ANNOUNCEMENT - A new revitalised Executive Club is coming
#316
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,847
but in return the MFU cost will be lower
maybe Nicci could clarify this
Now:
ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 32 500 and include upgrading the feeder flight to CE
In the future, will it be either
1. ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 25 000 upgrading the feeder flight to CE is optional and will cost 7500
or
2. ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 32 500 upgrading the feeder flight to CE is optional and will cost another 7500(or more?)
I see 1. as a improvement, I wouldn't upgrade to CE unless I had to
maybe Nicci could clarify this
Now:
ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 32 500 and include upgrading the feeder flight to CE
In the future, will it be either
1. ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 25 000 upgrading the feeder flight to CE is optional and will cost 7500
or
2. ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 32 500 upgrading the feeder flight to CE is optional and will cost another 7500(or more?)
I see 1. as a improvement, I wouldn't upgrade to CE unless I had to
In the future, it will be:
25K to MFU LHR-LAX return
plus
20K to MFU ATH-LHR return
So a total of 45K for what used to cost 32.5K. True, you do not have to upgrade ATH-LHR and you can sit in economy instead (which, I suspect, most will given the high cost of upgrade for the relatively low added value).
Ex zone 1, however the cost was exactly the same as ex UK so there cannot be any saving by flying the intra-European connector in Y. It is a pure additional cost (or, if you prefer, a pure downgrade from CE to Y on the connecting leg).
Presumably, JER will be treated the same as other European zone 1 destinations rather than domestic since it is already treated that way for product purposes and the JER-LON connector will now be in Y for WT+ to CW MFUs unless you want to fork out an additional 9K.
#317
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold; LH Senator
Posts: 30,569
#318
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 17,998
In this instance if miles = avios, then this is just being used as a smokescreen for the devaluation (or increased cost) on the TLV, Mauritius, Larnaca and other routes. I would expect further devaluation to follow on other routes after this is introduced, which makes sense given the massive amount of miles BA is distriburing via Chase.
I do find it interesting that the redemption levels are dropping for LHR-JFK. It begs the question of whether this will apply to all TATL routes, i.e. including ORD and SFO, or just to JFK. The BA website claims there are "many additional reductions" so I guess we'll have to wait. However being the pessimist, I'd bet against. Rather it's a reflection of the heavy competition on the NY to London route, and savvy flyers discovering that the cost of mileage ticket with all of the ridiculous surcharges and luxury taxes doesn't provide good value - as compared with a 10 hour flight to/from the west coast.
#320
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Silver again, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,490
#321
Ambassador
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Frankfurt
Posts: 1,755
In this instance if miles = avios, then this is just being used as a smokescreen for the devaluation (or increased cost) on the TLV, Mauritius, Larnaca and other routes. I would expect further devaluation to follow on other routes after this is introduced, which makes sense given the massive amount of miles BA is distriburing via Chase.
#322
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: BAEC Gold, Hilton Gold, Skywards, SPG Gold
Posts: 88
Apologies if I make a mistake, Im new here. The forum has helped me to make several bookings over the past few months, thank you.
I just wondered if anybody had any thoughts about Upgrading Using Avios and if other changes yet to be announced might affect this. What are the chances of only full fare tickets being eligible for upgrades?
Its strange that in the new T&Cs the first paragraph is for BA only, however below that BA is also listed along with AA & IB which states Upgrading using Avios Points on BA, AA and IB Flights are permitted on eligible published fares only (Fare classes are: J, C, D, W, Y, B).
Could the BA only section be removed come November?
I just wondered if anybody had any thoughts about Upgrading Using Avios and if other changes yet to be announced might affect this. What are the chances of only full fare tickets being eligible for upgrades?
Its strange that in the new T&Cs the first paragraph is for BA only, however below that BA is also listed along with AA & IB which states Upgrading using Avios Points on BA, AA and IB Flights are permitted on eligible published fares only (Fare classes are: J, C, D, W, Y, B).
Could the BA only section be removed come November?
#323
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AF, VS, AA, Amex, etc
Posts: 101
Worst case is probably something like LHR-(LAX/ORD/DFW)-HNL which currently you can MFU for 25k WTP->CW/domestic F. That will now be 20k or 25k plus something else (unclear how much to me)... Does anyone know what the cost under the new system will be to do the same?
I would view this as different to the CE/ET situation for European feeder flights as there is a much greater differentiation between domestic F and Y on AA than there is between CE and ET.
#325
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PHL
Programs: HH Diamond, SPG Plat; no plans for chasing any more airline status.
Posts: 880
As far as the ex-US awards... Any way of speculating - yes, I know, it's FT's favorite word - how redemption rates may/may not change specifically to Asia/Far East?
#326
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,847
I think we already know not all tatl routes will be affected: there will be different zones for East and West Coast and the West coast will not be lower than now. What we do not yet know is where the line between the zones will be drawn exactly.
#327
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Silver again, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,490

