Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Denied Boarding due to SSSS on Boarding Pass

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Denied Boarding due to SSSS on Boarding Pass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2011, 9:59 am
  #16  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Are the passports valid? Possession of a passport does not necessarily mean the passport hasn't been invalidated by the issuing authority.

Some telling details about the situation seem to be missing.

Since when do people flagged down by the no-fly list get to fly on a large commercially-scheduled carrier's flight(s) prior to TRIP being processed and accepted to produce a Redress number? Something doesn't add up here, especially with being flown back to Flint. Perhaps some agent or passenger confusion, maybe something related to UK APIS processing kicking back something. Not clear in the least what would explain this situation.

Last edited by TWA884; Oct 7, 2019 at 1:47 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011, 10:34 am
  #17  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Are the passports valid? Possession of a passport does not necessarily mean the passport hasn't been invalidated by the issuing authority.

Some telling details about the situation seem to be missing.

Since when do people flagged down by the no-fly list get to fly on a large commercially-scheduled carrier's flight(s) prior to TRIP being processed and accepted to produce a Redress number? Something doesn't add up here, especially with being flown back to Flint. Perhaps some agent or passenger confusion, maybe something related to UK APIS processing kicking back something. Not clear in the least what would explain this situation.
Sorry to be a pain in the rear but I don't understand . I haven't the knowledge of flying and don't understand this TRIP and Redress, having only looked at the website about it today.
Is everybody in agreeance that he should not have been allowed to board the flight from FNT to DTW?
This is everything he knows as of this point as personnel he has spoken to (at DTW and FNT) weren't all that helpful. Hoping to shed some more light on the situation asap.

Originally Posted by Emm1412
Sorry to be a pain in the rear but I don't understand . I haven't the knowledge of flying and don't understand this TRIP and Redress, having only looked at the website about it today.
Is everybody in agreeance that he should not have been allowed to board the flight from FNT to DTW?
This is everything he knows as of this point as personnel he has spoken to (at DTW and FNT) weren't all that helpful. Hoping to shed some more light on the situation asap.
I forgot to add that when he spoke to the lady at FNT, she said this is not a regular occurance, this is quite unusual and she can't understand why it's happened this way. Thanks

Last edited by TWA884; Oct 7, 2019 at 1:47 pm Reason: Merge consecutive posts by the same member; please use the multi-quote function. Thank you.
Emm1412 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011, 10:44 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
Originally Posted by Emm1412
Is everybody in agreeance that he should not have been allowed to board the flight from FNT to DTW?
If he was giving a boarding pass, he should have been allowed to board that flight, so no, people aren't in agreement with that!

I would suggest calling Delta and asking to speak to a supervisor. It's possible that some notations may have been made in his record.
RichardKenner is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011, 10:51 am
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by RichardKenner
If he was giving a boarding pass, he should have been allowed to board that flight, so no, people aren't in agreement with that!

I would suggest calling Delta and asking to speak to a supervisor. It's possible that some notations may have been made in his record.
Thank you Richard, will keep updated here with whatever I find out!
Emm1412 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011, 11:14 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Emma1412, a passenger being marked "SSSS" would never prevent them from flying. I do not think this incident has anything to do with TSA, despite what the airline told you.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011, 1:37 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
File a complaint with DoT for involuntary denied boarding.

SSSS will not prevent someone from traveling. It just means they have to have an intrusive search by the TSA.

If Delta denied boarding because of this, it was an involuntary denied boarding.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 7:52 am
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by SATTSO
Emma1412, a passenger being marked "SSSS" would never prevent them from flying. I do not think this incident has anything to do with TSA, despite what the airline told you.
Hi there, would 'SSSS' stop somebody entering a country? My friend has to call the airline again today as the manager wasn't available yesterday. He has her name and has to ask to speak to her today.
I'm wondering if it's worth him adjusting something in his name to avoid 'SSSS' or just rebook the flight and try again, possibly being flagged 'SSSS'. Which would you suggest? Thanks
Emm1412 is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 7:56 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: Flying Blue, easyJet Plus (!)
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by Emm1412
I'm wondering if it's worth him adjusting something in his name to avoid 'SSSS' or just rebook the flight and try again, possibly being flagged 'SSSS'. Which would you suggest? Thanks
No, because SSSS doesn't exist in most other countries. So far as I know in the UK, what level of search is done at the checkpoint is decided by the security staff and the current security level, not by something on a boarding pass which they don't even get to see.

Neil
pacer142 is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 7:56 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by Emm1412
Hi there, would 'SSSS' stop somebody entering a country? My friend has to call the airline again today as the manager wasn't available yesterday. He has her name and has to ask to speak to her today.
I'm wondering if it's worth him adjusting something in his name to avoid 'SSSS' or just rebook the flight and try again, possibly being flagged 'SSSS'. Which would you suggest? Thanks
I am sorry, but I am not able to advise you on what another country may do. But I do know in all the years I have worked for TSA, I have never seen a "SSSS" status prevent someone from flying, or traveling internationally.

Lots here will give you advice: most of it you should ignore. I could contact the destination country through their embassy, our Dept. of State, and the airline to see what really happened.

I do have a question regarding the "SSSS", though: your friend flew the first part of their trip, and then was denied the second part which would have gone international. Were both legs of the flight marked as "SSSS", or only one part?

