OT - Oh drama, Pat O'Brien quits Grits over Bill C-38!
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,092
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...hub=TopStories
It's about time.
And no, Pat, I wonder when you will follow the footsteps of "dirty laundry".
Liberal MP Pat O'Brien, who opposes his party's position on gay marriage, says he's quitting the Grits to sit as an Independent.
The move comes less than two months after he held a news conference to announce he was staying with the Liberals despite misgivings.
O'Brien has been out of step with his party on social issues and has been long opposed to the government's efforts to pass legislation to legalize same-sex marriage.
The move comes less than two months after he held a news conference to announce he was staying with the Liberals despite misgivings.
O'Brien has been out of step with his party on social issues and has been long opposed to the government's efforts to pass legislation to legalize same-sex marriage.
And no, Pat, I wonder when you will follow the footsteps of "dirty laundry".
#2
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Finally, a liberal with principles
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,099
The Libs and NDP ,Conservatives and Bloc cancel each other out,we're left with 4 independents to cast their votes(and they are split as well)
Very interesting .The Speaker has never been so popular
Very interesting .The Speaker has never been so popular
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
They should all sit as independants... the Lib are corrupt, the PC's are bigots and the NDP will ruin the country...
the Green Party never looked so good!
the Green Party never looked so good!
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,549
Originally Posted by mtacchi
Perhaps Flyertalk should field a party
?
?
#7
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,092
Pat O'Brien said:
Do you agree with him?
It seems this is the case a lone person who can't get what he wants and felt he could have greater leverage seating as an independent given the current state of the Parliament. In other words, I think he is trying to take the Government hostage over this issue like Kilgour. But like the Alberta MP, after he got what he wanted over Sudan, O'Brien (and Kilgoure) still acted like a scorpion.
Mr. O'Brien doesn't want the Parliament to vote on this bill because he knows it will pass by a landslide as per the two previous votes, around 25~30 votes margin. How democratic of him?
And we can have witness hearings till 2010 and he will still say there aren't enough hearings. This is filibuster to its best. I failed to see the need of continuing the debate when most of the MPs and most of the parties' leaderships have openly endorsed the bill. What we will hear is religious extremists continue to express venom after venom, linking gay marriage to sex with children and sex with animal (and they did) or prostitutes. And they wonder why they got a less than polite rebute from Real Menard, the Bloc MP and Chair who sits on that committee (he is openly gay). Now Mr. O'Brien is complaining about the 'treatment of the witnesses'.
They got what they deserved.
"I tried my best as part of the Liberal caucus to achieve my objectives. I now find that I can't do that any more," he said at a news conference Monday morning in Ottawa.
"I'm not being listened to in the Liberal caucus to the degree I want to be on this issue. They're determined to move forward on this issue and you can see what a rush they are in to do that.''
He decided to stick with the Liberals in April after Prime Minister Paul Martin promised expanded debate of the marriage bill, including cross-Canada hearings.
But O'Brien said the "full, fair and meaningful'' hearings he expected haven't happened.
"The truth is not what you say, the truth is what you do," said O'Brien.
He berated the Liberals for imposing a June deadline for debate of the bill, and for what he calls the poor treatment of witnesses before committee hearings on the measure.
"I'm not being listened to in the Liberal caucus to the degree I want to be on this issue. They're determined to move forward on this issue and you can see what a rush they are in to do that.''
He decided to stick with the Liberals in April after Prime Minister Paul Martin promised expanded debate of the marriage bill, including cross-Canada hearings.
But O'Brien said the "full, fair and meaningful'' hearings he expected haven't happened.
"The truth is not what you say, the truth is what you do," said O'Brien.
He berated the Liberals for imposing a June deadline for debate of the bill, and for what he calls the poor treatment of witnesses before committee hearings on the measure.
It seems this is the case a lone person who can't get what he wants and felt he could have greater leverage seating as an independent given the current state of the Parliament. In other words, I think he is trying to take the Government hostage over this issue like Kilgour. But like the Alberta MP, after he got what he wanted over Sudan, O'Brien (and Kilgoure) still acted like a scorpion.
