![]() |
TSA recognized locking mechanism
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">TSA suggests that you help prevent the need to break your locks by using a TSA recognized locking mechanism. TSA is not liable for damage caused to locked bags that must be opened for security purposes.</font> |
I did a quick search and found this site
http://www.travelsentry.org/ I have not checked it out any futher. |
Here is a link to a thread that details how once again, the TSA does not have a clue.
http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...ML/000435.html |
Ignore CameraGuy, he just wants to stir the pot.
Travel Sentry is a TSA recognized locking mechanism. |
Please provide a link to the portion of the TSA web site that states this.
Also, please provide a link to the portion of the TSA web site that explains what the TSA will do when one if it's screeners cuts one of thse locks. |
|
Thanks for your answers. I'll try to find something similar here in our Finnish department stores.
|
As the OP noted, keep in mind that the TSA suggests that luggage be unlocked; it's not a requirement:
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">. . . if the bag is locked and TSA needs to open your bag then locks may have to be broken. You may keep your bag locked if you choose but TSA is not liable for damage caused to locked bags that must be opened for security purposes.</font> Passengers have the option of not locking their bags, using "approved" locks, or using other locks. Each option has its pros and cons. The TSA's packing tips are here. [This message has been edited by Y_me? (edited Jan 23, 2004).] |
Please provide a link to the portion of the TSA web site that states this.
Not everything is on the TSA web site. The information mentioned is from an aviation operations order which can not be posted in it's entirety due to Security Sensitive Information. |
I'll assume that is "Government Speak" for:
I have no proof. |
No that is "Government Speak" for:
"If I tell you then I have to kill you". |
Nope,
It means you have no proof. SSI is a HUGE cop-out. NOTHING known to over 50,000 people, some of them convicted felons is "secure". |
>>Nope,
It means you have no proof.<< So the papers sitting on my desk explaining the whole process aren't proof. OK I'll tell all the screeners to ignore it because the great CameraGuy says it doesn't exist. I am not going to post what is marked as SSI and get in trouble for the likes of CameraGuy. Plus what do I have to prove? The question was asked which locking mechanisms are TSA recognized and it was answered. CameraGuy just enjoys causing trouble. |
Oh, I get it.
Given the VAST credibility both the TSA as an organization and you personally have built in the past 2 years is enough for us to take you at your word. http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...m/rolleyes.gif I don't think so. |
>>Given the VAST credibility both the TSA as an organization and you personally have built in the past 2 years is enough for us to take you at your word.<<
Your comment on TSA is understandable but since you don't know me your comment about my credibility is unfounded. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:17 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.