![]() |
Originally Posted by skidooman
(Post 20315600)
Russia/Australia: Based on distances, can definitely understand. But yeah, for Aussie, same problem than with Canada... Russia, I am scared just to think to book a domestic flight there, as I wouldn't set a foot in a Soviet plane.
Middle-East: That would indeed open up some interesting possibilities. Any of them has some kind of premium economy? For long-haul (say India), I actively look for this. Middle East: I would expect the addition of a carrier here given MS and TK on the footsteps of the Middle-East. |
Originally Posted by skidooman
(Post 20315600)
Russia/Australia: Based on distances, can definitely understand. But yeah, for Aussie, same problem than with Canada... Russia, I am scared just to think to book a domestic flight there, as I wouldn't set a foot in a Soviet plane.
|
Isn't Jet Airlines in India trying to get in?
|
Originally Posted by Swarez
(Post 20353719)
Isn't Jet Airlines in India trying to get in?
|
Saying Star lacks an Australian partner is like saying oneworld lacks a Canadian partner.
Canada has a larger popoulation, larger land mass, and much further travel distances than Australia. On Star I can't do SYD-PER. Similarly, on oneworld I can't do YVR-YYZ (AA is not allowed to sell you YVR-ORD-YYZ as a single through ticket) Regarding Star not able to fly you GRU-CNF, one could also argue that on oneworld you can't fly PEK-PVG/SHA. For every "hole" of Star, one could easily counter with another "hole" within oneworld. No single alliance is perfect. |
Originally Posted by Indelaware
(Post 20322608)
Russia: There are domestic routes flown within Russia with Airbus equipment. While some Soviet era aircraft remain in service, there are also newer Russian, non-Soviet aircraft.
Middle East: I would expect the addition of a carrier here given MS and TK on the footsteps of the Middle-East. A quick example - currently Star can already fly you into Dubai nonstop from 13 different locations, including 2 intra-ME routes of DXB-Muscat and DXB-Doha. |
Originally Posted by 787fan
(Post 20377558)
Saying Star lacks an Australian partner is like saying oneworld lacks a Canadian partner.
Canada has a larger popoulation, larger land mass, and much further travel distances than Australia. On Star I can't do SYD-PER. Similarly, on oneworld I can't do YVR-YYZ (AA is not allowed to sell you YVR-ORD-YYZ as a single through ticket) Regarding Star not able to fly you GRU-CNF, one could also argue that on oneworld you can't fly PEK-PVG/SHA. For every "hole" of Star, one could easily counter with another "hole" within oneworld. No single alliance is perfect. Therefore, I think that OneWorld members should lobby them to operate in Canada, somehow. We can see a way for Star to improve and that is by plugging a hole in Australia, among others. If QANTAS wasn't with OneWorld, we'd still be pushing it, because it improves Star. :) |
Originally Posted by maestro1981
(Post 20378409)
I agree with you 100% but I hope that rather comparing Star with other Alliances, we are just wanting to make Star better than what it currently is. A lot of people and companies are always just trying to compete with each other in so many industries now. Life is not about business. I would rather just always try to be my best rather than worry how I am compared with others.
Therefore, I think that OneWorld members should lobby them to operate in Canada, somehow. We can see a way for Star to improve and that is by plugging a hole in Australia, among others. If QANTAS wasn't with OneWorld, we'd still be pushing it, because it improves Star. :) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:45 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.