FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Latest rumours within *A (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/342670-latest-rumours-within.html)

alect Aug 3, 2004 12:15 am

Latest rumours within *A
 
Looks like *A is likely to be rolling out mileage upgrades across all members .

That would definitely be an advantage over OW. What's the likelihood that OW will match? (I fear I know the answer :( ).

mhtaipei Aug 3, 2004 1:04 am

oneworld's been losing out for years now. a lot of media hype and marketing, very little substance. wouldn't be surprised if it is dissolved sooner or later. :rolleyes: even skyteam has adopted a more active and integrative approach lately.

wideman Aug 3, 2004 5:53 am


Originally Posted by alect
...*A mileage upgrades across all members...would definitely be an advantage over OW.

For many travelers, that's absolutely true. For those who fly AA internationally, the latter's policy of allowing miles-based upgrades on any fare continues to be a huge plus compared to any current or proposed *A upgrade scheme.

SNA_Flyer Aug 3, 2004 11:39 am

The most important advantages to me regarding OW vs. Star is the lounge benefits (First Class entry) and the airlines involved (CX/BA/QF/AA/LA are the top airlines in their regions, IMO). Star definately has better coverage and more partners.

virtualtroy Aug 5, 2004 1:36 am


Originally Posted by SNA_Flyer
Star definately has better coverage

Except if you want to get from Australia to South America. (*A via N America vs. direct codeshare SYD/AKL-SCL offered by LA/QF). Makes *A RTW tickets very difficult to work with (given mileage limits) until a more direct routing is available.

GUWonder Aug 5, 2004 2:46 am


Originally Posted by SNA_Flyer
The most important advantages to me regarding OW vs. Star is the lounge benefits (First Class entry) and the airlines involved (CX/BA/QF/AA/LA are the top airlines in their regions, IMO). Star definately has better coverage and more partners.

Anyone notice how OneWorld should be read as the One Anglo-American World. CX/QF/AA/BA being in the English-speaking aviation sphere and LA being under the American sphere of influence (read: Pinochet)? :D

Maybe it's time for some diversity. ;)

GUWonder Aug 5, 2004 2:52 am


Originally Posted by virtualtroy
Except if you want to get from Australia to South America. (*A via N America vs. direct codeshare SYD/AKL-SCL offered by LA/QF). Makes *A RTW tickets very difficult to work with (given mileage limits) until a more direct routing is available.

Have you tried getting an award from SYD-LAX as an AA member? It's very, very, very difficult supposedly.

sxpsxpsxp Aug 5, 2004 11:34 am


Originally Posted by GUWonder
Anyone notice how OneWorld should be read as the One Anglo-American World. CX/QF/AA/BA being in the English-speaking aviation sphere and LA being under the American sphere of influence (read: Pinochet)? :D

Maybe it's time for some diversity. ;)

What, you want to invite AeroFlot to join OW instead of SkyTeam? ;)

Viajero Aug 5, 2004 11:58 am


Originally Posted by GUWonder
.. and LA being under the American sphere of influence (read: Pinochet)? :D

Huh? read what? are we back in '73? :)

JuPe Aug 6, 2004 12:57 am


Originally Posted by GUWonder
Anyone notice how OneWorld should be read as the One Anglo-American World. CX/QF/AA/BA being in the English-speaking aviation sphere and LA being under the American sphere of influence (read: Pinochet)? :D

Maybe it's time for some diversity. ;)

At least AY brings some Finno-Ugrian exotism with good routes to Asia ;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.