![]() |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082688)
OK, here you go - the *STAR file from 1999 for OWE. There was no segment limit that I can see beyond the 6 in NA, 4 in each other continent, and you could purchase up to 2 extra segments in each continent except the origin. So in principle such a xONE6 ticket could contain 36 segments.
But I think your arithmetic is faulty. Let's see:
I wonder who got the most segments? Perhaps we need a separate thread where people can brag:D (I can't brag - my max is 17, which only happened due to a schedule change) |
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 31082373)
Back in the pre e-ticket days, a physical ticket was a booklet with 4 vouchers. Each booklet had it's own ticket number.
Your 20 segment xONEx would be comprised of 5 such books of vouchers, often presented stapled together. The five 'tickets' would be recorded in the GDS's under the one PNR. So 'Many (tickets) to one (PNR)'. I didn't think it could be done the other way. Yes, it is possible to have more than one set of conjuncted tickets in one PNR. However, it is against most airlines' rule to issue different tickets across married segments. For example, if TPE-HKG-CGK is booked together and HKG is a transit, you can't have TPE-HKG on one ticket and HKG-CGK on another. |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 31082729)
How do you have no segment in one ticket? I don't get it...
|
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 31082653)
But from the OWE rule sheet of Dec-2007 (yes I have a copy!)....
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082658)
The oldest rule sheet I can immediately find is 2006, which had the 20 limit. And that was flight segments.
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 31082729)
How do you have no segment in one ticket? I don't get it...
|
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082327)
I'm only talking about OWEs. I am 100% sure that it was possible - my TA used do it all the time. But this was quite a few years ago now.
Another possibility is that when different systems are involved. For example, an agent using Sabre (either a TA or an AAgent) created the PNR and issued the RTW. The original ticket contains LA segments, which is on a different partition of Sabre (so a different PNR). Then, you asked another airline to do date change or re-issue, so the LA segments get further booked into a different PNR because other airlines using Amadeus would create a new LA PNR when booking LA flights. Historically, most airlines use their own systems, so you have many PNRs and a lot of cross-platform issues (or loopholes). Now, all oneworld airlines except AA and LA use Amadeus, so these kinds of things are less likely to occur. Back to the question, if someone were to attempt to create two PNRs with segments of the same airline that should be married, I suppose the agent would be looking for an ADM. Sure, the agent may also get lucky and not get caught. |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082658)
Edit. It was certainly possible to have 20 segments, but I thought I recalledl more being possible. The oldest rule sheet I can immediately find is 2006, which had the 20 limit. And that was flight segments.
The 16 segment thing (including surface segments) was imposed by the "enhancement" of e-ticketing. Once e-ticketing arrived there was an overlapping period where paper tickets could also be issued, but then they could only be 16 segments (so there was no advantage to paper ticketing). |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 31082734)
Oh what I would do with 36 segments!!
But I think your arithmetic is faulty. Let's see:
I wonder who got the most segments? Perhaps we need a separate thread where people can brag:D (I can't brag - my max is 17, which only happened due to a schedule change) |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082749)
Was the removal of open-dated ticketing was another "Enhancement" brought about by e-ticketing?
|
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 31082770)
xONEx are definitely limited to 20 segments total, though.
|
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 31082758)
If you set up a ticket, input your name, phone, FFNo, etc., then cancel all the flights, the PNR still remains intact as a shell.
2. No, the PNR has a risk of being purged if it contains no live segments. I know Sabre now doesn't really purge PNRs that "had" a segment in the future (so if on 01JAN you booked a segment on 01APR, and then cancelled it immediately, the PNR wouldn't really get purged before 01APR), but I'm not sure about Amadeus. |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082780)
Yes, they are now, but the point is that they weren't in 1999!
|
No. See, for example, this discussion here of a 30 segment journey by [MENTION=5]3544quebec[/MENTION] (who is still active here) in 1999 (in FIrst for US$6000!) (and also the STAR file I copied above)
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/1690902-post1.html |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082796)
No. See, for example, this discussion here of a 30 segment journey by [MENTION=5]3544quebec[/MENTION] (who is still active here) in 1999 (in FIrst for US$6000!) (and also the STAR file I copied above)
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/1690902-post1.html If it were possible to have 30 segments, it may mean that paper tickets were not limited to booklet of 5, but I wonder in this case how things all fit (fare calculations, etc.). |
I remember fare calculations as a simple A4 sheet stapled onto the (hand-written) ticket.
|
Originally Posted by MiamiPrep
(Post 30762924)
I have routing LAX-JFK-MIA on 4/15/19 for DONE04. There is D availability on each of the 2 flights individually, but AA says it is booked as a connection and there is no D for JFK-MIA (even though EF shows D3). Is this something new? Any ideas how to get the segments to 'force'? For now I'm in Y JFK-MIA. (AA is correct. On EF I entered LAX-MIA with connection in JFK, and there is D0).
Back to the OP's predicament: if it hasn't been sorted out already, wouldn't a wait-list request for "D" on the JFK-MIA sector do the trick? Sure, it's insane that it can't be booked in one call, but to get the seat desired on the flight in question, asking (via the wait-list) should be the surest fire way to communicate the request to the revenue management team/algorithm. This said: I also fondly recall the flexibility that paper tickets allowed. The distinction between ticket and reservation was much clearer back then, and I'd often have the bulk of my ticket initially issued as OPEN, simply calling the operating (or marketing) airline and creating a new PNR to hold the reservation of the flights I'd wanted to take next. As long as I provided the ticket-number for them to note along with the reservation request, this was never a problem. I'd sometimes have to have the paper ticket "stickered" to reflect the reserved flight, but often, the OPEN ticket was simply uplifted as-is. Ah - the halcyon days. |
Originally Posted by checkerboard
(Post 31082852)
This said: I also fondly recall the flexibility that paper tickets allowed. The distinction between ticket and reservation was much clearer back then, and I'd often have the bulk of my ticket initially issued as OPEN, simply calling the operating (or marketing) airline and creating a new PNR to hold the reservation of the flights I'd wanted to take next. As long as I provided the ticket-number for them to note along with the reservation request, this was never a problem. I'd sometimes have to have the paper ticket "stickered" to reflect the reserved flight, but often, the OPEN ticket was simply uplifted as-is. Ah - the halcyon days.
|
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082828)
I remember fare calculations as a simple A4 sheet stapled onto the (hand-written) ticket.
