![]() |
How many of us are in the databases?
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/t.../?hpid=topnews
This entire article makes my blood boil. I wonder how many of us are in this database because we took a stand for our Constitutional rights while flying. Our only crime being that we didn't want to get irradiated or groped. Suspicious Activity Report N03821 says a local law enforcement officer observed "a suspicious subject . . . taking photographs of the Orange County Sheriff Department Fire Boat and the Balboa Ferry with a cellular phone camera." ... He was then met by another person, both of whom stood and "observed the boat traffic in the harbor." Next another adult with two small children joined them, and then they all boarded the ferry and crossed the channel. All of this information was forwarded to the Los Angeles fusion center for further investigation after the local officer ran information about the vehicle and its owner through several crime databases and found nothing. As of December, there were 161,948 suspicious activity files in the classified Guardian database. Of those, 103 have become full investigations that have resulted in at least five arrests, the FBI said. There have been no convictions yet. |
She [Napolitano] recently enlisted the help of Wal-Mart, Amtrak, major sports leagues, hotel chains and metro riders. In her speeches, she compares the undertaking to the Cold War fight against communists. ~~ Irish |
Originally Posted by bnJ987
(Post 15487074)
I wonder how many of us are in this database because we took a stand for our Constitutional rights while flying.
|
To put a little perspective here, it's very likely that the reporter for the article had access to numerous such reports and the one that was chosen here was "the worst". So trying to generalize all the reports as being similar to the one that was reported is undoubtably wrong.
|
DHS wrote this little gem:
http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf (U) Disgruntled Military Veterans (U//FOUO) DHS/I&A assesses that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat. These skills and knowledge have the potential to boost the capabilities of extremists—including lone wolves or small terrorist cells—to carry out violence. The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today. |
Originally Posted by IrishDoesntFlyNow
(Post 15487105)
Shades of Joe McCarthy.
~~ Irish |
Suspicious Activity Report N03821 says a local law enforcement officer observed "a suspicious subject . . . taking photographs of the Orange County Sheriff Department Fire Boat and the Balboa Ferry with a cellular phone camera." ... He was then met by another person, both of whom stood and "observed the boat traffic in the harbor." Next another adult with two small children joined them, and then they all boarded the ferry and crossed the channel. Or does it just not matter because I'm Caucasian? Pardon my French, but WTH? :confused: :confused: :confused: |
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1
Govt 'creating vast domestic snooping machine' Dec 20 07:27 AM US/Eastern The government is creating a vast domestic spying network to collect information about Americans in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks and subsequent terror plots, The Washington Post reported Monday. |
This appears to be a continuation of The Washington Post's TSA (Top Secret America) stories. There's an opportunity to correlate the world of top-secret portions of America, and the sterile area managed by the TSA. In that bubble, the normal rules don't apply. :)
|
Originally Posted by RichardKenner
(Post 15487167)
To put a little perspective here, it's very likely that the reporter for the article had access to numerous such reports and the one that was chosen here was "the worst". So trying to generalize all the reports as being similar to the one that was reported is undoubtably wrong.
YMMV of course. |
Richard Nixon would be proud.
|
I know that I am in a database or two. After my shirt incident at MCI, I discovered that a formal report was written up.. Good thing they did notnget my name when I was there!
|
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
(Post 15487749)
To add even more perspective, 5 arrests from 161,000 reports might indicate this is a collosal waste of effort. Not to mention an egregious assault on liberty. :mad:
YMMV of course. |
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 15488213)
Richard Nixon would be proud.
Tell me again who "won" that there Cold War? I am having trouble telling the sides apart. Was it Eastasia or was it . . . |
Originally Posted by Michilander
(Post 15488927)
Even worse, 5 arrests and NO convictions. This is a VERY distrubing report. I can hear Huxley now, "Looks like I was off by 26 years."
I don't remember if Huxley specified the year of the Brave New World, but the Orwellian nightmare of 1984 is definitely invading reality. |
I think our right to privacy ought to include the right to not be in any database. The USA got along well for many years without computers and databases.
|
Originally Posted by mozgytog
(Post 15489428)
Do you mean Orwell?
