![]() |
Originally Posted by Dovster
Face it, jfe, you are madly in love with me and can't live without me!
:Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <end puke smiley>
Originally Posted by Dovster
I would never boycott Randy but, hopefully, the moderation in Omni will now be such as to give me little reason to post here.
|
Originally Posted by tom911
OMNI, in its current form, is nothing like the OMNI when I started on FT four years ago. It seems to have become a political forum, when there are other venues on the internet that can adequately address those topics.
^^^ |
Originally Posted by tom911
... If we're down to one moderator there now, maybe the time has come to shut it down and get back to miles and points.
AND, I think that if the decision is made to shut Omni down, it will also eventually eliminate a lot of problem posts on the legitimate Flyertalk travel and travel-related sections of Flyertalk as well. |
Sorry to see you go, Scott - just as I was sorry to see Sean leave.
Jésus, bon courage! :) Again, many thanks to all three of you. |
Originally Posted by tom911
Does OMNI, in its current form, serve the interests of our host? It has nothing to do about points and miles, and seems to be awfully labor intensive for moderators. If we're down to one moderator there now, maybe the time has come to shut it down and get back to miles and points. OMNI, in its current form, is nothing like the OMNI when I started on FT four years ago. It seems to have become a political forum, when there are other venues on the internet that can adequately address those topics. Randy closed it down for a while, and when he bought it back IIRC said it was squarely in the hands of the regular users as to whether the respite would be long term. Or not. Certain yahoos on there have so far managed to have signature lines for ALL members abolished recently as they could not resist political baiting and attacks using them. So ALL members are deprived from hearing about upcoming "Doos" or readily accessing super useful signature lines like links to Blondebombers Star Alliance and hotel chain compilations and tabulations etc. ALL FT'ers lose out from that as a direct result. |
Originally Posted by ozstamps
Agree 100% Tom. ^ ^ ^
Randy closed it down for a while, and when he bought it back IIRC said it was squarely in the hands of the regular users as to whether the respite would be long term. Or not. Certain yahoos on there have so far managed to have signature lines for ALL members abolished recently as they could not resist political baiting and attacks using them. So ALL members are deprived from hearing about upcoming "Doos" or readily accessing super useful signature lines like links to Blondebombers Star Alliance and hotel chain compilations and tabulations etc. ALL FT'ers lose out from that as a direct result. In Omni these signature lines were never a problem, the problems occured when "certain yahoos" took the political statements out of Omni into the rest of the board, and when "certain yahoos" started making Omni-like posts and statements in the core of Flyertalk; the miles and points boards. A couple of these "yahoos" were members that had never even posted in Omni before. |
Originally Posted by tom911
Does OMNI, in its current form, serve the interests of our host? It has nothing to do about points and miles, and seems to be awfully labor intensive for moderators. If we're down to one moderator there now, maybe the time has come to shut it down and get back to miles and points. OMNI, in its current form, is nothing like the OMNI when I started on FT four years ago. It seems to have become a political forum, when there are other venues on the internet that can adequately address those topics.
And it's completely unknown to me why the place is allowed to continue in it's current form, or at all for that matter. Enough is enough. |
Originally Posted by ozstamps
Agree 100% Tom. ^ ^ ^ Randy closed it down for a while, and when he bought it back IIRC said it was squarely in the hands of the regular users as to whether the respite would be long term. Or not.
Originally Posted by ScottC
That is incorrect. And what Forum's signature lines WERE the reason Randy closed down the Signature feature if it was NOT OMNI as you claim? ? |
Originally Posted by ozstamps
What is "incorrect" in the 2 parts of my post you quoted and labeled "incorrect"?
And what Forum's signature lines WERE the reason Randy closed down the Signature feature if it was NOT OMNI as you claim? ? Omni itself had nothing to do with ending the offering of signature lines. |
Originally Posted by ScottC
I agree. And it's completely unknown to me why the place is allowed to continue in it's current form, or at all for that matter. Enough is enough. I found Randy's previous comment on it below. After some members begged to have the Forum re-instated. Seems like some folks have now washed their hands of OMNI, and are throwing it back yet again as his problem? :(
Originally Posted by Randy Petersen
OMNI was not an idea of mine. The early days of FT did not include OMNI and it was only the constant lobbying of members that got that forum it's place on FT. .... That particular forum has, as noted, been the subject of a few problems over our past - all because race, religion and war is a topic that has spawned wars for many thousands of years and it's likely not going to change no matter what we do on FT. ... My guess - you wanted it, you got it, learn to live with it. Please don't throw it back to me as my problem. |
Originally Posted by ScottC
You put Omni and the signature lines in one arguement. The signature lines were just fine until some people OUTSIDE Omni decided to mess around with them.