The only handwritten ticket I have is an AS "visit pass" ticket issued by the AS GSA (General Sales Agent) in Taiwan from 2002 or 2003. |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31082796)
No. See, for example, this discussion here of a 30 segment journey by [MENTION=5]3544quebec[/MENTION] (who is still active here) in 1999 (in FIrst for US$6000!) (and also the STAR file I copied above)
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/1690902-post1.html I'm sad to say that I have not progressed in life from my infant obsessions (I still suck my thumb too) |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 31082822)
Wow that's something for me to learn. The oldest rule I have (from BA) is dated 2005 and had the 20-segment restriction. I only started to learn all these things around 2002.
If it were possible to have 30 segments, it may mean that paper tickets were not limited to booklet of 5, but I wonder in this case how things all fit (fare calculations, etc.). The move to 20 segments was drastic (and counting intercontinental segments) seriously devalued these tickets and made the 5 and 6 continent tickets less viable. |
My 28 segments DONEWC3 was issued in 2003.
To attach fare calculation to every coupon, CX Tokyo ticketing office made duplicated copy of fare calculation on small papers, and attached them to back side of all coupons. So, very thick paper ticket. BTW, It contained day trip from LHR to HEL. At HEL immigration, officer checked my ticket about 30 minutes. |
Yes, I remember CX's way of doing it as well. That was on a printed ATB ticket, which I had to have a major reroute on whilst at HKG. The ticketing people there used to be very good.
|
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31081877)
I know we have a few TAs in this forum. Could one of them confirm that this is indeed no longer possible? My TAs did it for me many times in the past.
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 31082004)
To be clear, I believe that anabolism is talking only about a specific OneWorld RTW product, xONEx fared tickets. On other, regular tickets, yes, this can be done. But I'm fairly certain that it was never a possibility for xONEx tickets in OneWorld.
|
Originally Posted by checkerboard
(Post 31082852)
Back to the OP's predicament: if it hasn't been sorted out already, wouldn't a wait-list request for "D" on the JFK-MIA sector do the trick? Sure, it's insane that it can't be booked in one call, but to get the seat desired on the flight in question, asking (via the wait-list) should be the surest fire way to communicate the request to the revenue management team/algorithm.
|
FWIW, my first J RTW ticket with what would become One World was in 1990 ticketed with BA exBAH. Repeated in 1991 ex DHA with BA. Alas I no longer have access to the full routings or the rules. But I can state I wasn't worried about maximum segments.
But the rules had to have existed at that time..... Just wandering Fred |
Originally Posted by wandering_fred
(Post 31085341)
FWIW, my first J RTW ticket with what would become One World was in 1990 ticketed with BA exBAH. Repeated in 1991 ex DHA with BA. Alas I no longer have access to the full routings or the rules. But I can state I wasn't worried about maximum segments.
But the rules had to have existed at that time..... Just wandering Fred Sorry to stray so off topic but us old folks also tend to ramble |
Originally Posted by 3544quebec
(Post 31085416)
Those were the days when QF/BA had a strong relationship and their RTW fares would from time to time offer the option at no extra cost on an F fare of flying Concorde transatlantic (did it twice) or cruising across on the QE2 and the BA Executive Club actually had a presence in Australia and offered rewards like dinner for 6 at Rockpool in its heyday - where's the emoji for old man reminiscing
Sorry to stray so off topic but us old folks also tend to ramble Likewise, apologies for old person reminiscences. |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31087231)
I also did Concorde on an AONE3 ....
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 31087231)
Likewise, apologies for old person reminiscences.
|
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 31083703)
If you're only talking about a way for a reservations agent to request that RM approve a segment that is otherwise unable to be booked, yes, the segments could be waitlisted or simply desired, then the PNR queued to RM, but none of that is a solution, because it can't be ticketed with that segment missing, unless the segment is added as a surface segment, and the ticket would need to be reissued as a re-route if the flight segment gets confirmed. It's also unclear that RM would approve the segments. A better approach is to book the segments with a long enough time in between to break the marriage, or as code-shares if possible (which may only be possible if the ticket is issued by a TA or an airline other than the one that operates the flights in question).
Code:
ADVANCE RESERVATIONS/TICKETINGWhether you will find a TA or a system that can ticket it in that state is a different question. Amadeus can handle open sectors on an eticket. Not sure about Sabre. |
Originally Posted by Calchas
(Post 31088440)
The rules allow the ticket to be issued with a waitlisted reservation or with an open sector, except for the first international sector.
|
Perhaps we can organise a Flyertalk meet for those of us with walking frames - but don't leave it too long
|
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 31083673)
Keeping in mind the difference between PNRs (reservations) and tickets, in the old manual days, it was possible to have one ticket that had coupons for flights in different PNRs. An agent would create different PNRs, issue a manual ticket, and update the different PNRs to contain the manual ticket number. I'm not sure how it would be done in today's automated world. Ignoring limited-changes PNRs that are automatically issued due to flights on multiple airlines, code-shares, etc., since those are not germane. It might be possible using low-level SABRE or Amadeus. But it's a theoretical question with no practical application.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:21 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.