FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Luggage Check-Through and Baggage Limitations? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/638612-luggage-check-through-baggage-limitations.html)

steve32 Dec 27, 2006 10:30 am


Originally Posted by Dave Noble (Post 6899068)
60Kg ; yuppers. I travel ( unless impossible to do so ) with all my own gear. Places may hire cylinders, however they tend to be cruddy low capacity aluminium cylinders and often do not have DIN fittings plus tend to be filled to a low pressure. Often no weight belt is needed so that isn't an issue :)

When on my own at 45m, I do not want to be relying on equipment which I do not know how well has been maintained

Makes me very happy with the new BA luggage policies :) .. 114Kg allowance...mmmmmm

Dave

I was in a dive club based at Fort Meade (NSA), and at a charity quarry dive we hosted, there were a couple cave divers who had extremely extensive equipment. They too didn't need a weight belt as the battery packs for the multiple U/W spotlights were plenty. Of course they had large double tanks, on seperate regulators (with a valved connecting pipe), a small steel tank for back-up air (what normal divers would consider a smaller sized regular diving tank), and yet another tank of Argon (for inflating the dry suit--less bouyant and better heat retention).

Watching those guys suit up was a pretty good lesson in itself on diving safety, and how it's best to be "sphincter relaxation challenged" (--that's as Politicallty Correct as I get! :rolleyes:) about that.

Steve

steve32 Dec 27, 2006 10:42 am


Originally Posted by number_6
I'm afraid you will come to regret your long routings, which are very tiring (I've done them, and they are tiring even in F, never mind J) and this trip will seem more like an ordeal than a special treat. Good luck and do lots more research to mitigate the problems and make it work better.

I was a bit surprized to learn that HKG is within 200 miles of the same distance from WAS in either direction. Thus, w/ BA via LHR-NRT was shorter than CX via LAX-HKG-NRT, and BA's J product is supposed to be even a bit better than CX's. I guess we will have to "suffer" through the short YYZ-LHR J flight and look forward to a better J on LHR-NRT.

As for my parents' routing back, unfortunate but there was nothing available in J in any other routing (I tried via Canada, India, S. Africa, S. America, and routing through NRT then onto a direct AA flight over the top--nothing shook loose J except for what I already had [as a reminder: AKL-(QF)-BNE-(CX)-HKG-(BA)-LHR-(AA)-JFK-(AA/Am. Eagle)-BWI :eek: ] It's already ticketed, so the routing is in stone now.

Steve

BTW, is there a record for the most number of flights in a "leg" (between a single pair of stopovers) in which each flight is on a different oneworld carrier? Does "American Eagle" count as a "different" carrier than "American Airlines" (like "Jet Connect" and "Qantas")? Should I start another thread on this quirky subject? :p

number_6 Dec 27, 2006 11:40 am


Originally Posted by steve32 (Post 6908323)
...[as a reminder: AKL-(QF)-BNE-(CX)-HKG-(BA)-LHR-(AA)-JFK-(AA/Am. Eagle)-BWI :eek: ] It's already ticketed, so the routing is in stone now....

I think AKL-BNE recently converted to being a Jetconnect route from QF mainline (so quite a step down in J quality), and BNE-HKG is often served by CX regional J (seats like AA F seats, not the normal CX J bed used on long-haul; CX is severely short of planes, so using their short-haul config on the less important routes). HKG-LHR should get the new J on BA, which helps. Quite an achievement to get this booked, in any case.

Dave Noble Dec 27, 2006 12:51 pm


Originally Posted by steve32 (Post 6908269)
They too didn't need a weight belt as the battery packs for the multiple U/W spotlights were plenty. Of course they had large double tanks, on seperate regulators (with a valved connecting pipe), a small steel tank for back-up air (what normal divers would consider a smaller sized regular diving tank), and yet another tank of Argon (for inflating the dry suit--less bouyant and better heat retention).

Watching those guys suit up was a pretty good lesson in itself on diving safety, and how it's best to be "sphincter relaxation challenged" (--that's as Politicallty Correct as I get! :rolleyes:) about that.

Steve

Sounds like a sensible set up. Other than the lights ( since I don't do cave diving yet ) and the drysuit/argon ( water in sydney is warm) it sounds like a pretty typical setup .

Dave

Dave Noble Dec 27, 2006 12:58 pm


Originally Posted by number_6 (Post 6908585)
I think AKL-BNE recently converted to being a Jetconnect route from QF mainline (so quite a step down in J quality),.

Looking at the timetable the morning QF flight seems to be a normal Qantas flight operated with a 763. The evening flight , on days it runs, seems to be Qantas with a 73H. The morning flight hopefully will have dreamtime seats

Dave

serfty Dec 27, 2006 4:50 pm


Originally Posted by Dave Noble

Originally Posted by number_6
I think AKL-BNE recently converted to being a Jetconnect route from QF mainline (so quite a step down in J quality), and BNE-HKG is often served by CX regional J (seats like AA F seats, not the normal CX J bed used on long-haul; CX is severely short of planes, so using their short-haul config on the less important routes). HKG-LHR should get the new J on BA, which helps. Quite an achievement to get this booked, in any case.

Looking at the timetable the morning QF flight seems to be a normal Qantas flight operated with a 763. The evening flight , on days it runs, seems to be Qantas with a 73H. The morning flight hopefully will have dreamtime seats

Dave

This is to change in March with the morning Flight to be operated by a 73H (instead of a 763) and the jetconnect flight frequency increased to daily.

I found out via ExpertFlyer when checking the seat maps for one of my bookings. More here:
Qantas are replacing 763's ...
.

The one aircraft generally operates (on a daily basis) AKL-BNE(QF116), BNE-AKL(QF115),AKL-MEL(QF134) & MEL-AKL(QF39).

Also since QF25/QF26 changed routing from BNE to MEL, the 763's running that routing have normally been of a domestic configuration with the 'Millenium' seating in J.

Dave Noble Dec 27, 2006 6:24 pm


Originally Posted by serfty (Post 6909952)
This is to change in March with the morning Flight to be operated by a 73H (instead of a 763) and the jetconnect flight frequency increased to daily.

I didn't check through till march since the comment was that it had already changed but checking Expert Flyer for late April, it does indeed show QF116 operated by a 73H.

For those wanting to stick to a 767, the AA codeshare (AA7376) is still apparantly operated with a 763. Wonder how you merge 2 aircraft like that :)

For J trans tasman, definately an incentive these days to use an airline such as EK or LA to get a real international cabin

Dave

Kiwi Flyer Dec 27, 2006 7:26 pm

or NZ (but make sure to get a 747 or 777 flight rather than A320 or 767)

LA doesnt fly AKL-BNE but EK does (with 77W).

steve32 Dec 28, 2006 8:34 am

All you guys are a true wealth of information.

Thank you very much!

Steve


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:45 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.