![]() |
Thanks for all your replies, I had the feeling that TG might have been the recommended.
Fortunately, or unfortunately (time will tell) my waitlist on Lauda cleared so I will be flying them for the first time. But I ahve some short 3 hour sectors on TG so I will be able to see what I missed (or gained!). Cheers, Mark |
Your waitlist clearing up on NG is definitely a plus. I've flown NG MEL-KUL-VIE on a 777, TG MEL-BKK-FRA on a 747, and LH only FRA-TLV on an A300. Tg wasn't bad, but NG was better.
goodo |
enjoy Laudas best business class inflight service there is now on any Star-carrier (compares to what AN did on their HKG-SYD flights).
|
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Rudi: enjoy Laudas best business class inflight service there is now on any Star-carrier (compares to what AN did on their HKG-SYD flights).</font> |
Peter42:
You said that TG has the best Y service in *... IMHO SQ beats TG by 000's of miles. |
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Manuel: Peter42: You said that TG has the best Y service in *... IMHO SQ beats TG by 000's of miles. </font> Not IMHO, see my post about SQ's service a while back. |
I wish I was in C, but alas only on NZ sectors..........
Mark |
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Manuel: Peter42: You said that TG has the best Y service in *... IMHO SQ beats TG by 000's of miles. </font> I couldn't agree with you more. SQ Y beats TG Y hands down IMHO. And that's after 12 long-haul flights in TG Y and 23 in SQ Y. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:52 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.