Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

"Situation" in which Captain insisted I change clothes needs advice from FT members.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"Situation" in which Captain insisted I change clothes needs advice from FT members.

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 7:34 pm
  #166  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Melbourne Australia
Programs: United (1K/MM2), Alaska MVPG, Hyatt GP-Diamond
Posts: 46
Originally Posted by swixo
Sounds like you insisted twice. A big no-no on an airplane - arguing with the pilot. FWIW, I think track-shorts are too casual. I change as well, but into track pants.

My suggestion is drop it - you were over the line.

s
I think the pilot was pretty unprofessional and in most cases it should be left to the flight attendants to sort out an attire issue. It seems a little below a pilots role to worry about what someones wearing. Obviously it's his flight and he has the final say but to come off the flight deck for someone wearing shorts? Sorta like a doctor leaving the O.R. to fill a prescription. And he lost his cool? The pilots I know are cool-calm all the time, ice cold. If a guy in shorts can set him off, should he be flying?

Regarding attire in business and first...

I fly international from Australia often (US, HK, London, China) and I think it's ok to change into some form of sleepwear if it's an overnight flight and you're planning to sleep.

I hear ya on the planes being hot-as... I use a thin black Adidas track suit (pants and top) and only change after the meal service, before bed. If it's a domestic or a day flight then I think it's more appropriate to stay in business / first class attire.

I think the shorts are over the line, just get some thin track pants. No one wants to see your legs, even if it's only going to and from the lav.


All in all I think it's pretty sad the way people dress in biz and first. Jeans are OK these days but they should be the nicer dressy style ones they have now. Also, put on a button up collared shirt, no excuse for a t-shirt or polo.

No trainers (tennis shoes) either. I'm american myself but what is it with the middle aged american guys and the white New Balance or Costco Court Classic shoes? It's like the un-offical uniform (old jeans, white trainers and a vendor-logo polo shirt).

It didn't used to bother me as much, but after living out of the U.S. for a few years you realize the rest of the world dresses a little more to the occasion.
It doesn't take much effort to look up to date and nice.

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Sep 23, 2010 at 12:25 am Reason: off-topic content removed; please do not attempt to re-post it
tkruger206 is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 7:37 pm
  #167  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,182
Welcome to FT, tkruger206!

Originally Posted by tkruger206
All in all I think it's pretty sad the way people dress in biz and first. Jeans are OK these days but they should be the nicer dressy style ones they have now. Also, put on a button up collared shirt, no excuse for a t-shirt or polo.
It's truly sad that people actually care what other people wear. Sorry, but if what I wear is a problem, it's your problem, not mine. Collared shirts are inherently uncomfortable, so I'm not about to wear one just to please another passenger. And I only wear dress shoes when I go dancing.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 7:38 pm
  #168  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,588
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
But where?
Where should they wear their speedos? In the usual position, of course. Not as headgear, please.
izzik is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 8:01 pm
  #169  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SNA
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum
Posts: 529
At least it wasn't a tank top. I hate when people wear that on planes.
UALpremier is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 8:05 pm
  #170  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Originally Posted by izzik
Personally I think everyone should wear a speedo on long-haul flights.
This way, there wouldn't be any more complaints about being "too casual".
Would certainly make it much easier going through those security checkpoints.
tom911 is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 8:15 pm
  #171  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Programs: UA
Posts: 1,776
Why do so many people here have nothing better to do then to check out and complain what others are wearing ?
I don't care and usually don't even bother looking who is flying on the same plane and could care less what clothes they have on.
If somebody's dress code bothers you look away.
German Expat is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 8:18 pm
  #172  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 41,216
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
..Either one would have been appropriate, though filing charged in Switzerland would probably have been much more inconvenient.
Not inconvenient but merely impossible. Grabbing a fire extinguisher and clubbing the OP that would be 'battery' in Switzerland. Softly poking someone's belly without any hope of finding forensic evidence of the action would a best trigger an alienated smile from the authorities and at worst an in-depth psychiatric evaluation if you are fit fly.
Originally Posted by ekys
Out of interest, does the attire issue thing tend to be gender biased?
..
The first was in coach SFO-SYD, a young woman, maybe 20 years of age had dressed down to boxer shorts, a thin baggy white shoulderless vest and socks. She was at least wearing a bra under the vest, I only know this because you could plainly see it as the vest was so low cut under the arms and at the back...
Yes ... and this is on the way to Australia, so it qualifies as perfectly businessy attire, I reckon.
Originally Posted by DUflyer
..Is anyone going to be offended if I watch an inflight movie or would any FA or pilot ever ask me to change channel...
We had numerous threads on channels being shut down because owner of kids being offended by actions depicted in some movie.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Sep 22, 2010 at 3:54 am Reason: response to deleted quote
weero is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 8:36 pm
  #173  
30 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: Marriott Ambassador, UA Mileage Plus 1K, AA Executive Plat, Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,797
regardless if the pilot thought the traveler was a non-rev, the pilots or flight attendants are not given the right to make sure non-rev dress codes are followed. That policy is given to the gate agent.

And starting October 1, the dress code on UA basically goes away for non-rev travel as it merges with the current CO dress code. (however, track suits from GLEE are still not allowed)
CALMSP is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 9:28 pm
  #174  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by ryan182
So what did the cops end up doing? Seems interesting that the cops were involved but did nothing but take information? If the OP was assaulted why not have the captain arrested? Would be interesting to hear the other side on this one.
I'm surprised to see the number of comments on my problem.

The cops were clearly unsure if they even had jurisdiction, and I didn't know either. One of my colleagues opined that since we were past outbound passport checks, that US law would govern. And another passenger pointed out that just recently a Chicago-based lawfirm is suing Qantas for a flight that had mechanical problems that scared the hell out of the passengers - IN AUSTRALIA. In any event I wanted to be sure that the pilot was identified, for as already pointed out, any physical contact is a battery.

