If overhead bins didn't exist, would you still travel via airplane?
Sep 21, 2018, 10:15 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,656
If overhead bins didn't exist, would you still travel via airplane?
In a response I made in a UA thread made me think about behavior. If overhead bins were removed, would you adapt, or find other ways of traveling?
I would adapt without issue, but I'm curious of what others think.
I would adapt without issue, but I'm curious of what others think.
Sep 21, 2018, 10:21 am
#2
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: WAS
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 1,757
The question strikes me as more than a little absurd. Checked bags still exist, do you think someone would rather spend a few weeks/months on a boat crossing an ocean than fly without an overhead-bin sized carry-on?
Sep 21, 2018, 10:34 am
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,656
I'm liking the idea of forced checked bags, period, beyond your normal personal carry on that fits below the seat in front of you. Eliminates the who boards first issue, and eliminates the bins that open with a little turbulence.
Sep 21, 2018, 10:48 am
#5
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
Wouldn't be an issue for me. I much prefer to check a bag and have to carry only a small bag through the airport and onto the plane.
Sep 21, 2018, 10:53 am
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,656
We (myself included) act like we cannot live without not just our computer bag at hand, but our roller board full of clothes. Some how I think we would survive just fine.
Sep 21, 2018, 12:23 pm
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,775
It wasn't that long ago -- not the coat/hat era by any means, just a few years -- that I was on a plane with no overhead bins. That's because it was a B1900. We survived.
I think it's ridiculous how much stuff people bring on a plane. Southwest has no checked bag fees, yet people bring everything they own with them on the plane anyway. Checked bag fees are clearly irrelevant. They're afraid of the 1 in 1000 chance the airline will lose their cheap Wal-Mart clothes, they want to run out of the airport as fast as possible, and they don't care that they are making the boarding process take TWICE as long.
I think it's ridiculous how much stuff people bring on a plane. Southwest has no checked bag fees, yet people bring everything they own with them on the plane anyway. Checked bag fees are clearly irrelevant. They're afraid of the 1 in 1000 chance the airline will lose their cheap Wal-Mart clothes, they want to run out of the airport as fast as possible, and they don't care that they are making the boarding process take TWICE as long.
Sep 21, 2018, 12:33 pm
#10
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
What were the average load factors? How many passengers (and bags) on an average flight?
How would today's airport infrastructure handle that number of bags and today's number of passenger who would have to check and claim them? I don't think that this would improve the overall travel experience.
How would today's airport infrastructure handle that number of bags and today's number of passenger who would have to check and claim them? I don't think that this would improve the overall travel experience.
Sep 21, 2018, 1:30 pm
#11
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The 707 seated 140-219 passengers depending on configuration.
Interestingly, without meaningful carry-on one can board the aircraft in 15-20 minutes. So, have to figure in much better gate utilization too.
Interestingly, without meaningful carry-on one can board the aircraft in 15-20 minutes. So, have to figure in much better gate utilization too.
Sep 21, 2018, 1:46 pm
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17,455
It wasn't that long ago -- not the coat/hat era by any means, just a few years -- that I was on a plane with no overhead bins. That's because it was a B1900. We survived.
I think it's ridiculous how much stuff people bring on a plane. Southwest has no checked bag fees, yet people bring everything they own with them on the plane anyway. Checked bag fees are clearly irrelevant. They're afraid of the 1 in 1000 chance the airline will lose their cheap Wal-Mart clothes, they want to run out of the airport as fast as possible, and they don't care that they are making the boarding process take TWICE as long.
I think it's ridiculous how much stuff people bring on a plane. Southwest has no checked bag fees, yet people bring everything they own with them on the plane anyway. Checked bag fees are clearly irrelevant. They're afraid of the 1 in 1000 chance the airline will lose their cheap Wal-Mart clothes, they want to run out of the airport as fast as possible, and they don't care that they are making the boarding process take TWICE as long.
Sep 21, 2018, 2:00 pm
#14
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,656
Out of the 1,000's of flights I have taken with checked bags, two are it for my bag not making it. I often travel with not only a roller board, but a checked bag full of gear for my job. After realizing nothing ever happens to my checked bag with $30K value in gear, I'm pretty sure my clothes and toiletries will do just fine.
Sep 21, 2018, 2:02 pm
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 21,024