Is there no Starbucks at SFO T3 airside?
Suffered through a cup of Peet’s “coffee” this morning and don’t want to experience that again. Thanks |
Wow. Them's fighting words in San Francisco.
But in any event, I believe the answer is no. SFO's airside eateries are generally locally owned AFAIK, and Starbucks is not. |
Originally Posted by nnn
(Post 30484329)
Wow. Them's fighting words in San Francisco.
But in any event, I believe the answer is no. SFO's airside eateries are generally locally owned AFAIK, and Starbucks is not. |
In fairness, Peet's has been at the airport longer than that. I assume the airport locations are franchised anyway, but don't know.
|
Originally Posted by nnn
(Post 30484329)
But in any event, I believe the answer is no. SFO's airside eateries are generally locally owned AFAIK, and Starbucks is not.
Sheesh. David |
Local francisees are allowed to have chain restos
And the BK was before the push for locally owned and operated eats.
Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 30486484)
Then what's the Burger King doing in the Terminal?
Sheesh. David |
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
(Post 30484878)
Unlike Peet's, owned by that hometown German conglomerate.
|
Originally Posted by dhuey
(Post 30498534)
You probably know that we both live near the original Peet's location. Kinda cute how many locals incorrectly believe that this is still a local business. I love Peet's, but I don't see why anyone would choose them over Starbucks for any reason other than the product offerings.
|
There is a Starbucks pre-security in T3, if you really need to, you could pop out and go back in. At least there's an option at SFO - it looks like the new OAK concessions will remove all of the airport's Starbucks to be replaced with Peet's and other coffee options. (Despite the global ownership of Peet's, Peet's HQ is still located in the East Bay, in Emeryville - while not locally-owned anymore, they still do have a local presence).
|
Originally Posted by ryw
(Post 30503500)
(Despite the global ownership of Peet's, Peet's HQ is still located in the East Bay, in Emeryville - while not locally-owned anymore, they still do have a local presence).
|
At the risk of further tilting this thread towards OMNI/PR, it's a perfect expression of the inherent contradictions of localism in a globalized world.
And I simply cannot understand why someone would want a Starbucks at all, let alone when a Peets is available. |
Originally Posted by lhrsfo
(Post 30508273)
At the risk of further tilting this thread towards OMNI/PR, it's a perfect expression of the inherent contradictions of localism in a globalized world.
And I simply cannot understand why someone would want a Starbucks at all, let alone when a Peets is available. |
If you want good coffee what are you planning to buy at SB?
|
Originally Posted by mapu
(Post 30483794)
Suffered through a cup of Peet’s “coffee” this morning and don’t want to experience that again. Thanks There's no Starsucks, for good reason ;) |
Regarding the actual coffee issue, my parents each had a "saying" that applies here, politics of airports and life aside:
"there's no accounting for taste" "that's what makes horse races" |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:50 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.