FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Technical Support and Feedback (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/technical-support-feedback-386/)
-   -   Which forum software is FT using? What version? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/technical-support-feedback/848235-forum-software-ft-using-what-version.html)

xmlsoa Jul 24, 2008 10:47 am

Which forum software is FT using? What version?
 
Which forum software is FT using? What version?

I am looking at a bunch of forums I frequent to find out what forum software they are using. The result of this will be a selection of NEW Forum Software for a prominent Forum online that is a little out of date on the Forum software.

Mikel at Webflyer Jul 24, 2008 11:44 am

We are currently using vBulletin version 3.6.7

MSPeconomist Jan 14, 2015 11:51 am

I hate to bump an old thread, but this is where search sent me.

1) What version are we now using?

2) Is it correct to assume that Version 3.6.7 had a "like" button available? IIRC the period when Randy allowed likes and dislikes would have been long before July 2008.

IBobi Jan 14, 2015 1:52 pm

We're on 3.8. Like button would be a setup option in any case.

Paul

SanDiego1K Jan 15, 2015 10:24 am


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 24166312)

2) Is it correct to assume that Version 3.6.7 had a "like" button available? IIRC the period when Randy allowed likes and dislikes would have been long before July 2008.

I don't remember ever having likes and dislikes for posts. Randy enabled a reputation system for members for a brief period til gaming forced him to take it down.

MSPeconomist Jan 16, 2015 1:26 pm


Originally Posted by SanDiego1K (Post 24172526)
I don't remember ever having likes and dislikes for posts. Randy enabled a reputation system for members for a brief period til gaming forced him to take it down.

At that time, weren't the likes and dislikes applied to posts (like birthday wishes in a happy birthday X thread) before being aggregated over the username, with one dislike canceling out one like? I wasn't around then, but whenever the topic has come up, I've always assumed that this is how it worked during that period.

BTW, when did this happen? I've vaguely had the impression that it was perhaps around 2003.

SanDiego1K Jan 16, 2015 2:09 pm


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 24180146)
At that time, weren't the likes and dislikes applied to posts (like birthday wishes in a happy birthday X thread) before being aggregated over the username, with one dislike canceling out one like?.

I don't think so. It was much more direct. You could leave comments for people, both pro and con. It got nasty quickly. I wouldn't ever want to revisit it.

It happened in 2004.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni/...does-work.html

Mary2e Jan 16, 2015 2:56 pm

Yikes... my hair stood on end just seeing those posts again.

But what really struck me was how many people no longer post on FT - I miss seeing so many of them. A few I'm glad are gone, but it's very few. Most of the rest posting there are missed ^^

MSPeconomist Jan 16, 2015 3:01 pm


Originally Posted by SanDiego1K (Post 24180447)
I don't think so. It was much more direct. You could leave comments for people, both pro and con. It got nasty quickly. I wouldn't ever want to revisit it.

It happened in 2004.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni/...does-work.html

Thanks. This looks like something I should read, for background when people mention it as part of the "helpful" button pro/con arguments.

Mary2e Jan 16, 2015 3:11 pm

There are actually 2 threads - one is linked in the linked post above. There may be others.

But what I find remarkable is that this was TEN YEARS AGO and so many of us who were around still shudder to think of it. And that's why we're so opposed to like buttons.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:29 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.