Hotels and Resorts that used to be Amans
#2


Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
Never found a comprehensive list.
The ones I know are:
* Carcosa Seri Negara (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
* Mahakua Hacienda de San Antonio (Colima, Mexico)
* Chateau de Bagnols (Bagnols, France)
* The Strand (Yangon, Myanmar)
* Milton Park (Australia)
AFAIK, most still are hotels, with different management.
What happened each time I guess is that owners expect a better ROI (including refusing to invest more in the property), and/or want their historically significant properties managed by a local company.
The ones I know are:
* Carcosa Seri Negara (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
* Mahakua Hacienda de San Antonio (Colima, Mexico)
* Chateau de Bagnols (Bagnols, France)
* The Strand (Yangon, Myanmar)
* Milton Park (Australia)
AFAIK, most still are hotels, with different management.
What happened each time I guess is that owners expect a better ROI (including refusing to invest more in the property), and/or want their historically significant properties managed by a local company.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,871
not sure what (google) search terms to suggest ("former"?) but lots of discussion in aman threads, and sometimes other threads - recently india IIRC. (re umaid bhawan)
...
it could also be aman making the decision.
with owners id think itd be more an issue of management decisions, not just when its about money. and of course management fees are always an issue, like FS etc. or in terms of metrics - not wanting to wait, or wanting increased occupancy.
thinking about metrics, maybe there was a difference between aman owned and managed.. that would actually be a valid point, to a certain degree.

2000 - revenue $61MM ebitda $30MM (ebitda per room = $75K, vs $4K for FS)
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/13610023-post102.html
...
it could also be aman making the decision.
with owners id think itd be more an issue of management decisions, not just when its about money. and of course management fees are always an issue, like FS etc. or in terms of metrics - not wanting to wait, or wanting increased occupancy.
thinking about metrics, maybe there was a difference between aman owned and managed.. that would actually be a valid point, to a certain degree.

2000 - revenue $61MM ebitda $30MM (ebitda per room = $75K, vs $4K for FS)
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/13610023-post102.html
Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Oct 14, 2010 at 4:58 am
#4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
* Carcosa Seri Negara (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
* Mahakua Hacienda de San Antonio (Colima, Mexico)
* Chateau de Bagnols (Bagnols, France)
* The Strand (Yangon, Myanmar)
* Milton Park (Bowral, Australia)
* Umaid Bhawan Palace (Jodhpur India)
What do all these ex-Amans have in common? They are all historic properties. Aman has never lost a new-build.
* Mahakua Hacienda de San Antonio (Colima, Mexico)
* Chateau de Bagnols (Bagnols, France)
* The Strand (Yangon, Myanmar)
* Milton Park (Bowral, Australia)
* Umaid Bhawan Palace (Jodhpur India)
What do all these ex-Amans have in common? They are all historic properties. Aman has never lost a new-build.
#5
Original Poster

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
* Carcosa Seri Negara (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
* Mahakua Hacienda de San Antonio (Colima, Mexico)
* Chateau de Bagnols (Bagnols, France)
* The Strand (Yangon, Myanmar)
* Milton Park (Bowral, Australia)
* Umaid Bhawan Palace (Jodhpur India)
What do all these ex-Amans have in common? They are all historic properties. Aman has never lost a new-build.
* Mahakua Hacienda de San Antonio (Colima, Mexico)
* Chateau de Bagnols (Bagnols, France)
* The Strand (Yangon, Myanmar)
* Milton Park (Bowral, Australia)
* Umaid Bhawan Palace (Jodhpur India)
What do all these ex-Amans have in common? They are all historic properties. Aman has never lost a new-build.
#6
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
The Strand, when it opened, was unique in Myanmar, but perhaps not up to Aman standards, which is probably why it was demoted to GHM.
#7


Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
On the other hand, it may also be they never dared the shame of letting go of an AmanXXX despite its flaws, i.e. they only got rid of what they could get rid of without damaging their image
#8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
To be fair, they all left Aman for entirely different reasons, but Aman definitely has a much better track record with custom builds.
* Carcosa Seri Negara (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) - Government owned. Huge problems with getting investment for maintenance - torn table cloths, etc etc. Aman passed it on to GHM, who I hear had similar problems. Aman has to equal quality or it is not an Aman.
* Mahakua Hacienda de San Antonio (Colima, Mexico) - The owning Goldsmith family felt that Aman were not attracting sufficient number of guests. Sadly, at the time of losing the management contract, the number of guests had starrted to rise. One wonders how well the Goldsmiths have done operating it themselves! Biggest problem was that Aman did not have a second resort for its guests, who all wanted a beach destination.
* Chateau de Bagnols (Bagnols, France).
Owned at that time by Lord & Lady Hamlyn, who had quite a say in the running of the property. Suspect a clash of personalities. Also, Lady H insisted on vetting the GM and only ever got on with Ex-Rafael GM, Hans Zimmermann. Aman lost the contract after Zimmermann retired.
* The Strand (Yangon, Myanmar)
Not sufficiently Aman in standard, so passed it on to GHM.
* Milton Park (Bowral, Australia).
Long time ago, but think it was all about low occupancy and the usual Australian unwillingness to invest in on-going quality.
* Umaid Bhawan Palace (Jodhpur India).
Owner Maharajah of Jodhpur still great friends with opening GM Franois Richli, but felt that Aman wanted to change too much, like knocking down walls. Not really done in an historic property. It was never really suited to being an Aman.
* Carcosa Seri Negara (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) - Government owned. Huge problems with getting investment for maintenance - torn table cloths, etc etc. Aman passed it on to GHM, who I hear had similar problems. Aman has to equal quality or it is not an Aman.
* Mahakua Hacienda de San Antonio (Colima, Mexico) - The owning Goldsmith family felt that Aman were not attracting sufficient number of guests. Sadly, at the time of losing the management contract, the number of guests had starrted to rise. One wonders how well the Goldsmiths have done operating it themselves! Biggest problem was that Aman did not have a second resort for its guests, who all wanted a beach destination.
* Chateau de Bagnols (Bagnols, France).
Owned at that time by Lord & Lady Hamlyn, who had quite a say in the running of the property. Suspect a clash of personalities. Also, Lady H insisted on vetting the GM and only ever got on with Ex-Rafael GM, Hans Zimmermann. Aman lost the contract after Zimmermann retired.
* The Strand (Yangon, Myanmar)
Not sufficiently Aman in standard, so passed it on to GHM.
* Milton Park (Bowral, Australia).
Long time ago, but think it was all about low occupancy and the usual Australian unwillingness to invest in on-going quality.
* Umaid Bhawan Palace (Jodhpur India).
Owner Maharajah of Jodhpur still great friends with opening GM Franois Richli, but felt that Aman wanted to change too much, like knocking down walls. Not really done in an historic property. It was never really suited to being an Aman.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,165
#15
Join Date: Apr 2011
Programs: We love to Fly, Hotels and Discovery
Posts: 1,471
GHM has pulled out of The Strand.
http://www.ghmhotels.com/strand-holding-page.php
http://www.ghmhotels.com/strand-holding-page.php






I was there in 1980 so much later