![]() |
RTW Trip Planning
I have not done a Star RTW in a long time. I submitted a RTW booking to my travel agent ;
BKK-NRT-HKG-SFO-LAX-IAD-BOS-LGA/JFK-SIN(SQ 25 VIA FRA)-SIN-KUL-SIN-BKK. The travel agent in Bangkok got back to me and said it could not be done because I do not have a stop in Europe ? Could someone verify if this itin is okay. I plan on purchasing a Star 1 29,000 In F Class Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by francisliang
I have not done a Star RTW in a long time. I submitted a RTW booking to my travel agent ;
BKK-NRT-HKG-SFO-LAX-IAD-BOS-LGA/JFK-SIN(SQ 25 VIA FRA)-SIN-KUL-SIN-BKK. The travel agent in Bangkok got back to me and said it could not be done because I do not have a stop in Europe ? Could someone verify if this itin is okay. I plan on purchasing a Star 1 29,000 In F Class Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. I did the following flights without stopping : SIN - FRA (LH) & FRA - JFK (SQ), SQ flight was full on SIN - FRA BKK - FRA (LH) & FRA - DFW (LH) |
As far as I know there is no need for a stop over in europe. I booked my rtw from the US but the rules may be different in BKK. BTW how did it cost?
|
Thanks for the advice. I believe the cost of the ticket is around 290,000 Thai Baht which is around $ 7300 USD
|
Just make JFK-SIN as 2 coupons, JFK-FRA-SIN. Its probably coming up as an issue since you go straight from americas to asia without transfering through europe/africa so fails the progression of IATA zones test.
|
This raises a very interesting possibility if JFK-SIN on SQ25 is considered a trans-Pacific flight (even though it obviously crosses the Atlantic).
|
Originally Posted by wideman
This raises a very interesting possibility...
Originally Posted by wideman
...if JFK-SIN on SQ25 is considered a trans-Pacific flight (even though it obviously crosses the Atlantic).
cheers, Henry |
Try to simulate the RTW with the Star alliance RTW calculator, if it says there is no error in your schedule, then it's fine.
|
wideman: ...if JFK-SIN on SQ25 is considered a trans-Pacific flight (even though it obviously crosses the Atlantic)
henry999: 'Obviously'? Obviously the great circle routing is straight over the Pole, no Atlantic in sight. Nevertheless, since it is direct from NA to Asia, it is _by definition_ trans-Pacific. JFK-SIN on SQ25 stops in Frankfurt. That's why it "obviously crosses the Atlantic." Until this thread was raised, I'd neither heard of nor considered a RTW that included the JFK-(FRA)-SIN flight as the trans-Pacific leg. It's an interesting option, for example to those who want to travel in C from the US East Coast to SE Asia on a RTW while avoiding both surcharges (EWR-SIN, JFK-BKK, YYZ-HKG) and UA. |
Originally Posted by wideman
JFK-SIN on SQ25 stops in Frankfurt. That's why it "obviously crosses the Atlantic."
cheers, Henry |
Does this logic work with NZ1 LHR-(LAX)-AKL, too?
LHR-AKL is direct Europe to Asia/Oceania (Area 2 to Area 3) and you could do it without crossing neither Pacific nor Atlantic, but NZ1 is crossing both Atlantic and Pacific and stops in NA. |
NZ1/2 is treated as both Pacific and Atlantic crossing (if you do the whole flight) or the respective crossing if only taking half the flight.
If you're short on segments it's a great one to take - halfway around the world using just one segment. There are also NZ7xxx flight numbers for australia east coast (SYD/MEL/BNE) to London. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:47 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.