I never stated that you were involved.

It is not a secret that anytime an unflattering comment is posted about that pathetic little site that the e-mails start flying.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/biggrin.gif Finally, CameraGuy posts something that makes good sense.... he is indeed at a loss... http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/rolleyes.gif

techgirl - like you I am at a complete loss at what CameraGuy is talking about. (Not an unusual situation to be in I might add.)

Like you I do not have: "a clue of what he is speaking." I have not seen for very many months, nor am I aware of in any way any email from or about any persons re the site CameraGuy is totally and perpetually obsessed with. [b]

Techgirl as you surmised he has not a shred of evidence to support his bizarre allegations above, and his silence on that score supports it.

His original comment and the one above re-iterating it, is totally un-called for, totally inaccurate, and very rude. And most other Flyertalker's would apologise had they made it (twice) with no basis in fact.

For the umpteenth time to be referring to something on Randy's Forum as a "pathetic little site" is something he was checked previously about - as recently on page one of this thread.

IMO he insults a large group of senior Flyertalkers by his constant slurs.

When it was pointed out on this thread: "Randy has made it clear in the past he has no problem with that site and wished it success". CameraGuy's response was "So What" ..... and re-iterated later he was "proud" of his response. And now repeats the insult.

Nothing more needs be said IMO. His posts speak eloquently for him.



------------------
~ Glen ~ sipping bubbly from a UA 747-400 exit row 15 near you SOON!

If my posts "clearly speak for themselves", then why are you so obsessed with them?

Oh my yes, what an astoundin' "accusation" this is. Surely in the history of FT no one has never ever communicated with 'friends' in order to get them to post in a given thread. It must be the first time ever. Whether such messages are relayed by email, phone, or hidden in bags of Doritos found in hotel minibars is kinda moot, no?

CG's suspension is no more pathetic than ozstamps' given that they were both issued at the same time. The only difference being that CG did not promptly return under a different handle. Nor get that handle banned too.

Getting lessons on manners from ozstamps would be funny if that pathetic liar and master defrauder of airline and hotel loyalty programs ("Hello United? I didn't get my 1K drink coupons! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/frown.gif " ) hadn't lost any credibility in the matter a long time ago.

Oh my yes, what an astoundin' "accusation" this is. Surely in the history of FT no one has never ever communicated with 'friends' in order to get them to post in a given thread. It must be the first time ever. Whether such messages are relayed by email, phone, or hidden in bags of Doritos found in hotel minibars is kinda moot, no?

CG's suspension is no more pathetic than ozstamps' given that they were both issued at the same time. The only difference being that CG did not promptly return under a different handle. Nor get that handle banned too.

Getting lessons on manners from ozstamps would be funny if that pathetic liar and master defrauder of airline and hotel loyalty programs ("Hello United? I didn't get my 1K drink coupons! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/frown.gif " ) hadn't lost any credibility in the matter a long time ago.

Seems somebody decided to trot out his extra handle to post flames he wouldn't want to post with his main handle, so as not to get banned again. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/biggrin.gif

To get back on topic. This site's pre-opening page seems like it is not a bad idea. As much as I enjoy FT, many times it has become airlinebusiness.com rather than a FF BB. I think that I will check out FT.org and maybe will be able to enjoy both sites.

------------------
dallasflyer, Let's put the fun back in FlyerTalk!

Actually my prior research shows that bus dude has never been banned... either under that handle or that which he normally posts under. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif

Dude... I'm on to you.

techgirl,

Otto will never let the facts get in the way of one of his attacks.

But, since his accusation is clearly aimed at me, I will respond to him again.

1. I have NEVER posted to FT under any handle other than CameraGuy.

2. During the ENTIRE time of my suspension, I followed the wishes of Randy and did not post. I have far to much integrity to have ignored his express wishes.

Your obsession with my posting priveledges is flattering, but I think your energy may be better used in other endevours.

Did I mention CameraGuy? Nope. But here he comes running when the subject of personal flaming is brought up. Rather like Pavlov and those poor dogs.

On the other hand, by golly, if CameraGuy wants to point the finger at himself, he can go right ahead. But it's his doing, not mine.

:ROLLEYES:

My OBSESSION with your posting privileges is flattering?

When have I ever once mentioned your posting privileges?

Again, I'm at a loss... and curious how you have dragged me into this. I merely welcomed Gaucho back from his noted absence on FT (see the thread in FT Community) and from this I am now e-mailing others to encourage piling on and discussing your posting privileges?

I beg your pardon, but I don't even know you... why would I care about your posting habits?

techgirl,

I owe you an apology. My post was obviously not clear and that is my fault.

It was a two part post and only the first part was directed towards you. The second part was directed towards otto and otto only.

My bad.

Back on topic.

Folks, the truth sometimes hurts... and I know that for many around here its nothing short of heresy to disagree with the people that run this site, but the facts are the facts, and they are undisputable. Like it or not... what has been posted on www.flyertalk.org can hardly be argued with. Seagull Management has to be the best description of what Flyertalk.com has been all about for a long time.


------------------
Gaucho100K