FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   Soarigami (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/1635594-soarigami.html)

Taiwaned Dec 9, 2014 12:07 pm

Soarigami
 
What do you all think of this?

And the ad IS annoying

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/12/08/tr...ami/index.html

CDKing Dec 9, 2014 12:58 pm

It may reduce seat width. I don't want that thing jamming me in the side.

zitsky Dec 9, 2014 1:14 pm


Originally Posted by CDKing (Post 23968903)
It may reduce seat width. I don't want that thing jamming me in the side.

Same concern. Will it really be comfortable?

dhuey Dec 9, 2014 1:55 pm

Territorial issues aside, it might be more comfortable for everyone. You could let your elbow/forearm push up against the barrier.

WaxComb Dec 9, 2014 3:09 pm

If the layout is 3 abreast then that device is useless since middles should always have both armrests.

jabbered Dec 9, 2014 3:11 pm


Originally Posted by WaxComb (Post 23969733)
If the layout is 3 abreast then that device is useless since middles should always have both armrests.

Why do you say that?

nkedel Dec 9, 2014 3:31 pm


Originally Posted by jabbered (Post 23969744)
Why do you say that?

Because someone once asserted it on here, and some people liked it enough to repeat it. It's got no basis in fact; the armrests are a free-for-all.

As for the soragami, if it protrudes out into the seat well itself on the other side, I doubt it will be welcome. That said, the basic idea is kind of sound -- a few times when I've hit "leaners" at shoulder level, or folks who are over-assertive in taking the entire armrest, I've found a copy of the inevitable in-flight magazine handy to shove between them and me.

WaxComb Dec 9, 2014 3:34 pm

I always let the middle have my arm rest because they have the worst seat and I'm not a jerk.

MojaveFlyer Dec 9, 2014 3:59 pm

I am fairly "wide". If the thing doesn't break as I sit down and squeeze into my seat, it might be great. If it does break, not my problem.

EricH Dec 9, 2014 4:22 pm

According to their ad, this addresses the least significant annoyance in flying. I think they need a new approach to marketing their invention.

mgarrett96 Dec 9, 2014 4:41 pm

Looks pretty uncomfortable...

weero Dec 10, 2014 6:58 pm


Originally Posted by mgarrett96 (Post 23970344)
Looks pretty uncomfortable...

Doesn't solve anything ... without it two people can actually use the armrest - one front one aft - with that thing, it is pretty useless to anyone.

I'd also not tolerate a device that overlaps into my seat space.

Originally Posted by WaxComb (Post 23969890)
I always let the middle have my arm rest because they have the worst seat and I'm not a jerk.

No comments on the character of posters!

Imaging if someone asserts the opposite based on your statement...

Doc Savage Dec 10, 2014 7:23 pm

These seem silly in these days of ever narrowing seats...

WaxComb Dec 11, 2014 1:43 am


Originally Posted by weero (Post 23977065)
Imaging if someone asserts the opposite based on your statement...

Never had a problem. If I'm in the window or aisle I give up an arm rest. If I'm in the middle I take whatever was given to me (be it 2, 1 or 0).

Like I said, I'm not a jerk. (No comment on anybody in this thread or on this board, but asserting a standard and not being courteous in my opinion is being a jerk.)

Ross0 Jan 10, 2015 9:57 am

Could be an interesting device and if its comfortable, I'm all for it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.