Are you by any chance a Chase reward holder? Just asking, in a casual and friendly manner.
#328
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SE1, London & White River, South Africa
Posts: 24,597
Don't want to rain on your party, but I can't think of a major airline mileage program announcement in recent years that has significant positive news. There are almost always takeaways, and a few if any added perks.
In this instance if miles = avios, then this is just being used as a smokescreen for the devaluation (or increased cost) on the TLV, Mauritius, Larnaca and other routes. I would expect further devaluation to follow on other routes after this is introduced, which makes sense given the massive amount of miles BA is distriburing via Chase.
In this instance if miles = avios, then this is just being used as a smokescreen for the devaluation (or increased cost) on the TLV, Mauritius, Larnaca and other routes. I would expect further devaluation to follow on other routes after this is introduced, which makes sense given the massive amount of miles BA is distriburing via Chase.
#329


Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Berlin
Programs: LH SEN, BA Gold, SK Gold; Accor Diamond; IHG Diamond-Amb; Meli/HH/Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 5,682
They didn't only release "good news". They've told us that some redemptions are going to be more expensive and they've certainly given Airmiles customers some bad news. Oh yes, and they've admitted that they really are intending to call the things "Avios".
#330


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,045
Currently, on ATH-LAX (or other zone 3 destinations like IST, KBP, etc...), you MFU from WT+ to CW for 32.5K return
In the future, it will be:
25K to MFU LHR-LAX return
plus
20K to MFU ATH-LHR return
So a total of 45K for what used to cost 32.5K. True, you do not have to upgrade ATH-LHR and you can sit in economy instead (which, I suspect, most will given the high cost of upgrade for the relatively low added value).
Ex zone 1, however the cost was exactly the same as ex UK so there cannot be any saving by flying the intra-European connector in Y. It is a pure additional cost (or, if you prefer, a pure downgrade from CE to Y on the connecting leg).
Presumably, JER will be treated the same as other European zone 1 destinations rather than domestic since it is already treated that way for product purposes and the JER-LON connector will now be in Y for WT+ to CW MFUs unless you want to fork out an additional 9K.
In the future, it will be:
25K to MFU LHR-LAX return
plus
20K to MFU ATH-LHR return
So a total of 45K for what used to cost 32.5K. True, you do not have to upgrade ATH-LHR and you can sit in economy instead (which, I suspect, most will given the high cost of upgrade for the relatively low added value).
Ex zone 1, however the cost was exactly the same as ex UK so there cannot be any saving by flying the intra-European connector in Y. It is a pure additional cost (or, if you prefer, a pure downgrade from CE to Y on the connecting leg).
Presumably, JER will be treated the same as other European zone 1 destinations rather than domestic since it is already treated that way for product purposes and the JER-LON connector will now be in Y for WT+ to CW MFUs unless you want to fork out an additional 9K.
but will it really cost 20k to upgrade the feeder flight?
You are paying for a WTP ticket even if that class doesn't exist shorthaul.
Something which has to be clarified.
I can imagine someone flying from zone 3 might want to upgrade the feeder flight, but if it's going to cost that much they're the real loosers.
Besides, if 20k is correct MFU ATH-LHR would cost the same as LHR-JFK
Last edited by Hannibal Lecter; Sep 1, 2011 at 11:48 am


