![]() |
Originally Posted by steve32
(Post 6889595)
Is BA so strict that they will zap me on the extra half-inch of the 22" TravelPro? The bag was supposed to be within the carry-on limitations for international travel--that's why I got it....
So, when the next security alert comes, you can be sure that the 22 inch Travelpro will not be allowed as carryon out of LHR. They do this to reduce the security checking workload (fewer bags to check, less volume to check). It is an absurd situation and very damaging to BA. |
Originally Posted by christep
And, by the way, I'm not sure where the OP has got this idea of "international carryon" from. The US has essentially the same restrictions - less than 45 inches in total for carry on and it must fit under a seat or in an overhead locker (see, eg, https://www.aa.com/content/travelInf...lowance.jhtml), which isn't much different from 22*14*9. As for the size of AA domestic carry-ons, I was very surprised when I read that on the website. I just did 8.5 days MRs (34 segments) in the last 2.5 weeks, with my 22" TravelPro, and I can assure you that mine was about the smallest carry-on bag I observed. The norm was at least 50% larger, and there were a couple bags that had to have been nearly 100% larger than my bag! Apparantly they didn't have any problems getting those past TSA and the Gate Agents. I'm getting a 25" TravelPro for domestic long weekend jaunts (extended MRs ;) ) which I'm sure will not be blinked at at all, given what I've seen. Steve |
Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer
(Post 6889623)
Actually BAA (ie airport security). If they decide to check it in the sizer then it must fully fit including handles and wheels. If it doesnt then must go to check it in, even if this means clearing immigration as a transit pax and/or missing your flight. OTOH they may not give it a second glance. Up to you if you want to take the risk.
Is this just for BA flights? My parents' return will be on a BA flight into LHR, but an AA flight out of it. Thanks, Steve |
Originally Posted by steve32
Is BA so strict that they will zap me on the extra half-inch of the 22" TravelPro? The bag was supposed to be within the carry-on limitations for international travel--that's why I got it.
Steve That should be able to get past BAA? Thanks, Steve |
No the BAA baggage rules apply to all airlines. If it's going to get nabbed at a UK airport it will happen at/before the security check. After the security check they want you to buy lots of stuff in the shopping mall.
Edit: if the real overall dimensions of your bag, including handles, wheels, etc are less than 22*14*9 then no problem. |
Originally Posted by steve32
I'm getting a 25" TravelPro for domestic long weekend jaunts (extended MRs ;) ) which I'm sure will not be blinked at at all, given what I've seen.
Steve Sorry, I had the wrong baseline as to what I already had. The 25" would be as flagrant as the baddies I saw, and I wouldn't want to be looked at askance by my fellow FlyerTalkers, now would I? :rolleyes: Thanks, Steve |
Originally Posted by steve32
(Post 6891504)
If they do nab it, won't they (hopefully) just gate check it (like American Eagle flights)?
Is this just for BA flights? My parents' return will be on a BA flight into LHR, but an AA flight out of it. No gate check. If connecting and they have a problem with your carryon then you would get stopped at flight connection centre (FCC) and asked to proceed landside (through immigration) to check your bag in, even if this meant you would miss your flight. If merely departing then you would get sent back to check in by security. |
Originally Posted by steve32
(Post 6891472)
As for the size of AA domestic carry-ons, I was very surprised when I read that on the website. I just did 8.5 days MRs (34 segments) in the last 2.5 weeks, with my 22" TravelPro, and I can assure you that mine was about the smallest carry-on bag I observed. The norm was at least 50% larger, and there were a couple bags that had to have been nearly 100% larger than my bag! Apparantly they didn't have any problems getting those past TSA and the Gate Agents. I'm getting a 25" TravelPro for domestic long weekend jaunts (extended MRs ;) ) which I'm sure will not be blinked at at all, given what I've seen.
|
Originally Posted by steve32
(Post 6891654)
Actually I mis-spoke. I double checked my past orders on eBags, and I in fact have the 20" TravelPro, which is 20x14x9 inches.
That should be able to get past BAA?... |
Originally Posted by Viajero
I have 18, 20 and 22" Crew5 Travelpros, and the 18" is the only one I can use to go through LHR without problems. The 22 fails the LHR bin test by a long shot, the 20 just makes it, but you have to push it into the bin, and that is, sometimes, not allowed.
The only time I have to get through is at the very beginning of the trip, so I could underpack the 20" TravelPro. I didn't see that there was an 18" TravelPro. :confused: I admit I was only checking eBags (getting more AA miles through their eShopping network). We are taking BA into and back out of LHR (YYZ-LHR-NRT). Do I understand that they shove everyone out the door and through Immigration in that case? In other words, there isn't a dedicated International terminal where if you are just transiting through, you don't have to go through Immigration? Thanks for all your patience and information! Steve |
Originally Posted by steve32
(Post 6898671)
... Do I understand that they shove everyone out the door and through Immigration in that case? In other words, there isn't a dedicated International terminal where if you are just transiting through, you don't have to go through Immigration?...
ps. I've taken YYZ-LHR a dozen times (mostly in F, sometimes in J as BA uses 3-class planes for part of the year), and it is a terrible flight (compared to ORD-LHR for example). Too short to get any sleep, and they serve breakfast 2 hours before landing in J -- absurd. So even if you aren't eating (and you shouldn't be, there is lots of better breakfast in the LHR lounges) you are woken up by all the clatter. Plus the YYZ lounge is very shabby, and the food is dismal (used to be very good until 2 years ago, then the lounge manager and chef changed, and it is consistently poor now). YYZ-LHR seems to be the worst of the BA routes to Canada at the moment (YUL and YVR are much better, and the similar DTW-LHR and ORD-LHR are also better -- strange that YYZ is so bad, but I'm sure there is a reason). |
Originally Posted by steve32
(Post 6898671)
...I didn't see that there was an 18" TravelPro. :confused:
|
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
(Post 6889195)
Indeed.. Diving equipment definately eats up allowances; mine comes to about 60Kg :)
Dave I have my diving equipment but deliberately don't have either a tank nor weight belt. Whilst it is a little bulky, it certainly ain't heavy. To the OP: Weight belts and tanks are really easy to hire at your destination and most places assume you don't have gear if your going out on a boat so I really don't see what all the fuss is. |
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
(Post 6899002)
60kg?!! :eek:
I have my diving equipment but deliberately don't have either a tank nor weight belt. Whilst it is a little bulky, it certainly ain't heavy. When on my own at 45m, I do not want to be relying on equipment which I do not know how well has been maintained Makes me very happy with the new BA luggage policies :) .. 114Kg allowance...mmmmmm Dave |
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
(Post 6899068)
60Kg ; yuppers. I travel ( unless impossible to do so ) with all my own gear. Places may hire cylinders, however they tend to be cruddy low capacity aluminium cylinders and often do not have DIN fittings plus tend to be filled to a low pressure. Often no weight belt is needed so that isn't an issue :)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:02 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.