Originally Posted by og
(Post 20062019)
That's good news. BUT, does this mean a later start to breakfast - say 1.5 hrs before arrival instead of the current 2 hrs?
|
Originally Posted by eoinnz
(Post 20064176)
Even quicker - 1hr 15min (45 minutes before decent)
|
Originally Posted by og
(Post 20064872)
Good news again. Perhaps this is the first real reason to return to QF for the overnight flight. Now if we could only have a few extra toilets so everyone can change out of their PJs in time for landing :)
But I'd still rather lose a lav if it means having the lie-flats . (And I'm still amazed at how few people in J or F on other airlines get changed into some form of sleeping kit when PJs not supplied. Admittedly its a bit more in the carry-on, but I take my own sleeping gear even on QF - QR PJ trousers and a baggy T shirt :) ) |
Originally Posted by RooFlyer
(Post 20069241)
(And I'm still amazed at how few people in J or F on other airlines get changed into some form of sleeping kit when PJs not supplied. Admittedly its a bit more in the carry-on, but I take my own sleeping gear even on QF - QR PJ trousers and a baggy T shirt :) ) |
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
(Post 20069298)
Conversely I find the fascination with changing into pyjamas on aeroplanes quite strange
I personally consider them as light track suits rather than pajamas... |
I like my sleep so worst case, you will find me in my jammies temporarily in the airport but I will dive into the first toilets to adjust this fashion faux pas
|
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 20069526)
Back in the 90's they were advertised as "Oversuits".
I personally consider them as light track suits rather than pajamas... |
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
(Post 20069298)
Conversely I find the fascination with changing into pyjamas on aeroplanes quite strange
|
For me, to whom checking luggage is Anathema, they are very useful in extending the pre-wash life of the few pieces of attire I travel with.
|
I never understood the PJs until I tried them. I usually travel in jeans and a polo shirt. The PJs are significantly more comfortable and means my clothes are fresher when I disembark.
I generally leave them on board. |
Originally Posted by m0hamed
(Post 20070561)
I never understood the PJs until I tried them. I usually travel in jeans and a polo shirt. The PJs are significantly more comfortable and means my clothes are fresher when I disembark.
I generally leave them on board. * originally thought it was weird * but they are more comfy than jeans * and most importantly (for me) it keeps your clothes fresher I also leave them on board |
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
(Post 20069298)
Conversely I find the fascination with changing into pyjamas on aeroplanes quite strange
I know I look a complete dag when I'm changed, but I'm 'of an age' where I don't care two hoots and I'm much more comfortable and relaxed. Street clothes get hung up in the cupboard, out of the way. But I do admire the odd chap you see who keep their ties on the entire way on a long haul! (Maybe that's you, Dave Noble ? :) ) |
Dave Noble has stated previously in many posts the their preference is for Daytime flights where the need to sleep can be avoided.
|
Originally Posted by RooFlyer
(Post 20070773)
But I do admire the odd chap you see who keep their ties on the entire way on a long haul!
|
I love my QF PJs. The F pants are great for the flight and when they have shrunk after the first wash :mad: (cold water, dry on a clothes line - not drier), I can recycle them into fantastic cleaning rags for my bike. That saves ripping up a T shirt.
Oh, and BTW, the I never wear the PJ top and prefer a well worn T shirt instead.. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:34 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.