Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > San Francisco
Reload this Page >

Observations on the San Francisco metro area currently?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Observations on the San Francisco metro area currently?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2022, 10:37 am
  #91  
mjm
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Tokyo, Japan (or Vienna whenever possible)
Posts: 6,379
Originally Posted by invisible
I lived in Pleasanton up to 2004. BART station was 15 min walk from my apartment. A number of times I was taking it to the City and all the way to SFO when the station was added in 2003 and it was great. The latter option was the cheapest deal you could get - you would burn more gas on one-way driving (not even counting San Mateo bridge toll) on the same route.

My last BART experience was from 2011 from Oakland to the city and I have no desire ever to step my foot in it again.
Exactly. I used to love grabbing a dirt cheap rate at the Embassy Suites Walnut Creek and BARTing into the City. Not only was it close to home for me (just the other side of the tunnel) but $100 rates were frequent. No more. Have to stay down by the airport to get those rates now and rent a car. Wine nights require Uber.
mjm is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2022, 10:40 am
  #92  
mjm
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Tokyo, Japan (or Vienna whenever possible)
Posts: 6,379
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
It is hard to believe that BART transbay service was only 9 years old when I moved to SF. It was a source of pride to ride when visitors came.

I do walk in Downtown/Uptown Oakland at night, with the streetsmarts I gained when living in the Tenderloin, back when BART was a good way to travel. I also take the bus, which at times provides for very low covercharge entertainment.
It was the pride of so many on the Bay Area. The raised tracks and how they did that and then later the tunnel, nobody could believe it as we all imagined the Disneyland submarine ride. But AC Transit and endless transfers were my bread and butter. The F into the city, the 15 to down by your place, the 51 or 33 into Oakland, oh yeah that was a time. The blue tiles of Oakland BART still remain a very strong memory for me. Right into the basement of Capwells.
mjm is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2022, 5:02 pm
  #93  
Moderator: Hilton Honors, Practical Travel Safety Issues & San Francisco
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco CA
Programs: UA, Hilton, Priceline, AirBnB
Posts: 11,005
I wouldn’t take BART Simply because of the Covid ris that will probably still existed

Originally Posted by SandLake
The time saving and door to door simplicity are quite appealing - Thank you for the insight.
There are other good reasons to choose Uber, Lyft or even wingz (The latter needing to be booked in advance) as the cost savings will not be as substantial as you might think. If you take Uber or Lyft, even if you are delayed in traffic it won’t change the fare.

But I find riding public transport around the bay area rather unpleasant since Covid as many people have not followed and continued not to follow masking and other requirements. I don’t think public transport is really unsafe, but it can be rather unpleasant.
squeakr is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2022, 9:06 pm
  #94  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,721
Originally Posted by Kacee
I live two blocks away from 19th Street BART. It's unsafe after dark (and sketchy most of the day as well). There's no way I'd let my girlfriend or my mother walk from the BART station to my apartment unescorted.

(And my father's family moved to Oakland after the 1906 earthquake.)
Small world, my grandpa was an infant when his (my) family moved across the bay to Oakland after the 1906 quake. And for many years my grandfathers office was at 19th & Franklin after he moved from the Tribune tower.

with our respective bonfides now firmly established I concur 100% that it is not safe to walk from BART downtown Oakland after dark. Downtown SF is far safer, though things are so bad there that the Mayor is now adopting a law and order platform to clear the streets of vagrants.

if people want cheap hotels just stay near SFO or Pleasanton and take BART into the city. I find sub-$100/nt rates often at chain properties in both locations. You’ll be giving up precious hours commuting and will have to plug your nose on BART, but if you have more time than $$$…
nnn and Kacee like this.
Boraxo is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2022, 11:11 pm
  #95  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SF CA USA. I love large faceless corporations. And they cherish me in return (sometimes). ;)
Programs: UA Premier Gold/disappointed 1MM, HH Gold, IHG Plat, MB Gold, BW Diam Sel
Posts: 17,575
Although public transportation does present some COVID transmission risk (esp. if there are riders not wearing masks -- though on my few public transit rides during COVID, I have not seen any), it seems to me that the same risks exist on taxi/Uber/Lyft/etc. How many maskless riders have ridden in the vehicle before you, possibly carrying the virus and coughing and sneezing up a storm?
KathyWdrf is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2022, 11:26 pm
  #96  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,459
Originally Posted by squeakr
But I find riding public transport around the bay area rather unpleasant since Covid as many people have not followed and continued not to follow masking and other requirements. I don’t think public transport is really unsafe, but it can be rather unpleasant.
Agreed. I try to pick a car with no homeless people passed out, and it can be really difficult. This is certainly a consideration for me in choosing between BART ($10, 50 minutes, no traffic risk) and Uber/Lyft Black ($115, 25-30 minutes when there's no traffic). While I have sympathy for those who find a heated BART car the most comfortable place to crash, particularly during rainy season, it is a very sad comment that our society's inability to take care of its own has created a situation which dissuades many from taking public transit.
Boraxo, nnn and ewoo like this.
Kacee is online now  
Old Jan 5, 2022, 10:31 am
  #97  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
Originally Posted by Boraxo
Small world, my grandpa was an infant when his (my) family moved across the bay to Oakland after the 1906 quake. And for many years my grandfathers office was at 19th & Franklin after he moved from the Tribune tower.

