Quote:
You are assuming the FAs and PAX would not fight back.Originally Posted by Firebug4
How are the pilots going to react if the bad guys start killing the flight attendants one by one then move on to the passengers if they don't open the door?
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Quote:
Impossible. The pilots would paste any hijackers to the ceiling and land so quickly your head would spin -- literally.Originally Posted by Firebug4
I don't know that I would go that far. The Sept. 11 hijackings were done with box cutters. Yes, the doors are re-enforced now I understand that but how about the individual pilots psychological resolve? How are the pilots going to react if the bad guys start killing the flight attendants one by one then move on to the passengers if they don't open the door? Yes, I am sure they intellectually know that if they open the door likely they are all dead but I am sure it is a different story if you had to sit there and listen to the screams.
Bruce
Quote:
Don't complain - shortly after 9/11, i took a red-eye from LAX to JFK. I had to show ID before security, at the other end of the WTMD, at the entrance to the jet bridge, and at the aircraft door. I finally had to ask the FA if someone thought I had transmogrified as I walked through the jetway...Originally Posted by Crazyhotelguy
Same at STL a few weeks back... Was asked twice for id an bp within a 5 minute span at the gate..... It is all theater...
Quote:
I think if you show up at anyone's place of work and get snotty with them, you should expect them to get snotty back. Sounds like you two deserved each other that day! Originally Posted by sbm12
I was also VERY late to the airport and to the gate and was not happy with the guy and probably let it show. He actually followed me down the jetway to yell at me about how he was just doing his job, blah, blah, blah. Pretty ridiculous.

Quote:
... I don't see that happening because the majority of the country that these people represent doesnt care. They don't care because they fly maybe once a year at best and just doesnt affect them.
There are surely more "once a year" flyers than "frequent flyers" such as the people here. If politicians are looking for votes, they have to pander to the "once a year" flyers (and the non-flyers, who are also a large part of the population).Originally Posted by Firebug4
Is it a likely scenario? No, I don't think so but it doesnt matter what I think or what you think. It only matters what the collective public thinks. It all boils down to what the public is willing to endure. Right now the vast majority of the population is willing to endure a lot to feel safe. Notice I said feel safe not necessarily be safe. The posters on this board have to realize that they are not the vast majority of the traveling public. The vast majority of the traveling public, the ones you refer to as the "ma and pa kettle" travelers, ... I don't see that happening because the majority of the country that these people represent doesnt care. They don't care because they fly maybe once a year at best and just doesnt affect them.
But the airlines, airports and associated businesses need to heed the frequent flyers - while few in number, FFs represent the majority of revenue for the airlines. When the once-a-week and once-a-month flyers stop travelling, the airlines are going to fail. And politicians need to be aware of that, too.
Quote:
Any front line employee that deals with the flying public that way in the private sector would not have a job very long.Originally Posted by secretbunnyboy
I think if you show up at anyone's place of work and get snotty with them, you should expect them to get snotty back.
Quote:
I didn't get snotty. I held up my DL and allowed him to look at it. He then insisted that I take it out - again - so that he could give it an in-depth inspection. He had no means to do this in-depth inspection of course. No loupe. No blacklight. He just wanted to stare at it more. I was still trying to get my shoes back on and get my laptop into my bag. I literally ran from the checkpoint to the door so as to avoid missing the flight. I was sufficiently distracted and otherwise occupied that he did not receive my full attention nor did he deserve it.Originally Posted by secretbunnyboy
I think if you show up at anyone's place of work and get snotty with them, you should expect them to get snotty back. Sounds like you two deserved each other that day!
When he chose to follow me onto the jetway afterward to berate me he crossed the line. That's what I have a problem with.
Quote:
When he chose to follow me onto the jetway afterward to berate me he crossed the line. That's what I have a problem with.
And that's when it's Joe Pesci time.Originally Posted by sbm12
When he chose to follow me onto the jetway afterward to berate me he crossed the line. That's what I have a problem with.
Quote:
Bruce
I think that's one of the things people don't quite grasp. Airline pilots do their best to make flights smoooooooooth....Originally Posted by bdschobel
Impossible. The pilots would paste any hijackers to the ceiling and land so quickly your head would spin -- literally.Bruce
If necessary, they could make those planes rock and roll. Bad Guys roaming around the cabin would get tossed around pretty good.
Quote:
Knives were a secondary factor in 9/11, maybe even a tertiary factor. The real (genious) terrorism behind 9/11 was exploiting airline policy of unconditional cooperation with hijackers. Knives made it easy for them to quickly get compliance from crews and passengers, but they could have achieved the same effect with broken glass, strangling people with shoelaces or neckties, or just claiming to have a bomb.Originally Posted by Firebug4
I don't know that I would go that far. The Sept. 11 hijackings were done with box cutters. Yes, the doors are re-enforced now I understand that but how about the individual pilots psychological resolve? How are the pilots going to react if the bad guys start killing the flight attendants one by one then move on to the passengers if they don't open the door?
I'm willing to accept a ban on boxcutters as long as we recognize it is a feel good measure in reaction to 9/11 and has no real security benefit. And large knives (say, blade of 4" or greater) have no more business on an aircraft than swords, guns, explosives, or incendiaries. But banning little 1.5" pen knives is silly, particularly since they easily make it through the metal detector without alarm.
Quote:
You know that there are metal knives and forks onboard the plane for C and F dinner service, right?Originally Posted by codex57
I agree. First thing I think about when I hear "knives" is 9/11. Lots of stuff is theater and ineffective. Doesn't mean we should allow knives and weapons and explosives on board. I'd really rather not make it easy for any bad guys to create a hostage situation.
Does anyone else still burst out laughing every time they pull out that little magnifying glass and examine your ID like it's a rare stamp?
Mike
Mike
Quote:
They ought to do the same for the boarding pass, as the "thorough" ID check is worthless without an equally thorough check of the boarding pass. Oh... wait... BPs are not "secure" by any definition of the word. If the TSA really gave a rat's rear end about matching IDs to boarding passes, they would not let airlines issue home-printed (OLCI) boarding passes without verifiable one-time-use bar codes.Originally Posted by mikeef
Does anyone else still burst out laughing every time they pull out that little magnifying glass and examine your ID like it's a rare stamp?
This is just another example of how TSA management is either concerned with theater/production values, or is far less qualified than I. Note that I do not claim that I could competently run the TSA.
I've been tempted to use fluorescent ink to mark my ID with some amusing/odd message (or to "spill" a few drops), but the little good judgement that I have has always gotten in the way of my plans.
Quote:
That's a very good point. I agree with what you have to say because, since I travel as part of my job, quite often the airport is my place of work. Therefore; when TSA employees show up there and get snotty with me they should expect me to get snotty back.Originally Posted by secretbunnyboy
I think if you show up at anyone's place of work and get snotty with them, you should expect them to get snotty back. . . . .
Quote:
I quite agree.Originally Posted by T-the-B
That's a very good point. I agree with what you have to say because, since I travel as part of my job, quite often the airport is my place of work. Therefore; when TSA employees show up there and get snotty with me they should expect me to get snotty back.
Fortunately, one seldom sees TSA employees in the airline clubs. Not seeing or having to interact with TSA employees in a section of the airport makes the price of admission well worth it.















