Kansas City residents have voted to re-design MCI into having a single terminal.
#31
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,574
I think people are getting hung up on "huge" and "hub" type increases.
Nobody expects either of those to happen.
And frankly, we'll all just guessing about what the market will look like 4 years from now anyway.
The main point here is that the new design doesn't require a "huge" increase to be successful. It's not going to be built with a big Braniff or Eastern type bet in mind.
Nobody expects either of those to happen.
And frankly, we'll all just guessing about what the market will look like 4 years from now anyway.
The main point here is that the new design doesn't require a "huge" increase to be successful. It's not going to be built with a big Braniff or Eastern type bet in mind.
#32
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wichita
Posts: 628
#33
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,512
Nice to know the cross-state rivalry isn't limited to Cardinals baseball and KC population growth.
#34
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: STL
Programs: Southwest A+/CP, Hilton Diamond, National Executive Elite
Posts: 170
Three new gates is a "rapid and ongoing expansion?" WN foresees 120 departures to 47 destinations out of Lambert. Both cities are attractive alternatives for businesses in high cost cities looking to expand or relocate. The new MCI is a huge plus.
Nice to know the cross-state rivalry isn't limited to Cardinals baseball and KC population growth.
Nice to know the cross-state rivalry isn't limited to Cardinals baseball and KC population growth.
#35
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,574
#36
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 26
#37
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MCI
Programs: CBP Global Entry, WN A-List Preferred, WN Companion Pass
Posts: 2,007
As costs rise, is KCI terminal project in trouble? Or moving right along?
The Kansas City StarDecember 2nd, 2018
https://www.kansascity.com/news/loca...222426215.html
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,775
#40
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MHK
Programs: AA Exec Plat - some level of status in IHG, Marriot & HIlton
Posts: 1,516
It wouldn't be for me. I live an hour from ICT and 3 from MCI. For the past 15 years, my family has taken probably about 40 round trips. (I have taken hundreds for work.) We have paid for about 10 trips and used miles the rest. The only 3 trips we have taken from MCI over ICT is when that was the only option available for the low level of miles. We are going to New Orleans in two weeks. I researched options from both airports (as well as MHK which I have taken a few times). MCI would have saved us a couple hundred dollars, but not worth it to me. Plus, the ICT airport is 10 times better than the current MCI.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 11,073
Ah, MCI airport. Used to fly through there often - before 9/11. Remember the LONG drive, some of which seemed even longer due to the rural nature of it.
Yes, it is a long ways from downtown. But, getting there is much quicker than cities like Chicago or NYC. Often, just a perception. Don't get folks going on LAX. Even when you can see the airport, it might take another 30 minutes to get to your terminal. Ha!
Too far out of town? When using Denver's new airport, folks often joke it is half-way to Kansas already. LOL!
Yes, it is a long ways from downtown. But, getting there is much quicker than cities like Chicago or NYC. Often, just a perception. Don't get folks going on LAX. Even when you can see the airport, it might take another 30 minutes to get to your terminal. Ha!
Too far out of town? When using Denver's new airport, folks often joke it is half-way to Kansas already. LOL!
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,326
New KCI could be midcontinent hub for Southwest
https://www.bizjournals.com/kansasci...southwest.html
#43
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,700
New KCI could be midcontinent hub for Southwest
https://www.bizjournals.com/kansasci...southwest.html
#44
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,574
It already feels like a "focus city" or whatever Southwest would call it. (They bristle at the idea of calling things hubs.)
I can't think of many nonstops I'd like to have that Southwest doesn't already have. Maybe a couple more to per day to the Bay Area would be nice. A couple additional SoCal airports besides LAX and SAN would be nice. A nonstop to PVD would save me an hour on the T but I'm not holding my breath. I don't particularly care about WN's current international destinations but if they added Canada it'd be nice to be in position to get a nonstop or two.
The new terminal will likely bring more WN frequencies, regardless of what they call it.
[sarcasm]But I don't know what I'd do if Allegiant gets mad and leaves town.[/sarcasm]
I can't think of many nonstops I'd like to have that Southwest doesn't already have. Maybe a couple more to per day to the Bay Area would be nice. A couple additional SoCal airports besides LAX and SAN would be nice. A nonstop to PVD would save me an hour on the T but I'm not holding my breath. I don't particularly care about WN's current international destinations but if they added Canada it'd be nice to be in position to get a nonstop or two.
The new terminal will likely bring more WN frequencies, regardless of what they call it.
[sarcasm]But I don't know what I'd do if Allegiant gets mad and leaves town.[/sarcasm]
#45
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 90
It already feels like a "focus city" or whatever Southwest would call it. (They bristle at the idea of calling things hubs.)
I can't think of many nonstops I'd like to have that Southwest doesn't already have. Maybe a couple more to per day to the Bay Area would be nice. A couple additional SoCal airports besides LAX and SAN would be nice. A nonstop to PVD would save me an hour on the T but I'm not holding my breath. I don't particularly care about WN's current international destinations but if they added Canada it'd be nice to be in position to get a nonstop or two.
The new terminal will likely bring more WN frequencies, regardless of what they call it.
[sarcasm]But I don't know what I'd do if Allegiant gets mad and leaves town.[/sarcasm]
I can't think of many nonstops I'd like to have that Southwest doesn't already have. Maybe a couple more to per day to the Bay Area would be nice. A couple additional SoCal airports besides LAX and SAN would be nice. A nonstop to PVD would save me an hour on the T but I'm not holding my breath. I don't particularly care about WN's current international destinations but if they added Canada it'd be nice to be in position to get a nonstop or two.
The new terminal will likely bring more WN frequencies, regardless of what they call it.
[sarcasm]But I don't know what I'd do if Allegiant gets mad and leaves town.[/sarcasm]