The agents in GVA are "rentals" from Swissair, and I never saw any UA attired agent anywhere, so I didn't bother to ask for one. And the pilot's eyes made it clear that he wasn't in the mood to be questioned on the issue. I quickly decided my best course of action would be on the ground at IAD.

And, like most 767's in my experience, the temperature was very warm the whole flight. Even more so with me "in the bag", so to speak.

Originally Posted by Rpcfly
One would think that. The OP said he was returning from a Conference so I doubt he was using any "free" ticket. OP?
No "free" ticket. Just a company (MY company) purchased ticket with a SWU burned to upgrade.

Originally Posted by fttc
Of course he doesn't need a reason. But there will be consequences. Just like if police arrest someone without cause. There will be complaint and whatever counter action that's appropriate.
It was exactly this thought that caused me to acquiesce to this captain's demand so quickly. Overseas in a foreign airport with no UA employees readily available, plane ready to depart, and a captain who had already "baited" me by poking me made any actions by me more like Custer's last stand.

One other interesting point - the immigration line on arrival at IAD was extremely long at this time of day, and of course the crew uses a special line to bypass the passenger queue. I was able to bypass the queue and get to the police prior to the crew coming the immigration because I hold an APEC card that utilizes the same bypass lane. It would have been very difficult to find any UA management or police until one gets thru the immigration lines.

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Sep 21, 2010 at 9:45 pm Reason: multi-quote
BrianOz is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 9:37 pm
  #175  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,655
Originally Posted by tkruger206

I think the shorts are over the line, just get some thin track pants. No one wants to see your legs, even if it's only going to and from the lav.
So women shouldn't wear skirts? Or you think every one objects to male legs but not female legs?

Re: the trainers. My feet swell on longhauls. I'm not spending serious money on a pair of good shoes that are over-sized enough for a flight but too loose to wear on the street. I compromise on trainers.

Originally Posted by tom911
Would certainly make it much easier going through those security checkpoints.
You beat me to it. Speedos = fast frisk at the checkpoint!

(I don't know why, but I think even the most hard-core gropers might be put off by the 'eew' in-your-face speedo factor)

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Sep 21, 2010 at 9:45 pm Reason: multi-quote
chollie is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 9:44 pm
  #176  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: DEN
Programs: Hyatt Plat, SPG Plat, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, AA EXP, Delta Plat, UA 1K, Avis Presidents
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by tkruger206
All in all I think it's pretty sad the way people dress in biz and first. Jeans are OK these days but they should be the nicer dressy style ones they have now. Also, put on a button up collared shirt, no excuse for a t-shirt or polo.

No trainers (tennis shoes) either. I'm american myself but what is it with the middle aged american guys and the white New Balance or Costco Court Classic shoes? It's like the un-offical uniform (old jeans, white trainers and a vendor-logo polo shirt).
Last I checked there wasn't an official dress code. Dress to impress if it makes you comfortable, dress with no stress if it does the same. You should be able to dress as you wish as long as
1) Not indecent
2) No odors
3) Not noisy
4) No intentionally offense words/pictures/logos
If the pilot doesn't like it, it's fair for him to mention it, but it's not fair for him to force it. Show me an FAA regulation saying business casual for F. Poking is out of line, but I doubt trying to press charges would get you anywhere, it's probably better to keep it internal to United for max value on your compensation. And it's very likely you will get decent compensation if you push it. Try to get the pilot fired though, I'm sure word would spread in the pilot ranks and that'd help spare the rest of us an experience like this.
Cmon is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 9:45 pm
  #177  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SNA
Programs: AA EXP, UA 1K (until it expires then never again), *wood Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 9,315
Thanks for following up, so what do you intend to do next? Personally I would pursue a criminal complaint, I have no doubt whatsoever that if you had poked the captain he'd have had you arrested and sooner or later these people need to get it through their over inflated heads: they are not special and not above the law. Period.
ryan182 is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 9:54 pm
  #178  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by ryan182
Thanks for following up, so what do you intend to do next? Personally I would pursue a criminal complaint, I have no doubt whatsoever that if you had poked the captain he'd have had you arrested
This morning early (the whole incident has had me all agitated since it happened) I wrote Tilton and another senior UA management employee with a long explanation of the incident, as well as my Chicago phone contact. I've heard nothing today, so I'm planning to follow up tomorrow on the phone (if I can find a number that actually gets to management employees in Chicago).
BrianOz is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 10:00 pm
  #179  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,182
Originally Posted by weero
Softly poking someone's belly
I don't recall anyone saying it was either soft or in the belly. I pictured more a firm poke to the chest, with definite intent to cause discomfort.

Originally Posted by weero
at worst an in-depth psychiatric evaluation if you are fit fly.
Someone in this event is definitely due for a phychiatric examination (and anger management classes), and it's not the passenger.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 10:04 pm
  #180  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
Originally Posted by BrianOz
This morning early (the whole incident has had me all agitated since it happened) I wrote Tilton and another senior UA management employee with a long explanation of the incident, as well as my Chicago phone contact. I've heard nothing today, so I'm planning to follow up tomorrow on the phone (if I can find a number that actually gets to management employees in Chicago).
I'd ease up on the whole poking thing. While I suppose it technically could be called battery (and I hope you have witnesses), if I were called to jury duty to find a case involving a passenger whining about being poked with a finger, I'd probably acquit just because of the annoyance. Just focus on the actual part, the clothing, maybe the poke thing (again, only if you have a witness willing to back you up) only parenthetically.

But if I were UA I would probably tell you it is the captains ship, and if he thought your dress was inappropriate, we back him up.
flyinbob is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.