Mr. O'Brien doesn't want the Parliament to vote on this bill because he knows it will pass by a landslide as per the two previous votes, around 25~30 votes margin. How democratic of him?
And we can have witness hearings till 2010 and he will still say there aren't enough hearings. This is filibuster to its best. I failed to see the need of continuing the debate when most of the MPs and most of the parties' leaderships have openly endorsed the bill. What we will hear is religious extremists continue to express venom after venom, linking gay marriage to sex with children and sex with animal (and they did) or prostitutes. And they wonder why they got a less than polite rebute from Real Menard, the Bloc MP and Chair who sits on that committee (he is openly gay). Now Mr. O'Brien is complaining about the 'treatment of the witnesses'.
They got what they deserved.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,099
What happens if Duceppe resigns his seat to run for the PQ leadership?The balance changes again.
#9
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by Guava
Pat O'Brien said:
Do you agree with him?
It seems this is the case a lone person who can't get what he wants and felt he could have greater leverage seating as an independent given the current state of the Parliament. In other words, I think he is trying to take the Government hostage over this issue like Kilgour. But like the Alberta MP, after he got what he wanted over Sudan, O'Brien (and Kilgoure) still acted like a scorpion.
Mr. O'Brien doesn't want the Parliament to vote on this bill because he knows it will pass by a landslide as per the two previous votes, around 25~30 votes margin. How democratic of him?
And we can have witness hearings till 2010 and he will still say there aren't enough hearings. This is filibuster to its best. I failed to see the need of continuing the debate when most of the MPs and most of the parties' leaderships have openly endorsed the bill. What we will hear is religious extremists continue to express venom after venom, linking gay marriage to sex with children and sex with animal (and they did) or prostitutes. And they wonder why they got a less than polite rebute from Real Menard, the Bloc MP and Chair who sits on that committee (he is openly gay). Now Mr. O'Brien is complaining about the 'treatment of the witnesses'.
They got what they deserved.
Do you agree with him?
It seems this is the case a lone person who can't get what he wants and felt he could have greater leverage seating as an independent given the current state of the Parliament. In other words, I think he is trying to take the Government hostage over this issue like Kilgour. But like the Alberta MP, after he got what he wanted over Sudan, O'Brien (and Kilgoure) still acted like a scorpion.
Mr. O'Brien doesn't want the Parliament to vote on this bill because he knows it will pass by a landslide as per the two previous votes, around 25~30 votes margin. How democratic of him?
And we can have witness hearings till 2010 and he will still say there aren't enough hearings. This is filibuster to its best. I failed to see the need of continuing the debate when most of the MPs and most of the parties' leaderships have openly endorsed the bill. What we will hear is religious extremists continue to express venom after venom, linking gay marriage to sex with children and sex with animal (and they did) or prostitutes. And they wonder why they got a less than polite rebute from Real Menard, the Bloc MP and Chair who sits on that committee (he is openly gay). Now Mr. O'Brien is complaining about the 'treatment of the witnesses'.
They got what they deserved.I think you are just afraid the full truth will get out and destroy your wet dream.
#10
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,092
Originally Posted by acysb87
What happens if Duceppe resigns his seat to run for the PQ leadership?The balance changes again. 

#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
This gives the Liberals a nice out by letting C-38 be voted down. They are not going to expend anything to get it passed.
#12
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,092
Originally Posted by exAC
This gives the Liberals a nice out by letting C-38 be voted down. They are not going to expend anything to get it passed.
#13
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by Guava
How do the Grits 'let C-38 voted down'? The numbers aren't there so how would they do that even if they want to unless Paul Martin says: "We are dropping this bill?"
#14


Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: YUL-YQB-BTV
Programs: SPG-Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,356
This thread should go to OMNI, as I feel that pretty soon names and insults are gonna start flying around...
#15
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: YOW
Posts: 750
Originally Posted by Guava
.... And they wonder why they got a less than polite rebute from Real Menard, the Bloc MP and Chair who sits on that committee (he is openly gay). Now Mr. O'Brien is complaining about the 'treatment of the witnesses'.
They got what they deserved.
They got what they deserved.

