![]() |
Originally Posted by stifle
(Post 18869515)
Disagree. They would trot out that tired old chestnut about how "the reports and statements the TSA has received indicate some inconsistencies with how the incident has been described".
|
Indeed! :)
|
Admittedly, I did not even think about that scenario, truth be told I was looking at it as I perceive it, now reading your posts I guess I was giving TSA too much credit.
Dan |
Originally Posted by dan1431
(Post 18870701)
Admittedly, I did not even think about that scenario, truth be told I was looking at it as I perceive it, now reading your posts I guess I was giving TSA too much credit.
|
Originally Posted by Caradoc
(Post 18871798)
S'OK. A majority of our elected legislators do exactly the same thing, which is how the TSA ends up getting funded again every budget session.
Interestingly, I tend to see the TSA as a bureaucracy, like any other US Gov't group and the problems/issues I and other experiences have more do with the way the US gov't operates as a whole rather than any one single agenda. Dan |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:45 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.