Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

Router-Bridge question

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Router-Bridge question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 10:30 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Programs: DL KM
Posts: 629
Router-Bridge question

I am moving into a new home shortly. It's a very long ranch, and the incoming cable and router are located at one end of the house in my office. I would like to ensure that I get a strong signal throughout the entire home. Would a wireless bridge be the best solution? If not, then what would you recommend? If needed, I can run ethernet to any room in the home without much of a problem.

Thanks.
Easy Victor is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 11:24 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,651
What kind of router were you thinking about using? I suppose if you were using Linksys, you could purchase few access points and then connect them via ethernet...
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 11:50 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: LAX
Posts: 6,769
Why does it matter if it's a Linksys? You can run ethernet cables and have wireless routers everywhere tapping off the cable.
FlyMeToTheLooneyBin is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 12:40 am
  #4  
 
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,712
Netgear makes some wireless extenders you might consider, if you don't want to run cable everywhere. I had one of those, for b/g only, they are fine. I don't remember if they support anything besides WEP or not, and I think they are kind of pricey for what you get.

You can use an Airport Express as a wireless bridge or as a wireless extender. I have 3 of them at home, one creating a 5ghz n-only wireless network, the second one is a wireless n bridge on that network to my office (it connects to a switch in the office), the 3rd one is an older b/g only AE, that extends my b/g network downstairs.

In order to use the Airport Express as a wireless extender, you need a base station (router) that implements WDS. The Apple base stations implement it, of course. Also, DD-WRT implements WDS, at least the version that I have did, and it works fine, once I figured out how to configure it. IIRC it wasn't hard to do. You have to enter the mac address of the base station in the extender and vice versa. I think the trick was to select LAN mode on the base station's WDS tab, where you enter the extenders mac address, and to remember that you can only run WEP with WDS.

You can also pick up anything that will run DD-WRT and turn it into a wireless bridge.

-David

Last edited by LIH Prem; Nov 15, 2009 at 12:49 am
LIH Prem is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 9:50 am
  #5  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
I picked up an access point off e-bay for like $15 or something like that. It's connected to the other wireless router all the way across the house by an ethernet cable. I have a dlinl one, but for example this one is $20 on e-bay

http://cgi.ebay.com/54-Mbps-Wireless...8#ht_500wt_975

It could also function as a range extender, but since it was fairly easy to run the cable (I had to run a phone one anyways) I went AP mode.

The added advantage is it gives me coverage outside on the patio too.

If you can easily run a wire, I would just do that, and get any wireless router that can function as an access point, or just an access point and use that.

Without a ton of setup it won't be totally seamless, it is way easier to have the two of them setup with different ID names and on different channels. So in essence I have two wireless networks in the house.
cordelli is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 8:14 am
  #6  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Programs: DL KM
Posts: 629
After doing some research, it looks like a router installed with DD-WRT has the capability to run as a wireless repeater. And it looks like the setup is fairly simple to do. It does knock your bandwidth down by half because the repeater uses one half bandwidth to communicate with the primary router, and the other half for users. I think I can live with that...

Thanks for all the responses!


Originally Posted by LIH Prem
Netgear makes some wireless extenders you might consider, if you don't want to run cable everywhere. I had one of those, for b/g only, they are fine. I don't remember if they support anything besides WEP or not, and I think they are kind of pricey for what you get.

You can use an Airport Express as a wireless bridge or as a wireless extender. I have 3 of them at home, one creating a 5ghz n-only wireless network, the second one is a wireless n bridge on that network to my office (it connects to a switch in the office), the 3rd one is an older b/g only AE, that extends my b/g network downstairs.

In order to use the Airport Express as a wireless extender, you need a base station (router) that implements WDS. The Apple base stations implement it, of course. Also, DD-WRT implements WDS, at least the version that I have did, and it works fine, once I figured out how to configure it. IIRC it wasn't hard to do. You have to enter the mac address of the base station in the extender and vice versa. I think the trick was to select LAN mode on the base station's WDS tab, where you enter the extenders mac address, and to remember that you can only run WEP with WDS.

You can also pick up anything that will run DD-WRT and turn it into a wireless bridge.

-David
Easy Victor is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 12:13 pm
  #7  
 
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,712
Originally Posted by Easy Victor
After doing some research, it looks like a router installed with DD-WRT has the capability to run as a wireless repeater.
Excellent, and that makes sense too.

-David
LIH Prem is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 12:20 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: CO Gold; SPG Gold***; AvisFirst;
Posts: 3,970
The standard linksys firmware also supports running in repeater mode... or you can run ethernet to multiple routers.

Main difference is that if use use wireless repeaters, the routers need to be much closer together (and therefore you may need more of them).

If you set it up to repeat, each device must be in range of it's neighbors. If you run ethernet, the signals have to overlap, but each device can be out of range of its neighbor.
mbreuer is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 12:41 pm
  #9  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Homebase: CAE - Formerly, YUL
Programs: US CP, UA, HH Gold, Marriott Plat, DL, AA, CO, ++
Posts: 2,188
If running Ethernet wire is not that big a deal, I'd just run a wire to a second router half-way down the house that's hooked up to the first router. Not crazy about losing 1/2 capacity because of repeater feature...
HereAndThereSC is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 1:44 pm
  #10  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NYC
Programs: UA, BA Avios, AMEX Plat
Posts: 529
Originally Posted by HereAndThereSC
If running Ethernet wire is not that big a deal, I'd just run a wire to a second router half-way down the house that's hooked up to the first router. Not crazy about losing 1/2 capacity because of repeater feature...
I would definitely just go this route if running cables is easy to do. Either run a cable to a midway point and put your router there and check signal strength, or router at one end, run a cable from one of the outputs there into the input of a second router. Make sure DHCP is OFF on the second router.
eyeballer is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 2:03 pm
  #11  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MSP
Programs: AA, DL, AS
Posts: 183
If your router has detachable antennas, get yourself a high gain antenna or 2 which will focus broadcast/reception on those areas of the house where you will be.
ceverett is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 7:17 am
  #12  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 392
Wireless has it place but a hardwired (cable) system
will be more reliable and faster.


Wireless is sexy but is more expensive and can be spotty
even at close range.


For travel have you looked at the MiFi wireless router?
bukzin is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 12:11 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: DL Diamond, HH Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 555
I agree, if you are okay running the cable; do it. Also, you should be able to configure both APs with the same SSID. Just make sure both have the same security settings/password configured. Even cheapo Linksys APs will support seamless roaming between APs.
Janus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.