Omni itself had nothing to do with ending the offering of signature lines. IMO, politics have no place on Flyertalk since it polarizes people and creates ill will that spills out to other places including the new low of people rating Birthday threads a 1 * :( |
Originally Posted by peteropny
.... including the new low of people rating Birthday threads a 1 * :( It was good to see Randy announce yesterday he was looking into the small group of (IMHO) warped sickos who have made an art form of this alienating "tactic" in the past 3 or 4 months: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=359978 The same group of about a dozen FT'ers clearly email or IM each other to gang up on threads posted by those they do not 'like', and rapidly rate the thread "1" - yes even for friendly and Community bonding "Happy Birthday" type threads. Or post inane comments to a thread almost in unison, as the case may be. Often a group of them will post the same silly quote in a conga line with rolleyes or other such heavy intellectual input, as Canarsie so ably highlighted a couple of days back in this forum. I saw it occur last week - a Birthday thread I posted on first when it had zero "votes" went to a dozen "1" votes in about an hour. Simply as these yahoos did not 'like' the person having the birthday. I would bet $100 I could accurately offer Randy if he is interested, a core of member names who will certainly appear as rating the lowest possible "1" to that thread. I might add none of these brave souls actually posted to the thread that I could see. Randy did add a Happy Birthday greeting himself to that thread, but it did not stop these disruptive geniuses. This gang "1" dinging became the new "game" soon after Randy removed the reputation feature, that a number of the same members IMHO were heavily involved in abusing - causing its permanent removal. The name of the game changed - the object remained the same. And there are also gang stalkers out there, and it has been more evident since about mid-year, as reported here, in another documented instance of a small group rating threads "1" for no apparent reason other than to be disruptive to a member: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=332171 If Randy takes away the OMNI playground it IMHO will get worse not better in General Forums, as a small core of FT'ers will have even more time on their disruptive hands, you can bet on that. :td: The "tactic" works both ways of course. As I pointed out in post #3 of this very thread, this thread was mysteriously rated "5" with a bunch of '5' votes before even ONE reply was posted, and all this within about an hour of the thread being started. Randy might find instructive the viewing of the folks who gleefully voted "5" so very, very fast? I wonder aloud if those names tally pretty neatly with certain Birthday "1" voting patterns? |
Originally Posted by ozstamps
As I pointed out in post #3 of this very thread, this thread was mysteriously rated "5" with a bunch of '5' votes before even ONE reply was posted, and all this within about an hour of the thread being started. Randy might find instructive the viewing of the folks who gleefully voted "5" so very, very fast?
I wonder aloud if those names tally pretty neatly with certain Birthday "1" voting patterns? We're all very lucky to have you around to point out that sort of thing would clearly be indicative of a MASSIVE coordinated conspiracy. Otherwise, some people might just naively think that (quelle horror!) more than one person shares the same view. |
BTW, Glen, my birthday is coming up. Should anyone wish me well with a thread, feel free to vote it 1*. Somehow, I'll summon the courage to soldier on.
Hey, feel free to "wonder aloud" any criticisms for that matter. It's always so much fun when you do that. It really makes the weekends sail by! Again, I think with enough therapy, I might survive the knowledge that some people on an Internet Bulletin Board don't like me. [/heavy intelelctual input] :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by robb
BTW, Glen, my birthday is coming up. Should anyone wish me well with a thread, feel free to vote it 1*. Somehow, I'll summon the courage to soldier on.
Randy has indicated that he might ban those involve in the birthday thread attacks and I think he would be 100% justified in doing so. Besides the fact that their behavior was despicable, it also weakens what could be a valuable FlyerTalk function. Personally, I hope you have a very happy birthday -- and there is absolutely no sarcasm in that. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:07 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.