Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | The British Airways Club
Reload this Page >

ANNOUNCEMENT - A new revitalised Executive Club is coming

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

ANNOUNCEMENT - A new revitalised Executive Club is coming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:20 am
  #316  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,847
Originally Posted by Hannibal Lecter
but in return the MFU cost will be lower

maybe Nicci could clarify this

Now:
ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 32 500 and include upgrading the feeder flight to CE

In the future, will it be either

1. ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 25 000 upgrading the feeder flight to CE is optional and will cost 7500

or

2. ATH-LHR-LAX MFU WTP to CW cost 32 500 upgrading the feeder flight to CE is optional and will cost another 7500(or more?)


I see 1. as a improvement, I wouldn't upgrade to CE unless I had to
Currently, on ATH-LAX (or other zone 3 destinations like IST, KBP, etc...), you MFU from WT+ to CW for 32.5K return
In the future, it will be:
25K to MFU LHR-LAX return
plus
20K to MFU ATH-LHR return

So a total of 45K for what used to cost 32.5K. True, you do not have to upgrade ATH-LHR and you can sit in economy instead (which, I suspect, most will given the high cost of upgrade for the relatively low added value).

Ex zone 1, however the cost was exactly the same as ex UK so there cannot be any saving by flying the intra-European connector in Y. It is a pure additional cost (or, if you prefer, a pure downgrade from CE to Y on the connecting leg).
Presumably, JER will be treated the same as other European zone 1 destinations rather than domestic since it is already treated that way for product purposes and the JER-LON connector will now be in Y for WT+ to CW MFUs unless you want to fork out an additional 9K.
NickB is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:22 am
  #317  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold; LH Senator
Posts: 30,569
Originally Posted by where2travel
However, on a number of occasions, it seems to be the name of the currency too - "9,000 Avios" required for Zone 1 etc. Does it mean you can have 1 Avio or will it be a singular word that happens to end with an "s"?.

Avio - Avios - Avioses - Aviii. Take your pick!
irishguy28 is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:23 am
  #318  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 17,998
Originally Posted by Swanhunter
MFU stays, don't panic. I think we'll like most of what is to come too.
Don't want to rain on your party, but I can't think of a major airline mileage program announcement in recent years that has significant positive news. There are almost always takeaways, and a few if any added perks.

In this instance if miles = avios, then this is just being used as a smokescreen for the devaluation (or increased cost) on the TLV, Mauritius, Larnaca and other routes. I would expect further devaluation to follow on other routes after this is introduced, which makes sense given the massive amount of miles BA is distriburing via Chase.

Originally Posted by Rambuster
I still don't trust these changes. It would be the first time in history that I actually benefit from changes to an FFP.
I have a bad feeling about what's to come in November?
Maybe I'm just paranoid though?
Agree 100%, see my comments above. If you have just enough BA miles for an upcoming trip, I'd book it before November. Better to pay the change fee if for some reason you luck out and can find space at a reduced rate after the changes.

I do find it interesting that the redemption levels are dropping for LHR-JFK. It begs the question of whether this will apply to all TATL routes, i.e. including ORD and SFO, or just to JFK. The BA website claims there are "many additional reductions" so I guess we'll have to wait. However being the pessimist, I'd bet against. Rather it's a reflection of the heavy competition on the NY to London route, and savvy flyers discovering that the cost of mileage ticket with all of the ridiculous surcharges and luxury taxes doesn't provide good value - as compared with a 10 hour flight to/from the west coast.
Boraxo is online now  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:23 am
  #319  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newcastle, UK
Programs: BA Silver, IHG Gold, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, Avis Preferred Plus, Amex Plat
Posts: 2,081
Originally Posted by irishguy28
Avio - Avios - Avioses - Aviii. Take your pick!
Aviamos
Aviatrix
Avis
mad_rich is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:26 am
  #320  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
500k
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Silver again, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,490
Originally Posted by nmenaker
RABID was the word I was hoping for, stupid iphone auto-correct spell check!
OK, you're forgiven

The latest Mac/Safari upgrade does the same thing.
T8191 is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:30 am
  #321  
Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Frankfurt
Posts: 1,755
Originally Posted by Boraxo
In this instance if miles = avios, then this is just being used as a smokescreen for the devaluation (or increased cost) on the TLV, Mauritius, Larnaca and other routes. I would expect further devaluation to follow on other routes after this is introduced, which makes sense given the massive amount of miles BA is distriburing via Chase.
The devaluation you speak of seems to me to be more than balanced out on other routes. Eight times as many routes decrease in price as increase.
BA304 is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:34 am
  #322  
JIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: BAEC Gold, Hilton Gold, Skywards, SPG Gold
Posts: 88
Apologies if I make a mistake, Im new here. The forum has helped me to make several bookings over the past few months, thank you.

I just wondered if anybody had any thoughts about Upgrading Using Avios and if other changes yet to be announced might affect this. What are the chances of only full fare tickets being eligible for upgrades?

