![]() |
TSA recognized locking mechanism
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">TSA suggests that you help prevent the need to break your locks by using a TSA recognized locking mechanism. TSA is not liable for damage caused to locked bags that must be opened for security purposes.</font> |
I did a quick search and found this site
http://www.travelsentry.org/ I have not checked it out any futher. |
Here is a link to a thread that details how once again, the TSA does not have a clue.
http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...ML/000435.html |
Ignore CameraGuy, he just wants to stir the pot.
Travel Sentry is a TSA recognized locking mechanism. |
Please provide a link to the portion of the TSA web site that states this.
Also, please provide a link to the portion of the TSA web site that explains what the TSA will do when one if it's screeners cuts one of thse locks. |
|
Thanks for your answers. I'll try to find something similar here in our Finnish department stores.
|
As the OP noted, keep in mind that the TSA suggests that luggage be unlocked; it's not a requirement:
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">. . . if the bag is locked and TSA needs to open your bag then locks may have to be broken. You may keep your bag locked if you choose but TSA is not liable for damage caused to locked bags that must be opened for security purposes.</font> Passengers have the option of not locking their bags, using "approved" locks, or using other locks. Each option has its pros and cons. The TSA's packing tips are here. [This message has been edited by Y_me? (edited Jan 23, 2004).] |
Please provide a link to the portion of the TSA web site that states this.
Not everything is on the TSA web site. The information mentioned is from an aviation operations order which can not be posted in it's entirety due to Security Sensitive Information. |
I'll assume that is "Government Speak" for:
I have no proof. |
No that is "Government Speak" for:
"If I tell you then I have to kill you". |
Nope,
It means you have no proof. SSI is a HUGE cop-out. NOTHING known to over 50,000 people, some of them convicted felons is "secure". |
>>Nope,
It means you have no proof.<< So the papers sitting on my desk explaining the whole process aren't proof. OK I'll tell all the screeners to ignore it because the great CameraGuy says it doesn't exist. I am not going to post what is marked as SSI and get in trouble for the likes of CameraGuy. Plus what do I have to prove? The question was asked which locking mechanisms are TSA recognized and it was answered. CameraGuy just enjoys causing trouble. |
Oh, I get it.
Given the VAST credibility both the TSA as an organization and you personally have built in the past 2 years is enough for us to take you at your word. http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...m/rolleyes.gif I don't think so. |
>>Given the VAST credibility both the TSA as an organization and you personally have built in the past 2 years is enough for us to take you at your word.<<
Your comment on TSA is understandable but since you don't know me your comment about my credibility is unfounded. |
The TSA-approved locks are still new, and are now available in three distinct sizes. A very large four-number combo, a smaller three number combo, both for check-in luggage, and a smaller brass three-number combo for something the size of a carry-on.
My recent experience has been varied. One lock was cut off, most likely at LAX, as I stood by and watched the check at SFO - who did not have the keys, according to screeners (who were cooperative and helpful.) On re-checking after Customs in LAX, a guy supervising bag re-checks told me in a very loud tone of voice to "get those locks off those bags". When I informed him they were the TSA approved locks, he glared and heaved my bags to his colleagues. Must not have been his day? At SMF in December, a friend with TSA locks was delayed briefly - nobody had seen the locks, and though they had keys, the TSA on duty all needed to check it out. Ooh! Aah! 8-o When I can, I still fly with carry-ons only, with small combo locks, as above largely deterrents for would-be stealthy thieves in a hurry. Keep travelin' |
What good is using a lock on your luggage that uses keys in wide distribution? If someone wants to steal something, won't they simply break the flimsy little lock off? Will the luggage theives not also collect the list of key codes and a set of keys?
|
So what is the secret procedure I should follow if I put a TSA approved lock on my bags and it gets removed?
|
The FAQ now contains a reference to "recognized locking mechanism".
|
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by TransWorldOne: What good is using a lock on your luggage that uses keys in wide distribution? If someone wants to steal something, won't they simply break the flimsy little lock off? Will the luggage theives not also collect the list of key codes and a set of keys?</font> One major problem with the current system is that the airlines and TSA blame each other when your stuff is stolen, and neither takes responsiblity. If only TSA has the keys to the locks, it theoretically should make it easier to hold them accountable for the losses we all know are occuring. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:14 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.