![]() |
Refund = refund your boss?
Deleted
|
Originally Posted by superangrypenguin
(Post 25935312)
My employer has told me to keep the $. So I keep it. Ethical issues solved.
(I just caught up reading this thread) |
One of the oldest and most twisted games in the book for business travel by air was done by those flying for government work. A number of diplomats, for example, would swap their flexible or premium cabin tickets for lower cost air travel and pocket the difference/refund for their own personal use/enrichment.
At the same time, some of their governmental employers would throw a hissy fit if government contractors would get creative to save the government money by getting even a little bit creative to drive down the costs. |
Originally Posted by pinniped
(Post 25935396)
Now we need 270 posts about the ethics of your boss's decision. @:-)
|
Originally Posted by MaxBuck
(Post 25934963)
They call it "business class" for a reason.
Coach fares are far lower today than they've been in the past, inflation-adjusted. And coach travel has consequently evolved into cattle car conditions. It's unreasonable IMO to expect business travelers to suffer with those conditions on long-haul routes. If you choose to refer to this as "entitlement," so be it, but I continue to regard it as a reasonable expectation. Though I'm self-employed, I will insist upon J class reimbursement for any international travel my clients require of me. And I see nothing unethical or unreasonable about that. |
Originally Posted by superangrypenguin
(Post 25935528)
I realize this is slightly off topic, but very very few employers that I know of, outside of government, allow for J/F travel. IBM is lowest fare. Google is dependent on route. MS is Y only. Oracle, last I checked is highest Y, as an example, and these are the highly profitable companies.
|
Originally Posted by superangrypenguin
(Post 25935507)
Ok I LOLd. Well, not so much my boss's decision but company policy. In my case, I will have, assuming this is an IRROP, gotten a choice. Fly in J/F or fly in Y with $. I can accept either. Why? I've never asked, but presumably it's because I have to "suffer" in Y, so as a result I get comped for it. I also don't HAVE to suffer in Y and can accept J/F on a later flight.
I say it's an ethical issue because in practice, the IRS is never going to know about one random IROP. The NBA refs had a system...they were doing it intentionally and frequently. But if you were to *ask* the IRS, I think they'd say it's taxable income... (Again, IAtotallyNAL.) If the ticket was flown as-is with a Y seat assignment and some sort of downgrade kit (vouchers or miles or whatever), then it's a nonissue. |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 25935564)
Governments aren't all that generous in providing premium cabin travel to government employees. For most government employees in the world, it's just economy class travel.
Originally Posted by pinniped
(Post 25935617)
The only potential lingering ethical issue *might* be between you and the IRS, assuming you're in the U.S. If the compensation came to you as a result of reticketing into a Y fare bucket, that cash you kept *could* be reportable income. IANAL, but this is what the NBA referees got in trouble for. It wasn't the NBA commish who cared so much as it was the IRS.
I say it's an ethical issue because in practice, the IRS is never going to know about one random IROP. The NBA refs had a system...they were doing it intentionally and frequently. But if you were to *ask* the IRS, I think they'd say it's taxable income... (Again, IAtotallyNAL.) If the ticket was flown as-is with a Y seat assignment and some sort of downgrade kit (vouchers or miles or whatever), then it's a nonissue. I know our Swedish division, as an example, have to pay taxes on even frequent flier miles, but no, I live in Canada and we do not have to pay for what you suggest. -IRROP comp. (based on what HR has told me) I am not sure at all about US taxation laws. |
I can't be alone in thinking that this entire two-way argument hasn't contributed anything to this thread.
|
Originally Posted by superangrypenguin
(Post 25935528)
I realize this is slightly off topic, but very very few employers that I know of, outside of government, allow for J/F travel. IBM is lowest fare. Google is dependent on route. MS is Y only. Oracle, last I checked is highest Y, as an example, and these are the highly profitable companies.
|
Originally Posted by TMM1982
(Post 25936104)
I'm pretty sure that depends on the employee's position. MS may be Y but I suspect Bill Gates was not flying Y to China.
|
Originally Posted by pinniped
(Post 25936137)
Some CEOs make a point to fly Y.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 25935416)
One of the oldest and most twisted games in the book for business travel by air was done by those flying for government work. A number of diplomats, for example, would swap their flexible or premium cabin tickets for lower cost air travel and pocket the difference/refund for their own personal use/enrichment.
At the same time, some of their governmental employers would throw a hissy fit if government contractors would get creative to save the government money by getting even a little bit creative to drive down the costs. |
Originally Posted by pinniped
(Post 25936137)
Some CEOs make a point to fly Y. Not sure if Gates was one or not...
Originally Posted by TMM1982
(Post 25936104)
I'm pretty sure that depends on the employee's position. MS may be Y but I suspect Bill Gates was not flying Y to China.
|
Originally Posted by superangrypenguin
(Post 25935528)
I realize this is slightly off topic, but very very few employers that I know of, outside of government, allow for J/F travel. IBM is lowest fare. Google is dependent on route. MS is Y only. Oracle, last I checked is highest Y, as an example, and these are the highly profitable companies.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:29 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.