don't count on the "men's section" being "child-free". This ain't the premium cabin of say MH or whichever other airline has tried that kind of ban. :D
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 30512797)
I recall some male FTer claiming they liked the option of having their pat-down done by female screeners at CPH (and perhaps some other Nordic/Scandinavian country airports). But I don't find many opposite-sex pat-downs going on in this area either, even as I've seen some of course.
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 30512841)
And further away from squalling infants is always better. Instead of dad having to help mom with a crying baby he can order another beer and relax. :D
|
Originally Posted by vanillabean
(Post 30513099)
A common cheerful statement among repressed Scandinavian husbands with their wives as the intended audience! |
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 30512841)
<snip> Women tend to be among the worst offenders for too much stuff -- carry-on, personal item, monster purse, huge duty free bag. <snip> :D
Comparing individual to individual, maybe. Maybe But on the average flight I find myself on, the worst offenders are the "businessmen", who pack on a full size rollaboard, briefcase/backpack, CPAP, and a suit jacket or raincoat, and then fill up a whole bin with their stuff, barely leaving enough room to close the door around their frequent traveler "brag tags". I bet the ratio of men like that to the women that you describe is easily 10:1 |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.