Is "XD" digital camera memory worth paying more for? Interchangeable? Price deals?
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Paso, TX, USA
Programs: Kicked out of all of them
Posts: 32,554
In case someone is still looking, Dell has a 512MB for $78
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/p...9&sku=A0366410
Then again, I got a 1GB CF for less than that
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/p...9&sku=A0366410
Then again, I got a 1GB CF for less than that
#17
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PHX/SFO/LAX
Programs: AA-EXP (1.7MM), BA-Slvr, HH-Diamond
Posts: 7,784
Don't bother with XD
For me XD falls in the same camp as Sony memory stick. Unnecessary. I don't see why we needed yet another format that offers no real advantage and lower memory sizes for a higher price.
I would have to say go with either SD or CF. Those are the two formats that have the widest acceptance. I use my 2GB CF card between my camera, laptop, desktop, printer and PDA. None of the other formats are supported to this degree.
I would have to say go with either SD or CF. Those are the two formats that have the widest acceptance. I use my 2GB CF card between my camera, laptop, desktop, printer and PDA. None of the other formats are supported to this degree.
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by ByrdluvsAWACO
For me XD falls in the same camp as Sony memory stick. Unnecessary. I don't see why we needed yet another format that offers no real advantage and lower memory sizes for a higher price.
I would have to say go with either SD or CF. Those are the two formats that have the widest acceptance. I use my 2GB CF card between my camera, laptop, desktop, printer and PDA. None of the other formats are supported to this degree.
I would have to say go with either SD or CF. Those are the two formats that have the widest acceptance. I use my 2GB CF card between my camera, laptop, desktop, printer and PDA. None of the other formats are supported to this degree.
XD is fast, and there is thankfully only one XD standard (unlike memorystick with regular, magicgate, duo, duo magicgate, pro etc...).
XD's are available from several brands are are used in quite a few camera brands too.
I was pretty sceptical at first, but CD has certainly won me over, especially with it's awesome speeds (I can shoot 12MP photos and write them away one every 2 or 3 seconds, try that with SD! )
#19
Join Date: Aug 2001
Programs: AA Plat & LTG; QF LTG
Posts: 9,837
Originally Posted by ScottC
I was pretty sceptical at first, but CD has certainly won me over, especially with it's awesome speeds (I can shoot 12MP photos and write them away one every 2 or 3 seconds, try that with SD! )
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by NM
I have certainly noticed that my Fuji S304 writes a 3.2MP image to XD significantly faster than my Panasonic NV-GS400 writes a 4MP still to SD memory. I was not sure if this was the memory speed difference or other differences in the camera - for example the NV-GS400 may not be opimized for writing stills since it is a DV camcorder. But there is a noticable delay with writing to the SD card.
XD is just Smartmedia in a small form factor (I heard)...
#23
Join Date: Aug 2001
Programs: AA Plat & LTG; QF LTG
Posts: 9,837
Originally Posted by ScottC
Lots lots more... There is also Mini-SD, Transflash etc...
. At least in the end, one standard format prevailed - 135 canisters.