What I mean by this question is if TSA has someone on the Watch list to be a "SSSS", they are that way on EVERY flight they take. If it is just on a flight here or there, and not always, they are NOT on the list.

Airlines can have problems, such as their computers being down that link them to the Watch List: when that happens, they revert to the older way of generating "SSSS".

If you friend flew one part of the trip without the "SSSS", they are not on the Watch List.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 8:27 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by SATTSO
I am sorry, but I am not able to advise you on what another country may do. But I do know in all the years I have worked for TSA, I have never seen a "SSSS" status prevent someone from flying, or traveling internationally.

Lots here will give you advice: most of it you should ignore. I could contact the destination country through their embassy, our Dept. of State, and the airline to see what really happened.

I do have a question regarding the "SSSS", though: your friend flew the first part of their trip, and then was denied the second part which would have gone international. Were both legs of the flight marked as "SSSS", or only one part?

What I mean by this question is if TSA has someone on the Watch list to be a "SSSS", they are that way on EVERY flight they take. If it is just on a flight here or there, and not always, they are NOT on the list.

Airlines can have problems, such as their computers being down that link them to the Watch List: when that happens, they revert to the older way of generating "SSSS".

If you friend flew one part of the trip without the "SSSS", they are not on the Watch List.
There are additional ways of getting the SSSS markings without being on a "list," but this entire story is implausible.

It makes no sense to get a SSSS marking on a connecting flight when one is already in the sterile area. Something is fishy with the OP's story. If there really is an issue then the OP's "friend" needs to work it out with the airline. We can't (and shouldn't try) to help.
cb1111 is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 8:45 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by cb1111
There are additional ways of getting the SSSS markings without being on a "list," but this entire story is implausible.

It makes no sense to get a SSSS marking on a connecting flight when one is already in the sterile area. Something is fishy with the OP's story. If there really is an issue then the OP's "friend" needs to work it out with the airline. We can't (and shouldn't try) to help.

You are correct, there are additional ways to get the SSSS. However, I was responding to the claim the airline made that the passenger may have been on the Watch List, and told them to file a redress. If they were on the Watch List, it would happen with every flight they took.

It is very possible, though, to get the SSSS mark on one part of the list and not the other.

I do not believe, however, that there is anything fishy with the OP's story. I simply believe they do not have all the information, which is why they should contact all the parties involved.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 8:57 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by Emm1412
Hi there, would 'SSSS' stop somebody entering a country? My friend has to call the airline again today as the manager wasn't available yesterday. He has her name and has to ask to speak to her today.
I'm wondering if it's worth him adjusting something in his name to avoid 'SSSS' or just rebook the flight and try again, possibly being flagged 'SSSS'. Which would you suggest? Thanks
SSSS printed on a BP would not stop or prevent anyone from entering a country.

The SSSS is specific to US air carriers and the TSA.

As long as your friend had a valid US passport and was at the departure gate 45 minutes prior to boarding, there is no reason your friend should have been denied boarding in Detroit.

Speak to the Delta supervisor at FNT - if that doesn't produce desired results, call Delta HQ in Atlanta and ask to speak to Richard Anderson's (CEO) office. That should get your friend connected to a higher level Delta representative.

Call 404-715-2600 for Delta Corporate headquarters.

Hope your friend gets it sorted. It really sounds like Delta dropped the ball somewhere.
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 9:09 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by cb1111
There are additional ways of getting the SSSS markings without being on a "list," but this entire story is implausible.

It makes no sense to get a SSSS marking on a connecting flight when one is already in the sterile area. Something is fishy with the OP's story. If there really is an issue then the OP's "friend" needs to work it out with the airline. We can't (and shouldn't try) to help.
It does sound like something is missing, but at the same time, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a misunderstanding somewhere, confusion from an oversold flight, or it could entirely be possible Delta just dropped the ball.

There are a lot of people out there that don't know their rights when it comes to dealing with airlines. I've first-hand seen carriers take advantage of this to avoid paying IDBC -- I've also seen carriers "delay" pax to avoid a DBC situation on oversold flights.

The OP's "friend" does need to work it out with Delta. Either re-schedule travel (at no additional cost) or a full refund.

Best of Luck!
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 9:16 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by SATTSO
Lots here will give you advice: most of it you should ignore. I could contact the destination country through their embassy, our Dept. of State, and the airline to see what really happened.
In this particular thread, I can't say I've seen any bad advice.

If the OP's friend had a valid ticket, valid passport, met all check-in times, and was at the gate prior to boarding, he shouldn't have been offloaded.

OP's friend needs to get answers from the airline, as short of missing information, that is where the ball was dropped.
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 10:51 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,967
Originally Posted by SATTSO
I am sorry, but I am not able to advise you on what another country may do. But I do know in all the years I have worked for TSA, I have never seen a "SSSS" status prevent someone from flying, or traveling internationally.

Lots here will give you advice: most of it you should ignore. I could contact the destination country through their embassy, our Dept. of State, and the airline to see what really happened.
I also agree that the OP doesn't have the full story, and both she and the friend seem to be inexperienced flyers and at least the OP is making a lot of assumptions based on lack of knowledge.

Last edited by essxjay; Aug 15, 2011 at 3:31 am Reason: argumentative
exbayern is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.