![]() |
Originally Posted by exbayern
(Post 21653252)
But then I am not surprised to see some people calling others rude for not meeting their own rigid standard of what they consider acceptable behaviour. It's not up to one passenger to decide if others are more or less 'worthy' of having certain seats.
The more they openly criticize complete strangers in public the odds increase they will deservedly get smacked in the mouth by someone who takes offense. No one else will particularly care when it happens. |
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 21655255)
It doesn't surprise me either. There are silly people in this world who brimming with self-righteous indignation appoint themselves as the moral arbiters of everyone else's behavior. Part of their need is to brag about it.
The more they openly criticize complete strangers in public the odds increase they will deservedly get smacked in the mouth by someone who takes offense. No one else will particularly care when it happens. |
Originally Posted by Pulley
(Post 21653871)
How in the world is my wife & I sitting in aisle seats inconsiderate of others (as you stated in an earlier post)? She reads her book and I read mine. The "solo" traveler cannot make better use of the aisle seat - we both use it same way.
Originally Posted by exbayern
(Post 21653252)
I cannot believe that you consider someone with a cast on their arm 'handicapped'.
|
Originally Posted by cbn42
(Post 21658914)
I (and someone else) already explained that. If one has to sit in a middle seat, it is more comfortable to have a companion on one side than strangers on both sides.
There's no way we think sitting between someone you know and a stranger is more comfortable than sitting between an aisle and a stranger. Maybe it's different if you're with someone you like cuddling with during a flight; I don't cuddle with my traveling companions on flights. |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 21659556)
There's no way we think sitting between someone you know and a stranger is more comfortable than sitting between an aisle and a stranger.
|
Originally Posted by cbn42
(Post 21659701)
I didn't say that. Please read my post carefully. I said that sitting between someone you know and a stranger is more comfortable than sitting between two strangers.
Why should we be expected to use the middle seat which neither of us wants when we can choose window/ aisle or aisle/ aisle? Neither of us is so bothered about sitting together that we would choose a middle seat over a window or an aisle, and we wouldnt be so rude as to talk over the bod in the middle, or continually pass stuff back and forth. |
My wife and I often sit across from each other. It's not like we hold hands across the aisle and demand a password to let people pass.
But then, just as often, we sit aisle/middle or window/middle. |
Originally Posted by cbn42
(Post 21641378)
Related question:
What if it's a small plane with only 3 seats across, A to the left of the aisle and BC to the right? Are couples expected to take BC, or is it appropriate for them to take AB? It's one of those "greatest good for the greatest number" type of things. If the row is A - B C, and a couple sits in A and B, and single traveller in C, you end up with two people sitting next to a stranger. Whereas if the couple sits in B and C, you get no-one sitting next to a stranger. Worse yet, if a couple takes A and A behind, and there are enough single travellers on board, you can get up to 4 people sitting next to a stranger. How many people are affected depends on the ratio of singles to couples, but it does get frustrating if you have to sit next to a stranger because two people who wouldn't mind sitting next to each, don't. And yes, I know, they could be two unrelated people, and you'd be in the exact same situation, but stlll... |
Originally Posted by cbn42
(Post 21658914)
I (and someone else) already explained that. If one has to sit in a middle seat, it is more comfortable to have a companion on one side than strangers on both sides.
|
Originally Posted by ceejay_za
(Post 21660282)
I find this happening on tour buses - and yes, as a single traveller I find it annoying (although not enough to say anything, or get upset over). A short flight would bother me less, but on a tour bus you generally keep your place for the whole day.
It's one of those "greatest good for the greatest number" type of things. If the row is A - B C, and a couple sits in A and B, and single traveller in C, you end up with two people sitting next to a stranger. Whereas if the couple sits in B and C, you get no-one sitting next to a stranger. Worse yet, if a couple takes A and A behind, and there are enough single travellers on board, you can get up to 4 people sitting next to a stranger. How many people are affected depends on the ratio of singles to couples, but it does get frustrating if you have to sit next to a stranger because two people who wouldn't mind sitting next to each, don't. And yes, I know, they could be two unrelated people, and you'd be in the exact same situation, but stlll... |
Originally Posted by Pulley
I agree - that is why we leave the window and middle seat available!
|
Big of you |
Originally Posted by Jenbel
(Post 21661198)
Big of you :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by mandolino
(Post 21661538)
I sit on the aisle and have both my wives in the middle and window. That's big o'me.
I prefer window but never get it.. I need to sit by my kids. |
Originally Posted by cbn42
(Post 21659701)
I didn't say that. Please read my post carefully. I said that sitting between someone you know and a stranger is more comfortable than sitting between two strangers.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:08 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.