Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

IT's Time For TEXAS

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

IT's Time For TEXAS

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 11:28 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 27,016
IT's Time For TEXAS

Dear Members of TalkBoard,
I believe it is time for Texas to have it's own Forum under Travel and Dining/United States.
So many questions which pop up on FT relate to DFW, HOU, AUS, SAT, that I believe that many queries can be asked and answered in a dedicated Texas Forum. As a TravelBuzz Moderator, I am always wary of moving a Texas query to the "South." (which is where Texas enquiries now go).
Thank you for your consideration...
Obscure2k

Last edited by obscure2k; Jul 7, 2008 at 11:40 pm
obscure2k is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 11:44 pm
  #2  
In Memoriam
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,111
Would this new forum carry the same provision as the state of Texas? That is, by the Annexation Resolution, Texas can unilaterally decide at any point to divide into up to five states.



Seriously, as a native son of the Great State of Texas (proudest and grandest, withstanding every test), and a senior mod who has oversight of "The South" forum, I'd support this proposal. ^
cblaisd is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 12:01 am
  #3  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ATL
Programs: DL, AA
Posts: 6,033
Why are you wary of sending Texas queries to "South"? Has there been a problem with those queries not receiving an answer? Are Texas threads overwhelming the "South" forum? (Serious questions - not just playing devils advocate.)

At first glance, I wondered "why not just make a subforum under South?" but after looking at the Destination fora, it makes as much sense as Florida having its own forum.
scoow is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 12:23 am
  #4  
In Memoriam
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,111
While not a Travel Buzz mod, I can answer that one: it's because questions about a particular place are to go in the appropriate geographic forum.

Otherwise Travel Buzz becomes one big mess and the information one is looking for isn't in the logical place you expect to find it.
cblaisd is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 12:27 am
  #5  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ATL
Programs: DL, AA
Posts: 6,033
I understand they need to go to the appropriate geographic forum. I'm trying to figure out what's wrong with sending them to "South"?
scoow is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 12:32 am
  #6  
Original Poster
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 27,016
Originally Posted by scoow
I understand they need to go to the appropriate geographic forum. I'm trying to figure out what's wrong with sending them to "South"?
Here is an example of a thread which would be well-served by a dedicated Texas Forum: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=842280
obscure2k is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 2:00 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney - Australia
Programs: BD, QF, QR/EY/GF & HH Gold/SPG, Hertz#1G
Posts: 11,079
I didn't realise TX was a hot travel destination.
Airport is probably a different story.

The airline forms, notably AA, probably have a lot of TX-centric discussion, too.

It looks like TB might soon be 2/2! ^
BiziBB is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 2:05 am
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, In Memoriam
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 69,201
Perhaps O/T, but I would never thought of Texas as being in the South.

Yes, I know it was part of the Confederacy, but it seems to me to be a completely different world than Mississippi, Alabama or Georgia. When I think of Texas, I conjure up a mental picture of the West.

In fact, I sometimes think that Texas is not only a part of the West, but the entire West. Cowboys, ranches, trail drives, shoot outs -- the works.

Nevada? Casinos.

Utah? The Mormon Tabernacle.

Colorado? One heck of a lot of snow.

California? Almost as many nutcases as Colorado has snowflakes.

But Texas -- ah, there is the real thing. How about if we move Texas to the "West" and throw out all the other states? Nobody will miss Nebraska or Montana anyhow.
Dovster is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 4:04 am
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
6 threads in the past month (3 active in the past 10 days) don't really strike me as a major demand for a new forum.
Jenbel is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 7:18 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: FW, TX, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Programs: 2008 FT1 Fantasy Football Champion
Posts: 10,862
I tend to troll (not, not that trolling ) the West & South fora once every couple weeks or so to see if there are any TX questions I could possibly answer. I really don't recall encountering an overwhelming # of threads.
empedocles is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 9:38 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 57,073
Originally Posted by Jenbel
6 threads in the past month (3 active in the past 10 days) don't really strike me as a major demand for a new forum.
Did numbers start counting, pardon the pun, relative to forum creation? I understood there was no firm "metrics" used as a threshold for creating a forum so would these number mean anything to anyone?

FWIW it would seem a popular enough destination IMHO to warrant a more dedicated forum or sub-forrum.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 9:49 am
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Nights
50 Countries Visited
5M
Conversation Starter
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in PARIS, FRANCE!
Posts: 61,972
My personal criteria for new forums remains unchanged:

1) Is there a core group of FTers anxious to take 'ownership' of the forum/topic/program?
2) Is there a good possibility that an active community will develop around the forum?

Having poked around a bit, I have yet to see either of those criteria met for a Texas forum. But my mind is certainly open to it if y'all can make a case/point me to evidence that I may have missed.

Originally Posted by cblaisd
While not a Travel Buzz mod, I can answer that one: it's because questions about a particular place are to go in the appropriate geographic forum.

Otherwise Travel Buzz becomes one big mess and the information one is looking for isn't in the logical place you expect to find it.
Agreed: while Texas may or may not fit in the South culturally, it certainly does geographically.

Last edited by kokonutz; Jul 8, 2008 at 9:54 am
kokonutz is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 10:01 am
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
Originally Posted by tcook052
Did numbers start counting, pardon the pun, relative to forum creation? I understood there was no firm "metrics" used as a threshold for creating a forum so would these number mean anything to anyone?

FWIW it would seem a popular enough destination IMHO to warrant a more dedicated forum or sub-forrum.
I use the number of threads within a known time period as a measure of 'business' so they mean something to me. I've got no thresholds which a suggested topic must meet (there are other criteria I can use in making my decision), but I know 6 threads in a month is not anywhere near the point at which I would consider a new forum required.
Jenbel is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 10:30 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA 2.996MM & Plat Pro, DL 1MM, GM & Flying Colonel
Posts: 25,038
Even though about half the threads in the South forum seem to be related to Texas, I don't see the critical mass for splitting it. The total post count just ain't there.

I suspect that pretty much all the Texans who'd answer questions about their state know where those posts are, so having them as part of the South (U.S.) forum isn't a problem.

(The New England forum is more active than the South forum, and about half its posts relate to Massachusetts, but I don't see any need for a separate Massachusetts forum either.)
Efrem is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 2:09 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Amtrak
Posts: 4,647
Originally Posted by kokonutz


Agreed: while Texas may or may not fit in the South culturally, it certainly does geographically.
By that logic, New Mexico and Arizona belong in the "South" forum as well, since they are geographically as far south as current "South" forum states such as Oklahoma and Kentucky.

That being said, I think Texas is more "South" culturally than people realize, especially when you consider the parts with the majority of population. Personally, I don't see the need for a separate forum.
fairviewroad is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.