TSA makes ‘nominal’ payment to settle suit over exposing 24-year-old’s breasts
#1
Original Poster


Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Riverside County, CA
Posts: 277
TSA makes ‘nominal’ payment to settle suit over exposing 24-year-old’s breasts
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/t...exposure-suit/
Another article I found:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documen...-exposure-suit
A woman who had her breasts exposed during an airport search by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was to receive a "nominal" payment as a part of the settlement.
The 24-year-old woman was selected for "extended search procedures" prior to boarding a plane to Amarillo, Texas in 2008.
A lawsuit claimed that the TSA agent pulled her blouse completely down while frisking her.
Raw Story decided against republishing the woman's name and photograph due to the nature of her ordeal.
"As would be expected, plaintiff was extremely embarrassed and humiliated," the lawsuit alleged.
"For an extended period of time" other agents made jokes about the incident. "One male TSA employee expressed to the plaintiff that he wished he would have been there when she came through the first time and that 'he would just have to watch the video.'"
Documents filed in US District Court last week revealed that the case had been settled.
Jerry McLaughlin, the victim's lawyer, described the payout as "nominal."
When asked if she received more than $100,000, McLaughlin laughed and said it "way less than that. It wasn’t a whole lot of money."
He added that his client would never have sued if the TSA had simply sent a letter apologizing.
She "was never interested in the money," McLaughlin said.
The 24-year-old woman was selected for "extended search procedures" prior to boarding a plane to Amarillo, Texas in 2008.
A lawsuit claimed that the TSA agent pulled her blouse completely down while frisking her.
Raw Story decided against republishing the woman's name and photograph due to the nature of her ordeal.
"As would be expected, plaintiff was extremely embarrassed and humiliated," the lawsuit alleged.
"For an extended period of time" other agents made jokes about the incident. "One male TSA employee expressed to the plaintiff that he wished he would have been there when she came through the first time and that 'he would just have to watch the video.'"
Documents filed in US District Court last week revealed that the case had been settled.
Jerry McLaughlin, the victim's lawyer, described the payout as "nominal."
When asked if she received more than $100,000, McLaughlin laughed and said it "way less than that. It wasn’t a whole lot of money."
He added that his client would never have sued if the TSA had simply sent a letter apologizing.
She "was never interested in the money," McLaughlin said.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documen...-exposure-suit
JANUARY 13--The woman who sued the Transportation Security Administration after her breasts were exposed during a frisking at a Texas airport will receive a “nominal” payment from the government as part of a legal settlement, The Smoking Gun has learned.
The settlement was disclosed in documents filed last week in U.S. District Court in Amarillo, where Lynsie Murley last year filed a lawsuit accusing the TSA of negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress in connection with the May 2008 incident at the Corpus Christi airport.
Murley’s lawyer, Jerry McLaughlin, declined to disclose the exact amount of money that his client is receiving, but termed the payout a “nominal settlement.” Asked if the amount hit six figures, McLaughlin laughed loudly and said the negotiated payment was “way less than that. It wasn’t a whole lot of money.” Murley, he said, “was never interested in the money,” and would not have filed a lawsuit if TSA officials had simply sent her a letter of apology.
Murley is pictured above in a photo from her Facebook page.
The 24-year-old Murley alleged that after being “singled out for extended search procedures,” a TSA agent frisked her and “pulled Plaintiff’s blouse completely down, exposing Plaintiff’s breasts to everyone in the area.” Her complaint noted that, “as would be expected,” Murley was “extremely embarrassed and humiliated.”
Murley charged that TSA employees “joked and laughed about the incident for an extended period of time.” After leaving the security line to be “consoled by an acquaintance who had brought her to the airport,” Murley returned to the line, where a male TSA worker said that he had wished he was there when she first passed through. The employee, Murley recalled, added that “he would just have to watch the video.”
The court settlement was reached shortly after government lawyers deposed Murley. The agreement, McLaughlin said, “got her some justice.” (5 pages)
The settlement was disclosed in documents filed last week in U.S. District Court in Amarillo, where Lynsie Murley last year filed a lawsuit accusing the TSA of negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress in connection with the May 2008 incident at the Corpus Christi airport.
Murley’s lawyer, Jerry McLaughlin, declined to disclose the exact amount of money that his client is receiving, but termed the payout a “nominal settlement.” Asked if the amount hit six figures, McLaughlin laughed loudly and said the negotiated payment was “way less than that. It wasn’t a whole lot of money.” Murley, he said, “was never interested in the money,” and would not have filed a lawsuit if TSA officials had simply sent her a letter of apology.
