FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Air Berlin to Join oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/1109635-air-berlin-join-oneworld.html)

DownUnderFlyer Jul 27, 2010 7:30 pm


Originally Posted by SwissexLUG (Post 14371993)
The integration process will be a challenge but I don't think AB is a "classical" LCC like Ryanair or easyJet. AB already works more or less like a network carrier and this may help in the integration process.

Some features:
- AB allows connections and checks your bags through
- AB has a frequent flyer program with other airline partners (S7 among others)
- AB has two classes of services (long-haul)
- AB uses main airports (e.g. FRA,TXL instead of Hahn or Schönfeld), most of which already have a OW lounge
- AB's IT is connected to the ESTA, API databases for US bound passengers
- you can buy AB ticket through consolidators and/or online agencies (e.g. ebookers, expedia.de, etc.)
- you should be able to buy AB tickets through TAs as well (I'm not sure though)
- AB has a limited hub-and-spoke model in TXL & DUS (you can for instance fly from ZRH via DUS to MIA, your bag is checked through, you get boarding passes for the DUS-MIA leg in ZRH, the check-in agent at ZRH enters your API details for the US and checks whether you are ESTA compliant, etc.)


AB is more like B6 in the US which offers you connecting flights, booking via online agencies such as Expedia, etc. They are a low-fare network carrier.


Originally Posted by IC6A (Post 14371942)
I guess they want:
1>, OW Frequent flyers who may purchase its Business class ticket to support their revunue on long haul routes
2>, OW's network so AB can sell ticket in Germany to its members to anywhere in the world
3>, OW's structure that will make AB more competitive
4>, OW's leisure travelers who will use AB's European network to travel within EU. AB will have the potential to sell majority of the Europe Pass sectors for its frequency and network.
5>, OW's member airlines to work together with AB to make DUS a better hub with a future Berlin hub in the new Berlin airport which due to open in 2012. So when AB fully integrated into OW (possibly late 2011 early 2012) OW will have the new Berlin BBL airport (code BER) as one hub
6>, OW's international routes into Frankfurt so AB could benefits from the codeshare out of FRA.

I agree with all of this. However I don't think the advantage for AB is as strong as it might be for a carrier better connected at the classical hubs.


Originally Posted by stimpy (Post 14373775)
As far as I can tell, this benefits only Germans

AB has a lot of point to point connections outside Germany and with their hub in Palma is a nice option for that corner of the Mediterranean as well.

Supersonic Swinger Jul 28, 2010 1:47 am


Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer (Post 14376774)
I agree with all of this. However I don't think the advantage for AB is as strong as it might be for a carrier better connected at the classical hubs.

The hope is that joining OW is another step in AB's evolution as a carrier and this speeds those connections. I know I would welcome ANY opportunity to get to European destinations without having to fly all the way to LHR and then back-track!

Flying Lawyer Jul 28, 2010 2:05 am


Originally Posted by CXBA (Post 14376063)
posts like yours are so unhinged and full of rubbish that seems to me AB accession to OW has irked many die hard supporters of the yellow-and-blue cancer :). Perhaps they were expecting emperor Mayrhuber to step in and snap in a moment this last fastidious home mosquito, although with the current disastrous situation of German banking system it is unclear where LH would get the easy cash they're used to. As for airline profitability, unlike you I am not sure if LH would be one of those without the continuous unwavering support of government, regulators (domestic and EU) and financial establishment.
Potentially unstable fellow travelers. One more reason for me to further avoid travel with LH. :D

Sorry, I am not going to take this anyhow seriously. Disastrous situation of German banking system? Easy cash required for LH? Unwavering support of government? Sorry, but you obviously suffer from some kind of airline paranoia. :p

I do about 100 flight on AB, 100 flights on LH and 30 flights on BA a year and I am certainly a happy traveller with all of them (in the ranking of the names mentioned).

Flying Lawyer Jul 28, 2010 2:18 am


Originally Posted by Traveloguy (Post 14375987)
BA was profitable up until the global financial collapse. You write as if it was decades ago and the company is still provided with support from the government. Let's not rewrite history to suit a little journalistic hypochondria!

So the global financial collapse for BA began in early 2007 when the share price went down dramatically?

mosburger Jul 28, 2010 2:44 am

As far DUS, TXL/BBI and Germany in general are concerned, I do think Air Berlin brings OW airlines and passengers several big advantages:

- Better OW corporate products and sales/after-sales presence regarding corporate customers

- Of course other OW products such as RTW tickets get more interesting especially ex-Germany

- Better presence at German airports, from being able to check-in early to handling irregularities. This has been a major irritation so far, IMHO.

- Better ability to offer alternative OW connections in case of irregularities ex-Germany

etc.etc.

Shuttle Jul 28, 2010 2:44 am


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14378082)
Unwavering support of government? Sorry, but you obviously suffer from some kind of airline paranoia. :p

So, the repeated denial by the authorities for additional frequencies/access to new airports in Germany requested by Middle Eastern-based carriers is not due to tacit government support for a certain German-based airline?

Compare with the abundant growth of London and regional airports in the UK served by Emirates, Qatar, Ethihad...

Then we have the example of Emirates, amongst others, being forced to raise prices by the German Government because they were undercutting Lufthansa:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLJ44779920091119


Shuttle

lhahne Jul 28, 2010 3:36 am


Originally Posted by stimpy (Post 14373775)
As far as I can tell, this benefits only Germans and the only business value to BA and Finnair is an attack on Lufthansa. Right?

I think Finnair wants AB to feed its large Asian operation as AB has Asian routes only to Thailand.

Flying Lawyer Jul 28, 2010 3:40 am


Originally Posted by Shuttle (Post 14378158)
So, the repeated denial by the authorities for additional frequencies/access to new airports in Germany requested by Middle Eastern-based carriers is not due to tacit government support for a certain German-based airline?.

