![]() |
Originally Posted by Caradoc
(Post 16270452)
Trotting.
I'm not sure they can actually "run," from the video I saw and the general condition of the TSA screeners I used to encounter when I was still flying. |
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 16270455)
They didn't runs at the gates and they evacuated from the sterile areas. All passengers went downstairs at the baggage claims. They have to put the passengers in the shelter. I did not see this incident. Why the escalator is different way and not wrong side of the terminals.
http://www.kmov.com/video/featured-v...120544144.html |
Originally Posted by Mabuk dan gila
(Post 16270648)
This is a little longer version of the video that features the TSA guys running for cover to the restrooms. In the background you can clearly see many dozens of PAX taking a direct hit while running for cover from what looks like the gate area at the moment the tornado hits. Clearly the sterile areas were not at all evacuated even slightly.
http://www.kmov.com/video/featured-v...120544144.html I arrived into MSP once when a menacing storm was approaching, but I was able to hear the tornado sirens inside the Boeing 757-300 I was on as we were landing. We did a quick taxi and deplaned. Inside the airport terminal, you could also hear the tornado sirens from outside. Announcements were made via the overhead PA to take shelter and to stay away from glass. While very few people did take shelter, many at least moved away from the big glass windows. I waited out the warning in the F/G club where staff also kept us away from windows. There were a # of diversions, but airport ops resumed once the storm cleared. At least, in MSP, there was awareness of the Tornado Warning. |
I didn't see any panic. I saw people either waiting right up to the last minute before evacuating or, as SDF_Traveler put it, perhaps unaware of the imminent event. And I saw TSOs return to the checkpoint after it had been hit. Pretty foolhardy, if you ask me, because at that point, no one can verify the integrity of the structure.
|
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 16269281)
There are a couple of website videos from the security cameras showing TSA screeners running for their lives.
|
`
Originally Posted by t325
(Post 16270196)
I guess the TSA forgot to pat down mother nature :D
SissyrishOverall Panic. |
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 16270225)
Nope. They didn't have a pat down procedures. :)
I guess the tornado wanted to opt-out :p |
Pretty cheap shot to criticize anyone running for safety from debris flying through a building.
|
The NWS confirmed that it was an EF-4 that hit the airport. (EF-4 = 166-200 mph). It's been probably 20 years since I have flown out of STL, so I'm not sure how the terminal is laid out. But, I will say that I have never seen screeners move that fast.
The Enhanced Fujita rating scale for tornadoes. FYI, my meteorologist friends tell me that the term they use for an EF-4 or EF-5 is "Pavement Puller." Bio on Ted Fujita -- one of the true icons of severe storm meteorology. |
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
(Post 16273384)
The NWS confirmed that it was an EF-4 that hit the airport. (EF-4 = 166-200 mph). It's been probably 20 years since I have flown out of STL, so I'm not sure how the terminal is laid out. But, I will say that I have never seen screeners move that fast.
The Enhanced Fujita rating scale for tornadoes. FYI, my meteorologist friends tell me that the term they use for an EF-4 or EF-5 is "Pavement Puller." Bio on Ted Fujita -- one of the true icons of severe storm meteorology. |
Originally Posted by Flaflyer
(Post 16267829)
". . . while the TSOs performing checked bag screenings brilliantly weighted themselved down to prevent being blown away, by filling their pockets with heavy objects from nearby unlocked bags. . ." :rolleyes:
Originally Posted by Bart
(Post 16271998)
I didn't see any panic. I saw people either waiting right up to the last minute before evacuating or, as SDF_Traveler put it, perhaps unaware of the imminent event. And I saw TSOs return to the checkpoint after it had been hit. Pretty foolhardy, if you ask me, because at that point, no one can verify the integrity of the structure.
Originally Posted by TSO1973
(Post 16273201)
Pretty cheap shot to criticize anyone running for safety from debris flying through a building.
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
(Post 16273384)
But, I will say that I have never seen screeners move that fast.
|
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
(Post 16272202)
:D
I guess the tornado wanted to opt-out :p |
Originally Posted by TSO1973
(Post 16273410)
They must have raised the estimate on it. On the way to work this morning, the news was reporting is as an EF-4 when it first touched down but was down to an EF-2 by the time it got to the airport. Scary stuff either way. I've experienced an EF-1 and that was enough for me.
|
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
(Post 16273493)
"down to an EF-2" = 111-135 mph. Mrs Flies and I took a direct hit from an EF-0 (65-85 mph) last Saturday night (April 16). It uprooted a tree which crashed into the garage and ripped off some shingles. ...got my attention!
The EF-1 hopscotched through the town we were living in, it passed overhead our condo and then touched down again less than 1/4 mile away. Wife and I were huddled in the bathroom on the bottom floor during the whole thing. |
Originally Posted by TSO1973
(Post 16273201)
Pretty cheap shot to criticize anyone running for safety from debris flying through a building.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:10 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.