Murley is pictured above in a photo from her Facebook page.
The 24-year-old Murley alleged that after being “singled out for extended search procedures,” a TSA agent frisked her and “pulled Plaintiff’s blouse completely down, exposing Plaintiff’s breasts to everyone in the area.” Her complaint noted that, “as would be expected,” Murley was “extremely embarrassed and humiliated.”
Murley charged that TSA employees “joked and laughed about the incident for an extended period of time.” After leaving the security line to be “consoled by an acquaintance who had brought her to the airport,” Murley returned to the line, where a male TSA worker said that he had wished he was there when she first passed through. The employee, Murley recalled, added that “he would just have to watch the video.”
The court settlement was reached shortly after government lawyers deposed Murley. The agreement, McLaughlin said, “got her some justice.” (5 pages)
Last edited by Deinonychus; Jan 13, 2011 at 12:40 pm Reason: Found another article about the same thing
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,651
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
No, she can't. They would argue that they were performing their duties, and the Federal Government would protect them on that basis.
Bruce
Bruce
#8
In Memoriam
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
It was professionalism at it's finest that day
(while her picture and name appears in the stories she's done interviews for, I deleted her name in the cut and paste below, she shouldn't search for herself and end up here)
A TSA agent is alleged to have frisked Ms ****** and 'pulled Plaintiff's blouse completely down, exposing Plaintiff's breasts to everyone in the area'.
The TSA are accused to have 'joked and laughed about the incident for an extended period of time'.
After Ms ****** left the security line to be 'consoled by an acquintance who had brought her to the airport', she returned to the line only to be told by a male TSA woprker that he wished he had been there when she passed through the first time.
According to Ms ******, the officer added that 'he would just have to watch the video'.
Ms ****** was awarded her settlement soon after she gave her deposition to government lawyers.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1AxJwCKcG
It never got to court, which is apparently too bad.
(while her picture and name appears in the stories she's done interviews for, I deleted her name in the cut and paste below, she shouldn't search for herself and end up here)
A TSA agent is alleged to have frisked Ms ****** and 'pulled Plaintiff's blouse completely down, exposing Plaintiff's breasts to everyone in the area'.
The TSA are accused to have 'joked and laughed about the incident for an extended period of time'.
After Ms ****** left the security line to be 'consoled by an acquintance who had brought her to the airport', she returned to the line only to be told by a male TSA woprker that he wished he had been there when she passed through the first time.
According to Ms ******, the officer added that 'he would just have to watch the video'.
Ms ****** was awarded her settlement soon after she gave her deposition to government lawyers.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1AxJwCKcG
It never got to court, which is apparently too bad.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southwest Florida
Programs: AA lifetime Gold , DL Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 572
Hopefully as a result of the lawsuit, the TSA fired the TSO who pulled her blouse down and the TSO who made the sexist remark.
This does prove that the TSA can be sued in court in certain instances, maybe this will change attitudes of some of the TSO’s who feel they can not be held libel for their actions.
But in reality, wishful thinking.
Mr. Elliott
This does prove that the TSA can be sued in court in certain instances, maybe this will change attitudes of some of the TSO’s who feel they can not be held libel for their actions.
But in reality, wishful thinking.
Mr. Elliott
#10
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 453
Hopefully as a result of the lawsuit, the TSA fired the TSO who pulled her blouse down and the TSO who made the sexist remark.
This does prove that the TSA can be sued in court in certain instances, maybe this will change attitudes of some of the TSO’s who feel they can not be held libel for their actions.
But in reality, wishful thinking.
Mr. Elliott
This does prove that the TSA can be sued in court in certain instances, maybe this will change attitudes of some of the TSO’s who feel they can not be held libel for their actions.
But in reality, wishful thinking.
Mr. Elliott
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
The whole story just makes me sick.
Bruce
#13
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
We have had unintentional events like that before. The two that I recall are both the results of loose clothes and the gloves that we wear. The gloves are "takcy" on one side and tend to grip clothing. The difference is that the officers that were in these events did not make remarks about it.
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
We have had unintentional events like that before. The two that I recall are both the results of loose clothes and the gloves that we wear. The gloves are "takcy" on one side and tend to grip clothing. The difference is that the officers that were in these events did not make remarks about it.