Its strange that in the new T&Cs the first paragraph is for BA only, however below that BA is also listed along with AA & IB which states Upgrading using Avios Points on BA, AA and IB Flights are permitted on eligible published fares only (Fare classes are: J, C, D, W, Y, B).
Could the BA only section be removed come November?
JIP is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:34 am
  #323  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AF, VS, AA, Amex, etc
Posts: 101
Originally Posted by orbitmic
3 - EC members based in some parts of the world such as the North East US (and presumably Eastern Canada), parts of South East Asia such as China, HKG, Thailand - who directly benefit from cheaper awards and MFUs/UUAs.
Not sure about this - only really applies if they have a direct flight. Since October last year I thought it had been possible to book (e.g.) LHR-JFK-[AA destination] in WTP and then MFU the whole thing for 25k which will also put you into domestic F on the AA leg (if it exists). Under the new system from what I can see you can either stay in Y on the AA leg for 20k or pay something >25k (not sure what) to get into domestic F.

Worst case is probably something like LHR-(LAX/ORD/DFW)-HNL which currently you can MFU for 25k WTP->CW/domestic F. That will now be 20k or 25k plus something else (unclear how much to me)... Does anyone know what the cost under the new system will be to do the same?

I would view this as different to the CE/ET situation for European feeder flights as there is a much greater differentiation between domestic F and Y on AA than there is between CE and ET.
tomatocracy is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:34 am
  #324  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
Avios Points?

How many has BA paid their branding consultant to dream that one up?

Johan
johan rebel is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:35 am
  #325  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PHL
Programs: HH Diamond, SPG Plat; no plans for chasing any more airline status.
Posts: 880
Originally Posted by BA304
The devaluation you speak of seems to me to be more than balanced out on other routes. Eight times as many routes decrease in price as increase.
And don't forget the beauty of the "infinite" stopover (rule)! I assume with this new program JFK-LIM-CUZ-SCL-IPC-SCL-EZE-JFK all on one 80k J ticket won't be allowed?

As far as the ex-US awards... Any way of speculating - yes, I know, it's FT's favorite word - how redemption rates may/may not change specifically to Asia/Far East?
ariyo15 is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:36 am
  #326  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,847
Originally Posted by Boraxo
I do find it interesting that the redemption levels are dropping for LHR-JFK. It begs the question of whether this will apply to all TATL routes, i.e. including ORD and SFO, or just to JFK.
I think we already know not all tatl routes will be affected: there will be different zones for East and West Coast and the West coast will not be lower than now. What we do not yet know is where the line between the zones will be drawn exactly.
NickB is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:38 am
  #327  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
500k
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Silver again, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,490
Originally Posted by abcx
Excuse my cynicism, but I think all of you who are cheerleading right now will come to regret it. Think about it. Why aren't they telling us the whole award chart right now? Why did they just release the good news?
I recommend the use of a tin-foil hat to absorb the negative reactions. This may help. If not, I suggest you consider flying with a different carrier.

Are you by any chance a Chase reward holder? Just asking, in a casual and friendly manner.
T8191 is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:39 am
  #328  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
150 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SE1, London & White River, South Africa
Posts: 24,597
Originally Posted by Boraxo
Don't want to rain on your party, but I can't think of a major airline mileage program announcement in recent years that has significant positive news. There are almost always takeaways, and a few if any added perks.

In this instance if miles = avios, then this is just being used as a smokescreen for the devaluation (or increased cost) on the TLV, Mauritius, Larnaca and other routes. I would expect further devaluation to follow on other routes after this is introduced, which makes sense given the massive amount of miles BA is distriburing via Chase.
Let's see in November. You can't please all of the people all of the time but you can please most of the people most of the time.
Swanhunter is online now  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:40 am
  #329  
IMH
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Berlin
Programs: LH SEN, BA Gold, SK Gold; Accor Diamond; IHG Diamond-Amb; Meli/HH/Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 5,682
Originally Posted by abcx
Why did they just release the good news?
They didn't only release "good news". They've told us that some redemptions are going to be more expensive and they've certainly given Airmiles customers some bad news. Oh yes, and they've admitted that they really are intending to call the things "Avios".
IMH is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011 | 11:41 am
  #330  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,045
Originally Posted by NickB
Currently, on ATH-LAX (or other zone 3 destinations like IST, KBP, etc...), you MFU from WT+ to CW for 32.5K return
In the future, it will be:
25K to MFU LHR-LAX return
plus
20K to MFU ATH-LHR return

So a total of 45K for what used to cost 32.5K. True, you do not have to upgrade ATH-LHR and you can sit in economy instead (which, I suspect, most will given the high cost of upgrade for the relatively low added value).

Ex zone 1, however the cost was exactly the same as ex UK so there cannot be any saving by flying the intra-European connector in Y. It is a pure additional cost (or, if you prefer, a pure downgrade from CE to Y on the connecting leg).
Presumably, JER will be treated the same as other European zone 1 destinations rather than domestic since it is already treated that way for product purposes and the JER-LON connector will now be in Y for WT+ to CW MFUs unless you want to fork out an additional 9K.

but will it really cost 20k to upgrade the feeder flight?
You are paying for a WTP ticket even if that class doesn't exist shorthaul.
Something which has to be clarified.

I can imagine someone flying from zone 3 might want to upgrade the feeder flight, but if it's going to cost that much they're the real loosers.

Besides, if 20k is correct MFU ATH-LHR would cost the same as LHR-JFK

Last edited by Hannibal Lecter; Sep 1, 2011 at 11:48 am
Hannibal Lecter is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.