![]() |
Outrageous Behaviour by TSA
deleted.
|
Sorry for your experience, but....
A quick look over in the Travel Safety/Security forum will show you that this type behavior on the part of TSA employees is far from uncommon.
Unfortunately. :mad: But what does it have to do with United? Glad you made your flight in the end. ^ |
Originally Posted by n198ua
(Post 8606438)
I was later recounting this story to a FA on my flight who was horrified, and said I most certainly have a winnable law suit. My question is a) what are your thoughts?
|
Originally Posted by stanfordhokie
(Post 8606533)
My thoughts? Don't take legal advice from a FA.
But it is definitely OK to take free drinks from a lawyer. :D |
Originally Posted by tednugent(no relation)
(Post 8606536)
But it is definitely OK to take free drinks from a lawyer. :D
|
"Winnable Lawsuit." Like stated before, don't take legal advice from a FA.
Last week McDonalds left onions on my burger when I specifically asked for "No Onions." Anyone think I got a case? |
Based on what, age discrimination? I believe the law on that does not apply to you (or me for that matter) as it only kicks in after a certain age. It is perfectly legal to discriminate against the youth, just not the elderly.
But don't take legal advice from me either...I am only 1 step up from a FA because I watch Law and Order! |
I like your attitude of "really no harm was done" in our over-litigious society. Still, it might be worth a letter to TSA because the screeners' conduct appears to be outrageous. Like all government bureaucracies, TSA has a "civil rights" office (it might be at the DHS level, although TSA does have an office for matters related to screening of passengers with disabilities), and complaints about "civil rights" (in your case, it would be based both on age, because of the comment about people your age not having pacemakers and on disability or medical condition) go right to the top of the list for attention, trumping all of the other legitimate complaints about just plain rude and thuggish behavior from screeners.
To answer another question of yours, the screeners are employed strictly by TSA, so are fully unaccountable except by our political process. |
In before the move to TS&S! :D
|
Ha, right after you, Dave.
Just wanted to say, you shouldn't trust lawyers pontificating about scheduled airline service either! |
As others have stated, this belongs in the Travel Safety/Security forum. Follow it there.
iluv2fly Moderator, UA |
going going, hey where are the super mods?
|
Wow. TSA guy sounds like a fool.
I don't think you have a winnable lawsuit, because you don't have grounds to make any sort of claim. Best of luck. |
What you MAY have is an opportunity for some more unflattering media exposure of TSA behavior, if you choose to go that route with this, beyond these posts.
|
Originally Posted by mecabq
(Post 8606909)
I like your attitude of "really no harm was done" in our over-litigious society. Still, it might be worth a letter to TSA because the screeners' conduct appears to be outrageous. Like all government bureaucracies, TSA has a "civil rights" office (it might be at the DHS level, although TSA does have an office for matters related to screening of passengers with disabilities), and complaints about "civil rights" (in your case, it would be based both on age, because of the comment about people your age not having pacemakers and on disability or medical condition) go right to the top of the list for attention, trumping all of the other legitimate complaints about just plain rude and thuggish behavior from screeners.
To answer another question of yours, the screeners are employed strictly by TSA, so are fully unaccountable except by our political process. |
whether you decide to take a legal action or not, I think you should talk to
some reporters about it. |
Originally Posted by n198ua
(Post 8606438)
I have an ID card for proof, but I've never been asked for it before so it was already on its way through the scanner with my wallet and other stuff.
However, don't take my post as any way of supporting what the TSA did in this situation. |
Lawsuit? Forget it.
I would contact ORD management, perhaps the American Medical Association, and last but not least, the ground security coordinator for your airline at ORD. Don't bother with the e-mail or TSA 800 number stuff, they're only there to read boilerplate statements. |
Originally Posted by cpx
(Post 8607378)
whether you decide to take a legal action or not, I think you should talk to
some reporters about it. |
Originally Posted by bzbdewd
(Post 8607360)
If the hand wand can really impact the pace-maker I think this is a little more serious. True in this case there was no harm done but it could have been very serious and the TSA should be called on the carpet for it.
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/easnote.html Keep in mind here folks - when someone with a hand wand approaches a pacemaker implanted patient, and activates the wand near their chest, they can kill them. No harm done here, but these TSA jokers will end up getting someone killed if they ignore it when someone says they have a pacemaker. Most acts of TSA incompetence are just annoying, frankly. This one is much more serious. Still not actionable, I suspect - maybe the FA will take the case pro bono? :) |
Originally Posted by n198ua
(Post 8606438)
I began to argue, at which point he picked up that wand thing and tried to pass it over me -- still not believing I had a pacemaker. Now, I'll admit this infuriated me to the point where I yelled for him to get that f*! thing away from me, that I wasn't lying.
As a practical matter, this would take a whole lot of time and you would have missed your flight, and you probably would have had to escalate past the beat cop on the scene to get someone to take a report. |
Originally Posted by n198ua
(Post 8606438)
When I stepped up to the screener, I requested hand screening b/c of my pacemaker. The agent immediately acted "standoffish" as if I was lying, and stated "people your age don't have pacemakers!" (I'm a 18yo looking 25yo :) )
|
Originally Posted by bzbdewd
(Post 8607731)
The sad part about that is that because the OP didn't have his card in hand the media spin would likely be that it was all his fault. Such is the case when the sheep flock has the idea that these types of things only happen to those who do something wrong... and as long as they don't do anything wrong it couldn't possibly happen to them.
that could potentially be fatal shouldn't be taken lightly. Whether the OP had the ID or not, his request not to use a metal detector should not have been ignored. |
I wonder if the bad guys are onto this.
