FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   S.P.A.M. (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/s-p-m-2/)
-   -   The "MAX" Thread (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/s-p-m/269289-max-thread.html)

Mary2e Jul 18, 2002 12:33 pm

The "MAX" Thread
 
The "Where's Max" thread is a great topic! I use it every day and it has saved me quite a bit of time looking for Max. Chances are I wouldn't even bother looking on a daily basis.

BUT - can we try to only list when & where he shows up & then when he's gone? While it's nice to know that he's still there it would even be nicer not to click on a very long thread only to find out that it's status quo.

Only a suggestion......

Mary

dbmaury Jul 18, 2002 5:41 pm

I second that!

Mwenenzi Jul 19, 2002 1:50 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Mary2e:
...not to click on a very long thread only to find out that it's status quo.
</font>
There is no need to click on a long thread.
Just go to the last page (page 7 at the momemt
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum.../001575-7.html

I bookmark / add to favourites the last page

I don't mind the staus quo posts especicaly if is on a new day

robvberg Jul 19, 2002 4:00 am

I also like the updates. It gives me an idea of when it was last checked. I also don't see how it takes much more time to load as long as you click on the most recent page. I also think some of the commentary and idea of time length helps the newer members to learn about how it works. The posts also keeps it at the top of SPAM which makes it stand out when active. IMHO


------------------
Robert

dingo Jul 20, 2002 11:51 am

Disagree.

dingo Jul 20, 2002 11:52 am

Still disagree at noon eastern time.

dingo Jul 20, 2002 12:14 pm


Still disagree.

robvberg Jul 20, 2002 7:23 pm

Dingo, I think you have made our point. Without the updates we might think that you had potentially changed your mind.

------------------
Robert

dingo Jul 21, 2002 10:51 am

Go big red! Any chance at the Skers starting someone other than Lord at QB this year?

robvberg Jul 22, 2002 1:52 pm

Probably not until a screw up. Nothing against Lord but he was a backup for too long. He has even said that it was very tough for him to be focused and push himself when he knew there was no way he could start. He says things are different now, but 3 years making mistakes will be hard to break I think. We have some very competitive people chasing his spot, so by midseason who knows?

------------------
Robert

dingo Jul 22, 2002 4:12 pm

I'll be back for the ASU game I was hoping he'd already be benched in favor of the kid from the NC area (Dukes I believe). Easier to take a down year if you've got a young QB in there than a grisled bench warmer.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.