![]() |
Originally Posted by pokeable
(Post 17476725)
Also get to fly KL for the first time (IAD-DXB). KL can't be THAT bad, can it? :)
|
Originally Posted by pokeable
(Post 17476725)
Next long trip will have an EK leg, DXB-MLE. In Y, though. Still interested to see how EK stacks up.
Also get to fly KL for the first time (IAD-DXB). KL can't be THAT bad, can it? :) I can't think of any carrier that really shines in Y. TG and SQ are better than many, but it's still coach (humane cattle class, perhaps?) |
Originally Posted by pokeable
(Post 17476725)
Next long trip will have an EK leg, DXB-MLE. In Y, though. Still interested to see how EK stacks up.
Also get to fly KL for the first time (IAD-DXB). KL can't be THAT bad, can it? :) With most flights under 60 minutes in the air, including climb and descent, I usually get 3 drink refills plus a sandwich in Y (which does not cause renal failure after 3 hours like most airplane food). TATL I can't say as I always have Delta operated flights. |
Originally Posted by worldexpress
(Post 17475025)
Um.. Ever noticed the ST roster? Aeroflot.. Chinese carrier 1.. Kenya... Chinese carrier 2.. Korean.. Chinese 3.. Emirates or Qatar doesn't seem like a logical fit. :D If not a western carrier, the prerequisite criterion seems to be: communist (or former) or dismal safety records.
Even if aeroflot has modern planes I now refuse to fly them. |
Originally Posted by DaddyRabbit
(Post 17475354)
AF has a very good service from CDG to DXB and AUH.
dl.dumb is report KL flights using an MD-11 which sounded depressing. seatguru tho says that their Y cabin is actually slightly better than many modern aircract. Can anyone comment on this? http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/KLM/KLM_MD-11.php |
Just noticed you can credit Emirates skywards points to KE, anyone have ideas for shenas to get those into sky-pesos?
EDIT: and now I'm just spamming, but I thought a few folks might be interested in the promoted adult beverages on emirates :D http://www.emirates.com/de/english/i...254-684875.jpg |
Originally Posted by adamj023
(Post 17476584)
Korean Airlines is underrated and just like Korea itself from automobile manufacturing to electronics and beyond will get even better. Korean Airlines has vastly improved over years past.
Um........ http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milea...or-560-ai.html KE doesn't know the meaning of customer service and has probably just lost a lot of business, especially for people involved or following this thread. After this debacle, I will never fly KE.
Originally Posted by johnm1019
Even if aeroflot has modern planes I now refuse to fly them.
|
Originally Posted by Sabai
(Post 17476771)
I can't think of any carrier that really shines in Y. TG and SQ are better than many, but it's still coach (humane cattle class, perhaps?)
Originally Posted by tc_jedi
(Post 17479422)
Um........ http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milea...or-560-ai.html
KE doesn't know the meaning of customer service and has probably just lost a lot of business, especially for people involved or following this thread. After this debacle, I will never fly KE. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:01 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.