![]() |
Originally Posted by Silver Fox
(Post 28185674)
I do. I am not worried about thieves. I am worried about my friends getting hold of it if I leave it unattended ! :)
Kids are worse. |
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
(Post 28356053)
SIL doesn't lock hers. She seemed puzzled when confronted by my lock screen.
This is the desired effect isn't it? |
Oddly I never locked my phone until I got a phone with a fingerprint scanner (Pixel) and felt that security was convenient enough for me to put up with.
I don't know why I never locked my other phones, but I definitely wouldn't go back now. |
Originally Posted by Madone59
(Post 28359541)
Oddly I never locked my phone until I got a phone with a fingerprint scanner (Pixel) and felt that security was convenient enough for me to put up with.
I don't know why I never locked my other phones, but I definitely wouldn't go back now. Just shows that if it is fast and easy enough, people will use it. |
Originally Posted by draver
(Post 28358029)
This is the desired effect isn't it?
|
Originally Posted by ObserverA3
(Post 28251047)
I find it interesting that many on here are trying to impose their view of the world on others. If you want to encrypt/use a screen lock on your phone, fine. If I don't (and I don't), none of anybody's business. If my company wants me to use my own phone, they can enforce password protection on the e-mail app (but instead they enforce screen lock, which means I will deactivate company e-mail while on vacation and sometimes over the weekend).
Over-the-top security, totally ignoring the end user, brought BlackBerry down. I use a Blackberry Classic as personal travel phone. No screen lock, no nothing. (there's nothing of value on it, though). Nobody steals those things anymore. |
Without intending offense, this attitude is quite depressing. Consider the fact that most people's phones contain not only their own personal information, but the often times include personal information of others, such as phone numbers, addresses, email addresses, etc. Unless someone's phone contains absolutely zero personal information, which is quite unlikely nowadays, consider the harm you might cause to others if your phone is lost/stolen/etc.
Originally Posted by ObserverA3
(Post 28251047)
I find it interesting that many on here are trying to impose their view of the world on others. If you want to encrypt/use a screen lock on your phone, fine. If I don't (and I don't), none of anybody's business. ...
|
This latest major iOS update forced a password or finger print to unlock. Before that I have always just had swipe to unlock.
|
Originally Posted by FlyingDoctorwu
(Post 28352676)
You have zero personal data on your phone? No email, no web browsing history? No previous destinations on GPS history? Contact info?
My phone is also my organizer.. so I keep i locked down. Personal contact info, banking, etc etc... FDW All things being equal, I'd much prefer to be able to put a password on my phone. But I won't do that until Android makes a distinction between screen off and phone locked. |
Originally Posted by Dylane
(Post 28469701)
All things being equal, I'd much prefer to be able to put a password on my phone. But I won't do that until Android makes a distinction between screen off and phone locked.
Even the non-customized versions have smart lock with various detections for "not locked under circumstance X." Getting a BLE token you keep elsewhere on your person, for example, would work for this, with the phone locking as soon as it was out of range of you, or a second phone (e.g. when I had a work phone and a personal one, if it had then supported it I could have used the BT presence of my personal phone to keep my work phone unlocked.) |
Originally Posted by nkedel
(Post 28470520)
Several of the open-source ROMs (I can't remember if this includes LineageOS, the version FKA Cyanogen) have options to do exactly that, or to treat the "off" as a lock only after a certain amount of time... up to and including "only require a password at startup to unencrypt." I think some carrier ROMs have done so as well.
Even the non-customized versions have smart lock with various detections for "not locked under circumstance X." Getting a BLE token you keep elsewhere on your person, for example, would work for this, with the phone locking as soon as it was out of range of you, or a second phone (e.g. when I had a work phone and a personal one, if it had then supported it I could have used the BT presence of my personal phone to keep my work phone unlocked.) ETA: Apparently this is a GApps feature and not a ROM feature. I don't have GApps installed so that explains why I haven't seen it. I do need to reflash a new ROM on the newer phone since I've been having a lot of problems with Lineage, so maybe I'll actually break down and install a GApps package at the same time. |
Originally Posted by Dylane
(Post 28470767)
Hmm...interesting. I'm running Cyanogenmod 13 on my older phone and Lineage OS on a newer one and do not recall seeing anything like this in the settings, but I'll need to investigate, because that would be the best of both worlds for me.
ETA: Apparently this is a GApps feature and not a ROM feature. I don't have GApps installed so that explains why I haven't seen it. I do need to reflash a new ROM on the newer phone since I've been having a lot of problems with Lineage, so maybe I'll actually break down and install a GApps package at the same time. I'm pretty sure the separate lock timer (and disabling auto-lock on screen off via power button) isn't GApps; my Nexus 6 doesn't have it, while my travel phone running an AOSP ROM (Krexus, based off 6.0.1) does -- under security in settings "Automatically lock? [___] minutes after sleep, except when kept unlocked by Smart Lock" and "Power Button instantly locks? [on/off]" |
My Chinese Doogee T3
https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1toBkK...pg_640x640.jpg has the ability to use bluetooth to keep the phone unlocked. So if I have my hifi bluetooth adapter on at home my phone can remain unlocked but if I go out it locks. Obviously if you've got a strong Bluetooth signal it'll stay unlocked for longer distances but with mine it doesn't go much beyond my front gate. |
Originally Posted by Jimmie76
(Post 28473779)
My Chinese Doogee T3
https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1toBkK...pg_640x640.jpg has the ability to use bluetooth to keep the phone unlocked. So if I have my hifi bluetooth adapter on at home my phone can remain unlocked but if I go out it locks. Obviously if you've got a strong Bluetooth signal it'll stay unlocked for longer distances but with mine it doesn't go much beyond my front gate. |
Originally Posted by Jimmie76
(Post 28473779)
My Chinese Doogee T3
https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1toBkK...pg_640x640.jpg has the ability to use bluetooth to keep the phone unlocked. So if I have my hifi bluetooth adapter on at home my phone can remain unlocked but if I go out it locks. Obviously if you've got a strong Bluetooth signal it'll stay unlocked for longer distances but with mine it doesn't go much beyond my front gate. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:57 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.