Seems like it would be a fairly simple matter to implant the explosives disguised as a pacemaker (or even a prosthetic hip joint). Over the ocean, the martyr turns on a GameBoy modified to emit a coded detonation signal, and boom.
|
Originally Posted by DevilDog438
(Post 8608318)
Report both of the wingnuts to the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation for practicing medicine without a license.
|
Originally Posted by dgolding
(Post 8608562)
You've got to be kidding me.
needs a pacemaker or not.. without a medical license... I think he/she deserves a closer look. |
I have a defibrillator and I can tell you that strong magnets can interfere with the functioning of them and pacemakers. It is important that we avoid strong electric or magnetic fields. That includes airport security wands (we are all given cards to show and and are told to request a hand search).
Forget the attorney, but I would be sending out a big fat stack of mail to other sources regarding the incident. |
Originally Posted by CessnaJock
(Post 8608499)
Seems like it would be a fairly simple matter to implant the explosives disguised as a pacemaker (or even a prosthetic hip joint). Over the ocean, the martyr turns on a GameBoy modified to emit a coded detonation signal, and boom.
OP! As Less stated, please prepare a letter for the airport director, the chair of the aviation commission, the TSA FSD and GSC for your airline. Please PM me if you need to any guidance or assistance. This is an assault which could have had dire consequences and these screeners need to be terminated. Yes, I mean terminated. |
Thank you to those of you who responded appropriately. I appreciate all the input. Since I'm an on-air meteorologist I don't think I want to draw any media attention to myself, but I will be drafting the appropriate letters w/in the next couple of days. I also want to be clear that I loathe the fact that we have become a litigation-happy nation, the only reason I even considered legal procedures was for safety reasons. This guy could kill someone, seriously.
Again, thanks for all the input. n198ua |
Originally Posted by dgolding
(Post 8608562)
You've got to be kidding me.
|
Originally Posted by n198ua
(Post 8609101)
Thank you to those of you who responded appropriately. I appreciate all the input. Since I'm an on-air meteorologist I don't think I want to draw any media attention to myself, but I will be drafting the appropriate letters w/in the next couple of days. I also want to be clear that I loathe the fact that we have become a litigation-happy nation, the only reason I even considered legal procedures was for safety reasons. This guy could kill someone, seriously.
Again, thanks for all the input. n198ua It's a perfect sweeps story... and I'm not kidding either LV (who has worked in news longer then I care to admit) |
Originally Posted by cpx
(Post 8608452)
Ignoring a request/notice/information provided by OP and doing something
that could potentially be fatal shouldn't be taken lightly. Whether the OP had the ID or not, his request not to use a metal detector should not have been ignored. |
You should also request that the tape of the incident from the security cameras be saved so as to prove up your contention. You need to do that sooner rather than later. Otherwise it is very easy for the TSA to deny that the incident happened.
|
deleted
|
Originally Posted by mikeon
(Post 8609651)
I don't think I quite understand the entire story here. So tell me if this is correct.
Did at some time did you go through a side door into the secondary screening area and get a pat down or did they just let you walk away? |
What the TSO did was, technically, an assault -- you were placed in fear of an imminent, unpermitted offensive contact. Should you sue? No -- aside from a few moments of fear, you have no damages.
However, next time something like that happens, call for a LEO immediately. The moron TSO could have sent you to the hospital or even killed you. Assault is assault and, once told that you had a pacemaker, he had absolutely no business approaching you with the wand -- waving that wand at you was no different than waving a knife or pointing a loaded gun. If it was me, I'd have pressed charges. At minimum, that idiot should be fired. I think he should have been arrested. |
Had this happened in CVG or LEX, I would have pressed charges accordingly:
KRS 508.060 Wanton endangerment in the first degree. (1) A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person. (2) Wanton endangerment in the first degree is a Class D felony. Effective: January 1, 1975 History: Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 70, effective January 1, 1975. What would likely happen is that they would drop it to Wanton endangerment in the second degree, which is a Class A misdemeanor. But I bet you could make this one stick. |
Go for it. Find out what statutes cover both these cretins' actions, and see if you can sock it to them. Felony would be great, but a misdemeanor with enough press coverage would be almost as good.
Can you imagine the chastising effect such a case would have on the entire TSA clown show? I'm really tired of the public being pushed around the way reports on this forum prove. Get those tapes subpoenaed and under evidentiary rules NOW! |
Originally Posted by LV702
(Post 8609231)
You work in news...
It's a perfect sweeps story... and I'm not kidding either LV (who has worked in news longer then I care to admit) I agree completely. |
Originally Posted by PTravel
(Post 8609848)
What the TSO did was, technically, an assault -- you were placed in fear of an imminent, unpermitted offensive contact. Should you sue? No -- aside from a few moments of fear, you have no damages.
However, next time something like that happens, call for a LEO immediately. The moron TSO could have sent you to the hospital or even killed you. Assault is assault and, once told that you had a pacemaker, he had absolutely no business approaching you with the wand -- waving that wand at you was no different than waving a knife or pointing a loaded gun. If it was me, I'd have pressed charges. At minimum, that idiot should be fired. I think he should have been arrested. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:21 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.