Even if this is fully off-topic, you should make yourself familiar with the contractual situation between Germany and the UAE. The UAE airlines are contractually allowed to fly into four airports in Germany. Emirates operates from Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg und München. Ethihad operates ex Frankfurt only. If they want to have more, they need to renegotiate the bilateral air transport agreement.


Originally Posted by Shuttle (Post 14378158)
Compare with the abundant growth of London and regional airports in the UK served by Emirates, Qatar, Ethihad...

Emirates operates ex London, Newcastle, Manchaster, Glasgow and Birmingham, Ethihad operates from London/Heathrow, Manchester. Four vs. five. Not a big difference at all. And I am pretty sure UK airlines have for historical reasons a higher frequency into the Gulf than LH and AB have.


Originally Posted by Shuttle (Post 14378158)
Then we have the example of Emirates, amongst others, being forced to raise prices by the German Government because they were undercutting Lufthansa:

Certainly interesting, but please read it:


The German government said in a letter seen by Reuters that it was illegal for non-EU airlines such as Emirates to undercut the prices of other carriers on routes from Germany to non-EU destinations, citing its international bilateral air transport agreements and European Parliament rules.
True. German government insisted on the bilateral air transport agreement prohibiting dumping fare. The UAE airlines try to rewrite the bilateral air transport agreement. However, you always need to to modify a contract.

mosburger Jul 28, 2010 3:48 am


Originally Posted by lhahne (Post 14378273)
I think Finnair wants AB to feed its large Asian operation as AB has Asian routes only to Thailand.

I think most if not all European legacy airlines would be glad to get rid of their shorthaul flights. Wasn't Lufthansa considering transferring European flights to Germanwings already a while ago? Not sure if some routes have actually had a low key takeover by GW?

stimpy Jul 28, 2010 4:14 am


Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer (Post 14376774)
AB has a lot of point to point connections outside Germany and with their hub in Palma is a nice option for that corner of the Mediterranean as well.

Thanks. I remember seeing a whole lot of Air Berlin planes in Palma the last time I was there, but I just thought it was a popular destination for Germans! I didn't know they had other PtP routes.

I am pretty ignorant of AB since they don't serve my airport (LYS). And since LH does serve LYS (to FRA, MUC and DUS), all my trips to Germany are with LH or by train. If AB were to add LYS as a destination, I would certainly be interested!

Flying Lawyer Jul 28, 2010 5:14 am


Originally Posted by stimpy (Post 14378338)
I am pretty ignorant of AB since they don't serve my airport (LYS). And since LH does serve LYS (to FRA, MUC and DUS), all my trips to Germany are with LH or by train. If AB were to add LYS as a destination, I would certainly be interested!

What they actually do it to fly into PMI (i) from the Portugese and Spanish mainland and the other Balearic Ilses and (ii) from plenty of German major and regional airports and some European (AMS, BSL, GRZ, VIE, INN, CPH, SZG, ZRH) airports and offer quite convenient connections between these regions via PMI in some cases three times a day. It always looks quite impressive to have a fleet of 20 or so read AB birds in the PMI evening sun.

Shuttle Jul 28, 2010 5:29 am

I am thrilled that OneWorld have become more 'proactive' in recruiting members from an ever diminishing pool and am similarly happy that the latest airline is Air Berlin. Hopefully this will enable BA to maintain a robust schedule to its existing German destinations.

However, this article relating the topic:

http://www.centreforaviation.com/new...n-europe/page1

also makes slightly depressing reading for any OneWorld fanboys/girls, as one could conclude that OW is not trying to get Aer Lingus, which is currently running a beauty parade amongst the alliances, back into OW.

One the other hand, I remember reading, not so many moons ago, OW did stating that it did not need more than 12 members and would stop recruiting after that - clearly a position that they have re-evaluated ;)

Aisle Seat H Jul 29, 2010 4:29 am

AB/OW press conference announcing move can be watched here - http://www.airberlin.com/site/landin...eworld_EN.html

stimpy Jul 29, 2010 4:43 am


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14378505)
What they actually do it to fly into PMI (i) from the Portugese and Spanish mainland and the other Balearic Ilses and (ii) from plenty of German major and regional airports and some European (AMS, BSL, GRZ, VIE, INN, CPH, SZG, ZRH) airports and offer quite convenient connections between these regions via PMI in some cases three times a day. It always looks quite impressive to have a fleet of 20 or so read AB birds in the PMI evening sun.

That reminds me of a trivia question. What is the busiest airport in Europe in the summer? It is PMI! The airport operates 24 hours per day which means they can handle more flights than LHR, FRA, CDG or any other airport.

Traveloguy Jul 29, 2010 7:41 am


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14375154)
And what they certainly need is a capable US addition. OW' AA is currently competing with *A's US, UA, CO and AC. The addition of AB brings OW back into the heart of Europe and this is certainly a move into the right direction, however they need a bit more to compete with giant LH.

Why? AA actually has a very decent network. You don't necessarily have to be the biggest. Also remember MX has joined oneWorld so North American coverage is actually pretty decent.

Out of interest, is there a particular destination which you feel the OW network is unable to cater for?


Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer (Post 14378101)
So the global financial collapse for BA began in early 2007 when the share price went down dramatically?

Yes. Remember in 2007 there were lots of concerns about the system already before the big crash occurred later that year. BA was a very easy target due to it's known pension problem which at the end of the day is still the carrier's core issue to resolve. You still can't deny that it was highly profitable by European standards for a very long time, and arguably more so than even LH. BA's biggest mistake was not putting more money aside sooner to sure up the pension deficit as well as changing the pension itself to either remove benefits or push employees to put more money into the system.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.