|
Originally Posted by Mimi111
(Post 15888171)
This is true.
Why would you assume this is the case? The same people who are currently employed would simply be unionized. Wages and other forms of compensation is are off the table anyway. Given all the restrictions on what is allowed to be part of collective bargaining in this case, I really don't see what the benefit is for them unionizing. Details can be found here: http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/...argaining.shtm Empirical evidence. We get better employees because we offer better benefits. Our contracted employees are far lower quality, because they don't get the same benefits. If you build it, they will come... It's a valid philosophy. People flock to where the money is. Pay crap wages, get crap people. That's the way the world works. SR |
Originally Posted by srilm
(Post 15893238)
Empirical evidence. We get better employees because we offer better benefits. Our contracted employees are far lower quality, because they don't get the same benefits.
If you build it, they will come... It's a valid philosophy. People flock to where the money is. Pay crap wages, get crap people. That's the way the world works. SR |
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110420/...Jwb3J0c2NyZWU-
Airport screeners need runoff vote to choose union The Federal Labor Relations Authority says it will hold a runoff election to decide a winner between the top vote getters. The American Federation of Government Employees received 8,369 votes, or 43 percent, while the National Treasury Employees Union won 8,095 votes, or 41 percent. The choice of no union received 3,111 votes, or 16 percent. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:33 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.