I don't remember if Huxley specified the year of the Brave New World, but the Orwellian nightmare of 1984 is definitely invading reality. |
Originally Posted by Michilander
(Post 15488927)
Even worse, 5 arrests and NO convictions.
|
Gee, and we wonder why we have budget problems in this country. As the Washington Post series has pointed out, a lot of this stuff is in black budgets not subject to public oversight. And, as we can see from this debacle, every politician in both partied considers this a sacred cow and doesn't want to be seen as "soft on terrorism."
The result? A gigantic, expensive, untouchable security bureaucracy reaching into the lives of everyday Americans who are seeing their taxes go up and standard of living go down. |
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 15488213)
Richard Nixon would be proud.
|
How many of us are in the databases?
I am proud to say that I am in the "databases" and have been about as long as I've been on FlyerTalk. |
Originally Posted by Wollstonecraft
(Post 15490325)
A gigantic, expensive, untouchable security bureaucracy reaching into the lives of everyday Americans who are seeing their taxes go up and standard of living go down.
|
Originally Posted by eturowski
(Post 15487603)
So let me get this straight... If I spend an afternoon at Boston Harbor, decide I'd like to take pictures of some boats, meet a friend, watch more boats for a little bit, and then my other friend and her kids join us, and then we all get on a harbor cruise to visit Spectacle Island... somehow that counts as "suspicious"?
Or does it just not matter because I'm Caucasian? Pardon my French, but WTH? :confused: :confused: :confused:
Originally Posted by RoyalFlush
(Post 14198837)
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums/...6-20100749.jpg
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums/...6-20100751.jpg Hi everyone, this pamphlet was down at my local boatyard. My personal favorites include Be aware of suspicious activity including people taking photos and transfer of people between ship and shore :eek: I wanted to share this with the FT TS&S community. Peace - |
Washington Post-DHS, Top Secret America
There are some very sobering statistics with regards to DHS's spending habits. They are spying on us at every turn, so the next time you go into Walmart or your local corner store you may want to cover your license plate over. (I kid you not) They actually have local gov'ts taking pictures of people's plates while they are shopping.
DHS is so busy with their Big Brother spying that they said they don't even know how much they are spending on it. What? This article is a long, eye opening read, so make some popcorn, put your feet up and get ready for some crazy reading. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/t...ing-america/1/ |
DHS doesn't seem to be committed to the idea that Americans' privacy rights should extend beyond the house (if even that). DHS however does seem to be committed to creating a Big Brother infrastructure/society that covers everything that may be potentially viewable by another ordinary citizen -- in other words, DHS wants that everything that may be in public view should be allowed for DHS tracking.
|
the only "suspicion" needed to get you added to the database is taking pictures, or (presumably) being stopped by a BDO/having your information taken at an enhanc -er- resolution patdown.
|
Originally Posted by greentips
(Post 15490915)
Old news, my friend. Remember. Everybody is suspicious to everyone else. Big Brother is watching.
My favorite part there is to "Watch for vessels" near ports, bridges and marinas. I'll get right on that. |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 15490609)
I'm sure Richard Nixon wasn't as bad as the worst of Team DHS, regardless of branch of government.
|
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
(Post 15488877)
I know that I am in a database or two. After my shirt incident at MCI, I discovered that a formal report was written up.. Good thing they did notnget my name when I was there!
(not trying to bring you into a poor light, I just want to see how crap like this gets written up, and how much sunlight would be needed to disinfect it) |
I'm sure that all the Anto-NoS activists here on FT are in the databases. Of course, we want the NoS' to be discontinued because they are extremely effective and foiling our terror plot :P *sarcasm*
|
Originally Posted by svenskaflicka
(Post 15491104)
DHS is so busy with their Big Brother spying that they said they don't even know how much they are spending on it.
|
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 15491466)
Just imagine what Nixon could have done - and what the politicians of the future can do - with the dossiers that DHS is compiling on the American populace. Don't think it won't happen. Just see what J. Edgar Hoover did (COINTELPRO), Joseph McCarthy did, or Nixon's enemies list.