with our respective bonfides now firmly established I concur 100% that it is not safe to walk from BART downtown Oakland after dark. Downtown SF is far safer, though things are so bad there that the Mayor is now adopting a law and order platform to clear the streets of vagrants.

if people want cheap hotels just stay near SFO or Pleasanton and take BART into the city. I find sub-$100/nt rates often at chain properties in both locations. You’ll be giving up precious hours commuting and will have to plug your nose on BART, but if you have more time than $$$…
I don't know if ancestral roots in the city for a resident of nearby rich, white suburb with exactly counts as "bonafides" in the way you intend here. Danville exists as it does because white people thought (and continue to think) Oakland is too dangerous. It's Danville's raison d'être.
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2022, 3:15 pm
  #98  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,633
Originally Posted by ucdtim17
I don't know if ancestral roots in the city for a resident of nearby rich, white suburb with exactly counts as "bonafides" in the way you intend here. Danville exists as it does because white people thought (and continue to think) Oakland is too dangerous. It's Danville's raison d'être.
It is Danville's reason for suburban sprawl McMansions, and perhaps the raison d’être of the current population, but unlike a lot of SoCal, most of the Bay Area cities have a long history that predates the urban decay causing "white flight."

Give me Oakland any day over Danville. I wouldn't be surprised if Danville once prohibited Negroes, Hebrews and Yellows.
Eastbay1K is online now  
Old Jan 5, 2022, 3:43 pm
  #99  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
The drive to incorporate came from people involved in the Danville Association, a homeowners and business owners group which began in 1978. It had these goals: To conserve the natural beauty of Danville, to encourage orderly planning, and to encourage measures for the safety and general well-being of Danville residents.
https://museumsrv.org/post-1380/

You can just imagine what members of this "homeowners and business owners group" thought about Oakland in 1980
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2022, 5:26 pm
  #100  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,459
No one should be throwing stones here. My mom's block in North Berkeley is subject to restrictive racial covenants, as is most of Claremont and Upper Rockridge (which have of course been unenforceable since the 1948 decision in Shelley v. Kraemer).
Kacee is online now  
Old Jan 5, 2022, 7:48 pm
  #101  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,633
Originally Posted by Kacee
No one should be throwing stones here. My mom's block in North Berkeley is subject to restrictive racial covenants, as is most of Claremont and Upper Rockridge (which have of course been unenforceable since the 1948 decision in Shelley v. Kraemer).
No stone throwing. At least my now gentrified area of Berkeley wasn't worthy of said covenants once upon a time.

And back to the topic at hand, I'd say that most of the neighborhoods that don't rely on daily business traffic for livelihood are in pretty good shape, and those that do are the current places to avoid.
Boraxo likes this.
Eastbay1K is online now  
Old Jan 6, 2022, 8:54 pm
  #102  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Programs: GM on VX, UA, AA, HA, AS, SY; Budget Fastbreak
Posts: 27,612
Originally Posted by invisible
My last BART experience was from 2011 from Oakland to the city and I have no desire ever to step my foot in it again.
i took Bart in December and it was fine. Daytime. Masked. 24th to Oakland 19th and back.
I last took Bart at evening in 2019 - Bart to the Oakland stop for jack London square. Then Uber from Bart to my venue - 5 minute car ride because I wasn’t going to walk there at night.

Originally Posted by mjm
Exactly. I used to love grabbing a dirt cheap rate at the Embassy Suites Walnut Creek and BARTing into the City. Not only was it close to home for me (just the other side of the tunnel) but $100 rates were frequent. No more. Have to stay down by the airport to get those rates now and rent a car. Wine nights require Uber.
I ride share or taxi anytime I’m going out and having anything to drink. My next expected night out is Rebecca black on 1/20. I’ll rideshare there from my house.
gaobest is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2022, 11:57 pm
  #103  
mjm
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Tokyo, Japan (or Vienna whenever possible)
Posts: 6,379
Originally Posted by gaobest
I ride share or taxi anytime I’m going out and having anything to drink. My next expected night out is Rebecca black on 1/20. I’ll rideshare there from my house.
Oh my, I miss going to shows. Have fun! Down there by the Rickshaw though is definitely an Uber destination for me. Up until a year ago I was using a clinic just below Market on Van Ness and it is a "choice" neighborhood even in the daytime.
mjm is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2022, 2:02 am
  #104  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Programs: GM on VX, UA, AA, HA, AS, SY; Budget Fastbreak
Posts: 27,612
Originally Posted by mjm
Oh my, I miss going to shows. Have fun! Down there by the Rickshaw though is definitely an Uber destination for me. Up until a year ago I was using a clinic just below Market on Van Ness and it is a "choice" neighborhood even in the daytime.
Hayes valley is nice. The donut shop at market & van Ness is very good - good $1.25 donuts whereas Johnny doughnuts are $4 apiece.
gaobest is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2022, 2:44 am
  #105  
mjm
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Tokyo, Japan (or Vienna whenever possible)
Posts: 6,379
Originally Posted by gaobest
Hayes valley is nice. The donut shop at market & van Ness is very good - good $1.25 donuts whereas Johnny doughnuts are $4 apiece.

Indeed, I like the cafe culture in that area.
mjm is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.