Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Southwest Airlines | Rapid Rewards
Reload this Page >

Southwest testing faster deplaning process at San Jose, Sacramento airports

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Southwest testing faster deplaning process at San Jose, Sacramento airports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2017, 4:43 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 238
Southwest testing faster deplaning process at San Jose, Sacramento airports

Anyone seen this yet? My home airport is SMF and I can't see how they would do it without using stairs to the tarmac for the back exit, then back up to the terminal.

http://www.sfgate.com/travel/article...n-11183003.php
forecheck is offline  
Old May 30, 2017, 4:48 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LAX/SMF/PDX/HNL
Programs: Hilton-lifetime diamond, Southwest A+, companion pass
Posts: 1,748
They did this for a brief period of time at SMF, but all I remember is the option to board the aircraft through the rear door.

Yes, you had to walk across the tarmac from the rear stairs, just as you have always had to do at Burbank airport.
dlaue is offline  
Old May 30, 2017, 5:00 pm
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
AA & US before it have done this for years with Shuttle flights, especially at LGA. Air stairs are used for the rear exit and there is an announcement made, reminding passengers that the option is available.

It can knock the deplaning time way down, but it does take a bit of cooperation because passengers in the last 10 rows who for one reason or another don't want to or cannot use the air stairs need to wait for the <2 minutes it takes for those headed to the rear to head back. Because driving air stairs takes a level of competence which some GA's who can't seem to connect a jetway to the cabin door, the rear-exiting pax are often done before the front cabin door is even open.
Often1 is offline  
Old May 30, 2017, 5:44 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ABQ
Programs: Delta Platinum, Southwest A-List
Posts: 1,426
I can see how this would make boarding quicker too. Bc savy passengers won't fear going to the back of the plane, making boarding quicker.
Juanefny is offline  
Old May 30, 2017, 5:47 pm
  #5  
ryw
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATL
Programs: DL GM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,241
I've seen it done at Burbank and Long Beach where there are no jetways and everyone has to walk on the tarmac between the plane and terminal. In those cases, there's usually a ramp rolled up to the front door and a set of air stairs rolled to the back door (both for boarding and deplaning).

Though they don't always do it if the flights aren't completely full - as I learned the hard way sitting in row 20 on a half full flight to LGB thinking I'd be the first down the rear stairs only to hear on landing that we were only deplaning out the front!
ryw is offline  
Old May 30, 2017, 8:57 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SNA
Programs: Bonvoy LTTE/AMB, AmEx Plat, National EE, WN A-List, CLEAR+, Covid-19
Posts: 4,966
I've had a couple of flights into SJC with the rear door available for deplaning. Turns out the real problem is that unlike BUR where you go down one set of (air)stairs to the ground-floor doorway into the terminal, at SJC you descend the airstairs, then you have to take another set of (low clearance, I almost bumped my (6'3") head) winding stairs three flights up into the front-door jetway and the low-mobility folks get caught unaware of what they had to do, and slow everyone behind them to a crawl.
kennycrudup is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2017, 10:43 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,326
Originally Posted by forecheck
Anyone seen this yet? My home airport is SMF and I can't see how they would do it without using stairs to the tarmac for the back exit, then back up to the terminal.

http://www.sfgate.com/travel/article...n-11183003.php
Yes, I do. I remember when I flew to SJC during same day trips. I have to go back gallery of the aircraft. I got off the plane. I knows they don't have jet bridge at entire terminal C.
N830MH is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2017, 10:46 am
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
It sounds like this gets everyone off the plane sooner, so it sounds like it's good for Southwest, but it doesn't save time for the passengers who must walk down the stairs, across the tarmac, and back up the stairs into the terminal, all while carrying luggage, kids, car seats, etc. It's basically a quicker turnaround for the aircraft at the expense (in convenience and time) of some customers.

This will also change some people's decisions about whether to go for aisle seats in the very back of the plane.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2017, 11:08 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Traveling the World
Posts: 6,072
Originally Posted by kennycrudup
I've had a couple of flights into SJC with the rear door available for deplaning. Turns out the real problem is that unlike BUR where you go down one set of (air)stairs to the ground-floor doorway into the terminal, at SJC you descend the airstairs, then you have to take another set of (low clearance, I almost bumped my (6'3") head) winding stairs three flights up into the front-door jetway and the low-mobility folks get caught unaware of what they had to do, and slow everyone behind them to a crawl.
I imagined using two jetbridges like they do for international flights and they even use three for the Airbus 380. At SJC thete is a secrete door that leads directly to the baggage claim. For those connecting there should be an elevator and for those claiming baggage open the door that leads directly to the Tetminal B Baggage claim


A compete failure on WN's part using stairs in the rain going down and then climb three levels back up that takes more time.
danielonn is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2017, 11:11 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,539
Originally Posted by danielonn
I imagined using two jetbridges like they do for international flights and they even use three for the Airbus 380. At SJC thete is a secrete door that leads directly to the baggage claim. For those connecting there should be an elevator and for those claiming baggage open the door that leads directly to the Tetminal B Baggage claim


A compete failure on WN's part using stairs in the rain going down and then climb three levels back up that takes more time.
It may exist, but I've never seen an airbridge for the rear door.
Jaimito Cartero is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2017, 1:22 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Programs: WN F9 HA UA AA IHG HH MR
Posts: 3,305
Originally Posted by Jaimito Cartero
It may exist, but I've never seen an airbridge for the rear door.
UA used five overwing jetways at DEN to the rear door. They were going to expand their use until one smashed the wing of a B757. Oops.
Tanic is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2017, 7:59 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Programs: AA Platinum Pro
Posts: 652
I remember years ago, (this was early 2000's) at SAN. If your WN flight pulled into Gates 1-2-3 area in terminal one, airstairs front and back doors were used. It was really fun if you didn't have problem navigating the stairs.
davesam12 is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 2:12 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Redlands, CA
Programs: AS, AA, WN
Posts: 974
AS does this (or used to) on many of their flights. I found it was faster for deplaning but boarding time didn't seem much improved. I always suspected many travelers were just uncertain or uncomfortable with the idea of boarding from the back, so I'd find that even ones in the "rear boarding" lanes would often just move to the jet bridge side of the line once they passed the GA.
flg8rmatt is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2017, 2:16 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,775
Originally Posted by flg8rmatt
AS does this (or used to) on many of their flights. I found it was faster for deplaning but boarding time didn't seem much improved. I always suspected many travelers were just uncertain or uncomfortable with the idea of boarding from the back, so I'd find that even ones in the "rear boarding" lanes would often just move to the jet bridge side of the line once they passed the GA.
Those are people that ride the city bus, where you cannot board from the back, only the front (where you pay) but you can disembark from the front or rear.

(I like city buses so this isn't a slam on that)
Kevin AA is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2017, 3:39 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SNA
Programs: Bonvoy LTTE/AMB, AmEx Plat, National EE, WN A-List, CLEAR+, Covid-19
Posts: 4,966
Originally Posted by flg8rmatt
I always suspected many travelers were just uncertain or uncomfortable with the idea of boarding from the back ...
Rear-boarding/deplaning is pretty popular at BUR, though. What's nice about there is you descend to ground level, where the gate door is (both ends of the plane use stairs).

Originally Posted by Kevin AA
Those are people that ride the city bus, where you cannot board from the back, only the front (where you pay) ...
FWIW, in the Bay Area (and IIRC the Sacramento area) most riders use Clipper cards to pay, and you can board from any door.
kennycrudup is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.