|
That brochure posted above is unbelievable. In fact, if I didn't know what was going on in our country right now I would think it was a joke. Here is what I don't understand: many of the items listed on there as suspicious are perfectly normal behaviors that one can and does see all the time:
1. Unusual diving activity: How does your typical boater determine what is "unusual" diving activity? This summer my friends and I drove up to Lake Meredith and rented a small boat for 2 hours (suspicious???). We paid in cash (suspicious???), and drove out a few miles, dropped the anchor, and I jumped off the boat to take a dip. Is this now considered suspicious? I know swimming and diving are not the same thing but my point is, who determines what is suspicious? That is a completely subjective assessment. This is what law enforcement are trained to look for, not everyday citizens! 2. Unsual number of people onboard: Again, this is really specific. :rolleyes: Who decides what an "unusual" number of passengers is on any given vessel at any given time? :confused: 3. My favorite: Note taking, video, sketches, asking questions. These are things ANY tourist is going to do! In fact, many tourists will do ALL of those things. I love to ask questions when I am in new places. How about artists, and videographers, and vacationers that participate in these hobbies?? This is now suspicious activity? It would be one thing if specially trained LEOs were being tasked with this kind of vigilance because they would hopefully be able to discren between normal tourist behavior and something fishy. But when you start making requests like this of Joe Q. Public you are asking for HUGE problems. American citizens should not be spying on each other. This is NOT appropriate behavior on the part of our government to ask this! |
Originally Posted by TXagogo
(Post 15492008)
That brochure posted above is unbelievable. In fact, if I didn't know what was going on in our country right now I would think it was a joke. Here is what I don't understand: many of the items listed on there as suspicious are perfectly normal behaviors that one can and does see all the time:
1. Unusual diving activity: How does your typical boater determine what is "unusual" diving activity? This summer my friends and I drove up to Lake Meredith and rented a small boat for 2 hours (suspicious???). We paid in cash (suspicious???), and drove out a few miles, dropped the anchor, and I jumped off the boat to take a dip. Is this now considered suspicious? I know swimming and diving are not the same thing but my point is, who determines what is suspicious? That is a completely subjective assessment. This is what law enforcement are trained to look for, not everyday citizens! 2. Unsual number of people onboard: Again, this is really specific. :rolleyes: Who decides what an "unusual" number of passengers is on any given vessel at any given time? :confused: 3. My favorite: Note taking, video, sketches, asking questions. These are things ANY tourist is going to do! In fact, many tourists will do ALL of those things. I love to ask questions when I am in new places. How about artists, and videographers, and vacationers that participate in these hobbies?? This is now suspicious activity? It would be one thing if specially trained LEOs were being tasked with this kind of vigilance because they would hopefully be able to discren between normal tourist behavior and something fishy. But when you start making requests like this of Joe Q. Public you are asking for HUGE problems. American citizens should not be spying on each other. This is NOT appropriate behavior on the part of our government to ask this! |
Originally Posted by TXagogo
(Post 15492008)
American citizens should not be spying on each other. This is NOT appropriate behavior on the part of our government to ask this!
|
Originally Posted by VegasCableGuy
(Post 15491460)
My favorite part there is to "Watch for vessels" near ports, bridges and marinas.
I'll get right on that. |
Originally Posted by Caradoc
(Post 15492722)
Rumor has it that if you turn in five of your neighbors at the Wal-Mart DHS kiosk, you get a coupon for a free brown shirt.
|
TXagogo - if you think thats bad being a diver alone you try being a underwater photographer, that has caused more BS and incidents were i wanted to shove a fin up some idiots butt sideways then i can count. Then if you want to throw in a rebreather, stage and/or deco tanks and a scooter in the mix it gets even worse.
As sad as it is the BS from diving has paled in comparision to what i have dealt with as a photographer. Talk about a lot of nervous nellies scared of there shadow, but yet like to stick there mug in other peoples business. I have no doubt im in multiple government databases but getting all up in my business or showing up at my residence unannouced (this being Texas after all) could be hazardous to ones health. |
Next time I take a cruise, you can better believe I'll think twice before transferring myself or my stuff between the shore and the ship.
|
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
(Post 15493226)
I have no doubt im in multiple government databases but getting all up in my business or showing up at my residence unannouced (this being Texas after all) could be hazardous to ones health.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:57 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.