Eight month delay explained by Pistole
Nov 23, 2010 | 9:46 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Dirt Status w/ All
Posts: 5,049
Nov 23, 2010 | 9:54 pm
#3
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: A Capital City on The East Coast
Programs: CO-Dirt,SPG-Nothing,Marriott-Gold, Hilton-Blue, Hyatt-Plat, HI-Plat
Posts: 6,872
From article
""If we receive any complaints from a passenger about something happening, then we immediately follow up both with that passenger and with our security officers," he(Pissy) said.
Sounds like there's going to be lots of OT just in time for Christmas shopping
""If we receive any complaints from a passenger about something happening, then we immediately follow up both with that passenger and with our security officers," he(Pissy) said.
Sounds like there's going to be lots of OT just in time for Christmas shopping
Nov 24, 2010 | 8:42 am
#4
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 5,017
Given how involved Nappy was in the interim the lack of director should not have been an issue. She could have issued the directive. Especially, if there was truly a threat. Further, the lack of a director should never be an issue when it comes to security.
Nov 24, 2010 | 8:57 am
#5
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
Or... this isn't going to go over well, let the next TSA head take the heat for making the decision. Wonder if the interim head was asked to decide, and deferred, knowing the mess it would create.
Nov 24, 2010 | 9:33 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,811
There is no empirical evidence for this. Most complainers see no effects. If TSOs were worried about pax complaints, they'd be less bold about inventing insane rules, harassing passengers, procuring cute girls for the Nude-o-Scopes, and stealing our stuff.