FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Suggestions (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/suggestions-387/)
-   -   Avatars? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/suggestions/525166-avatars.html)

Canada Flyer Feb 10, 2006 7:01 pm

Avatars?
 
Hello.

Now sure if this is the correct area (feel free to move this thread), but I am wondering why this forum isn't equipped with avatars. I'm sure there's a logical explanation.

Thanks ya'll in advanced...

-Canada Flyer

ScottC Feb 10, 2006 9:42 pm

Would there be a logical explanation as to why they should be expected? I visit many other boards, and every one that has avatars looks awful. The only kind of avatar I wouldn't mind here would be an airline related one, but I think it would just add more clutter. FT is nice and low bandwidth intensive at the moment (for those with the premium version with no ad's).

Efrem Feb 11, 2006 7:36 am

I see no value in them. The avatars I see on other BBS are totally unrelated to anything - pets, rock stars, random graphics. They add clutter, take up screen real estate and increase load times. Just my 2¢, but I say leave 'em off. (If you absolutely have to have some kind of avatar, go to Chat and pick an airline logo.)

Cholula Feb 11, 2006 8:25 am

Although I have to admit I like avatars and use them on sites where they're allowed, I don't see them as beneficial here on FT. Avatars, especially those with motion, can be very distracting. Plus there are tons of avatars that are XXX-rated and/or insulting and argumentative. And as a moderator I could see this as a problem in trying to decide what was or wasn't allowable.
As others have stated here, a defined group of static airline logo avatars would probably work. But I see FT as a site who's main purpose is to provide information for maximizing points and miles as well as discussing tips, tricks and advice for enhancing our travel experience. And avatars would tend to detract from that discussion IMO.

Canada Flyer Feb 11, 2006 7:55 pm

Okay. Thanks.

I agree with you all. I was just curious why there wasn't any of them here.

I also agree that Airline logos would be okay, but I'm fine as-is. ;)

ozstamps Feb 16, 2006 5:01 am


Originally Posted by Cholula

I don't see them as beneficial here on FT. Avatars, especially those with motion, can be very distracting. Plus there are tons of avatars that are XXX-rated and/or insulting and argumentative.

Agree 100%. We do not need them.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:34 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.