![]() |
Originally Posted by maize&blue
(Post 18260882)
Throwback in a good way ... SBA.
No jetways as well. Great airport. |
Throwback in a good way is BUR. The layout of the airport and distance between terminal and runway has never changed so if you are into plane spotting-up close and personal, this is the airport for you. :D
Also, I still love boarding and exiting planes via stairs. That's all they have in BUR, no jet bridges. Ironically though, if you look through history, BUR claims to be the first airport in the US to implement jet bridges in their own way, which was essentially a telescopic covered walkway that connected a plane to the terminal. |
Originally Posted by tonywestsider
(Post 18265245)
Throwback in a good way is BUR. The layout of the airport and distance between terminal and runway has never changed so if you are into plane spotting-up close and personal, this is the airport for you. :D
Originally Posted by tonywestsider
(Post 18265245)
Also, I still love boarding and exiting planes via stairs.
|
I liked Tegel. I liked the short walk from the bus stop outside to security, and the fact that there's one checkpoint for every few gates, so you don't have another long walk after clearing security. When landing, customs and border control is practically right there at the gate. And again, another short walk out of the airport. It might feel like an old airport, but it was very traveler friendly. I'll miss it.
|
Originally Posted by lancebanyon
(Post 18267655)
Maybe it's a SoCal thing? I've heard CLD is a nice airport also, never been though.
You should move to Europe - I would guess half of the airports I fly in and out of I have to exit via stairs, including FRA most of the time. Yes, I've been through many airports (and train stations) in Europe. Somehow, European operations don't really have the same appeal as someplace like BUR. In Europe for example, you are using stairs to get in and out of planes because the plane has parked outside the terminal area and you are then bussed to/from the terminal. The bus part kills the whole experience. At least in BUR, you can walk from the terminal to the plane. I love boarding/exiting from the rear of the plane at BUR because you get to pass under the wing of the plane on your walk. You can't really do that at a European airport because the bus picks you up or drops you off right at the stairway so you miss all the experience of seeing the exterior of the plane via walking since you are justing walking from the stair to the bus. |
Originally Posted by lancebanyon
(Post 18250630)
Not sure if throwback is the right term, maybe un-modern, outdated, or old fashioned is better, but anyway, as I was passing through Berlin Tegel (TXL) yesterday (for the first time ever) I thought to myself, you've got to be kidding - for a major city in this day and time, this is, unbelievable..
With about 1 million people less in the metropolitan area, MCI is actually very similar in design to TXL, and there are no plans of which I am aware to tear it down and replace it with something else. I liked Tegel. I liked the short walk from the bus stop outside to security, and the fact that there's one checkpoint for every few gates, so you don't have another long walk after clearing security. When landing, customs and border control is practically right there at the gate. And again, another short walk out of the airport. It might feel like an old airport, but it was very traveler friendly. I'll miss it. Parts of LGA and EWR are far worse to me than TXL.
Originally Posted by lancebanyon
(Post 18267655)
You should move to Europe - I would guess half of the airports I fly in and out of I have to exit via stairs, including FRA most of the time.
And stairs are not unique to Europe. They are used in much of Asia as well. In fact, Canada uses them too. My first trips to YYT were definitely all stair boarding. |
Did the tarmac plus bus ride thing in FRA
Once was enough. Especially with a 747. LOL
|
The Marine Air Terminal, also in a good way
|
Originally Posted by hoyateach
(Post 18260756)
DCA Terminal A. Hasn't changed in at least 20 years, probably longer. And this is the airport that, to many, represents our nation's capital.
The one airport I've most noticed is KTM because it's a loooooonnnnngggg way down the airstairs from a 777 |
Originally Posted by exbayern
(Post 18271473)
And stairs are not unique to Europe. They are used in much of Asia as well. In fact, Canada uses them too. My first trips to YYT were definitely all stair boarding.
To be fair it was more than just stairs though. But still a bus gate. |
Originally Posted by exbayern
(Post 18271473)
With about 1 million people less in the metropolitan area, MCI is actually very similar in design to TXL, and there are no plans of which I am aware to tear it down and replace it with something else.
MCI benefits of course from the fact that there are only a handful of international flights. I'll be flying there on Wednesday and if UA cooperates I'll have my bags and be on my way within about 15 minutes of landing. |
But to me, MCI IS far worse. There was one doughnut counter open past security, and that was IT. There was one small, dirty bathroom. The security is contract, not TSA, and for those wearing a skirt it makes it worse (they have confirmed to me multiple times that they are obliged to hand check ALL travellers with skirts, even though TSA does not even do that)
I have waited much longer for bags at MCI even on a relatively quiet night than at TXL. Overall, my experiences at TXL were positive, as they have been for at least one other poster. Yes, the airport may be old, and of a cobbled together design, but there is a very valid reason for this. At MCI there is little to no way to change the gate screening set up and there is probably not going to be a change in the near future. Combine that with the screening experiences I have had there, lack of food post-security, relatively long baggage wait times, and the fact that it won't be changing in the near future, and I still give TXL higher marks. When we compare transportation and access, TXL still wins in my rating scale. |
Originally Posted by exbayern
(Post 18275470)
But to me, MCI IS far worse. There was one doughnut counter open past security, and that was IT. There was one small, dirty bathroom.
|
In the end, this is really one of those subjective threads where there is no one answer; we all have our triggers and our individual priorities. :)
IF I know that a replacement airport is being built, I may give an airport somewhat of a pass. It didn't make my experiences at old DEL much easier, but I just kept hoping that the future would be better (it is). Same for when I was sitting in 'old' München-Riem with missing ceiling tiles, no air conditioning, and water dripping on my head. That's why however I don't give EWR and LGA a pass, although I think that there too it depends on the terminal. STL is another one which I recall was an airport living in the past. |
Left from JOG this morning. OMFG!
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.