FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   SAS | EuroBonus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/sas-eurobonus-499/)
-   -   Distance between LHR and ARN [type 1 EC261/2004?] (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/sas-eurobonus/1898193-distance-between-lhr-arn-type-1-ec261-2004-a.html)

tobiashenry Mar 11, 2018 10:29 am

Distance between LHR and ARN [type 1 EC261/2004?]
 
I just received a reply rom SAS denying my EC261/2004 request. The reason was

"Kindly note that according to EU regulation 261/2004 compensation is paid out when delay is three hours or more. In your case delay is less than three hours (2h 05min), therefore we are sorry to say but cannot honor your claim. We do hope that you will choose SAS for your upcoming flights as your valued costumer....."

I thought the shortest, great circle distance between LHR and ARN is 792 nm, 1466 km, so I thought type 1 in Article 8 in EC261/2004 should apply?

fransknorge Mar 11, 2018 11:40 am

You are correct.

CPH-Flyer Mar 11, 2018 7:18 pm

SK may going by the IATA published distances by city pairs. These are not exactly equivalent to the great circle mapping for the city pairs. JAL uses the IATA distances, and as a result Tokyo to London is a longer flight than Tokyo to Paris, and both of them (or all four of them as Tokyo can mean both Haneda and Narita) are longer than the great circle track. I would imagine that as the IATA numbers are an industry standard that would be accepted as a calculation base if that is where the problem come from.

All that being said, I would query SK why they set ARN to LHR as a category two flight if it was me.

oliver2002 Mar 12, 2018 2:28 am

Its 863mi(1388 KM) as per IATA:

Code:

fqmlhrarn
FQM  LON  STO                                                               
                                                                               
CTY  DC  TPM  CUM  MPM  DC LVL  <HGL  >LWL  25M  XTRA                     
LON 2                                                                         
STO 2 EH  863  863  1035  EH  0M  172    0  1293    0                     
>                                                PAGE  1/ 1


fransknorge Mar 12, 2018 2:50 am


Originally Posted by CPH-Flyer (Post 29512640)
SK may going by the IATA published distances by city pairs. These are not exactly equivalent to the great circle mapping for the city pairs. JAL uses the IATA distances, and as a result Tokyo to London is a longer flight than Tokyo to Paris, and both of them (or all four of them as Tokyo can mean both Haneda and Narita) are longer than the great circle track. I would imagine that as the IATA numbers are an industry standard that would be accepted as a calculation base if that is where the problem come from.

All that being said, I would query SK why they set ARN to LHR as a category two flight if it was me.

Interesting, I was not aware of this. I guess it does make sense to have some official/standard distance between city pairs.

palcsaky Mar 12, 2018 3:20 am

Regardless of how they count the distance, whether it's LON-STO or LHR-ARN, your flight is type 1 (1500km or less). The eligibility for compensation depends on whether you were rerouted or whether you took the original flight which was delayed. If you were rerouted and, in case of type 1 flight, arrived 2+ hrs later than originally scheduled you would be entitled to 250 eur compensation. This amount is halved if the arrival time is with a delay of less than 2 hrs. If you took the original flight and arrived with a delay of less than 3 hours, you would not be entitled to any compensation, only to duty of care whilst delayed.

CPH-Flyer Mar 12, 2018 3:35 am


Originally Posted by oliver2002 (Post 29513573)
Its 863mi(1388 KM) as per IATA:
Code:

fqmlhrarn
Code:

FQM LON STO

CTY DC TPM CUM MPM DC LVL <HGL >LWL 25M XTRA
LON 2
STO 2 EH 863 863 1035 EH 0M 172 0 1293 0
> PAGE 1/ 1


Just out of curiosity, what are the various numbers apart from the distance?

Strangely enough IATA sets it shorter than the great circle distance. Interesting.

oliver2002 Mar 12, 2018 6:00 am

See page 6 of this pdf: http://www.amadeus.com/pk/documents/...%20Pricing.pdf

Usually a shorter TPM is better for you when you try to squeeze in segments under a MPM limit...

CPH-Flyer Mar 12, 2018 6:49 am


Originally Posted by oliver2002 (Post 29513955)
See page 6 of this pdf: http://www.amadeus.com/pk/documents/...%20Pricing.pdf

Usually a shorter TPM is better for you when you try to squeeze in segments under a MPM limit...

Thank you :)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:35 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.