![]() |
Hard to give up tricks when you know they will be lost within days..The original deal on UA/BD lasted a long time as the trick was working just the base fare went up..Then the trick was posted again as the base fare went down, but this time the fare was posted elsewhere besides FT and The trick was killed shortly there-after..So now it becomes very difficult to post these tricks..But we shall see what happens. Only time will tell. I for one and others who have tricks up there sleeves will enjoy travelling at a discount ...Sometimes that discount is over $600 :cool: Love the low real low base and the High octane...
|
To me, it's clear that the trick is, at least now, continuing to work no matter what. The same combos of airlines continue to drop the YQ. Only lack of availability in certain fare classes and/or fares expiring are making these things more difficult to book. That was the case with the first ORD-LHR; that was the case with the JNB flight. I think provided we keep "trick it" as the source of the "secrecy", we can post things simply like
$223 ORD-LHR UA/BD November, trick it. Chris |
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 10558691)
To me, it's clear that the trick is, at least now, continuing to work no matter what. The same combos of airlines continue to drop the YQ. Only lack of availability in certain fare classes and/or fares expiring are making these things more difficult to book. That was the case with the first ORD-LHR; that was the case with the JNB flight. I think provided we keep "trick it" as the source of the "secrecy", we can post things simply like
Then those who don't know what "trick it" is can ask for help via PM, while not letting the powers than be close any open loopholes, i.e. lan.com. Chris |
Originally Posted by JoeBagodonuts
(Post 10559203)
maybe I'm giving the airlines too much credit but can't they figure this out much easier than us?
Chris |
Official Position of the Best Rate Guarantee Blog on x-posting deals from Flyertalk
Hello fellow Flyertalkers,
I have been encouraged to provide a formal announcement on behalf of the Best Rate Guarantee Blog (which I own and manage) as to the current stance on our cross-posting. I encourage other bloggers to take their own stance in an effort to curb the crazy cryptic riddles that seem to have dominated these forums in the past few weeks. So, on behalf of the staff at the BRG Blog, we are committed to not cross post airfare deals if: 1) The OP specifically requests it to not be cross-posted and/or 2) The deal is not already scattered around other blogs and forums Thus, if a deal has already been scattered around, and the OP didn't mention their desire to keep it secret, we would reserve the right to cross-post. If a deal has been scattered around, and the OP did mention to keep it secret, we will respect that wish and refrain from cross posting. Also, if we find an airfare deal on our own, we reserve the right to initially post it on our blog, of course. I hope that this will alleviate some of the headaches/worries of the Flyertalk posting community, and that the cryptic deal postings will come to an end. Thank you, David/Roadtripman Owner of the BRG Blog |
I think one of the issue with the MR deal getting out of control is there isn't any rules saying what should / should not do when someone see a MR deal in FT. I skim thorugh the MR forum Sticky and I didn't see anywhere mentioned things like don't call the airlines / travel agents about your ticket while the deal is still live, cross posting to other site,etc (let me know if I am looking at the wrong place). I know as a common courtersy we shouldn't do any of that but I think if our moderators put the do's and don'ts in the sticky we would have less confusion on what should or shouldn't do for everyone.
|
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 10560809)
You'd sure think so, but PL deals dropping YQ have been going on for about a year now. LAN lasted a couple months too.
Chris |
Originally Posted by roadtripman
(Post 10560855)
Hello fellow Flyertalkers,
I have been encouraged to provide a formal announcement on behalf of the Best Rate Guarantee Blog (which I own and manage) as to the current stance on our cross-posting. I encourage other bloggers to take their own stance in an effort to curb the crazy cryptic riddles that seem to have dominated these forums in the past few weeks. So, on behalf of the staff at the BRG Blog, we are committed to not cross post airfare deals if: 1) The OP specifically requests it to not be cross-posted and/or 2) The deal is not already scattered around other blogs and forums Thus, if a deal has already been scattered around, and the OP didn't mention their desire to keep it secret, we would reserve the right to cross-post. If a deal has been scattered around, and the OP did mention to keep it secret, we will respect that wish and refrain from cross posting. Also, if we find an airfare deal on our own, we reserve the right to initially post it on our blog, of course. I hope that this will alleviate some of the headaches/worries of the Flyertalk posting community, and that the cryptic deal postings will come to an end. Thank you, David/Roadtripman Owner of the BRG Blog |
Sounds very reasonable to me as well.
It just doesnt make sense to waste it on FatWallet, shitdeals etc. :td: |
Sure...I will go by what Roadtripman has proposed:
"we are committed to not cross post airfare deals if: 1) The OP specifically requests it to not be cross-posted and/or 2) The deal is not already scattered around other blogs and forums" Exception being if the deal is my own creation. |
Personally, I think the 'default' on this or any other site should be to NOT cross-post unless the OP specifically indicates it's ok (feel free to share with friends, family, s*deals, f*wallet, the NYTimes, Craigslist,etc).
|
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 10580880)
Personally, I think the 'default' on this or any other site should be to NOT cross-post unless the OP specifically indicates it's ok (feel free to share with friends, family, s*deals, f*wallet, the NYTimes, Craigslist,etc).
|
i support putting some CC type restriction on this forum. maybe lessen it to 30 days 30 posts. Also after the FTer hits 15 days 15 posts let an auto message come up informing the person about the existence of such a forum.
|
Originally Posted by UA Fan
(Post 10580966)
i support putting some CC type restriction on this forum. maybe lessen it to 30 days 30 posts. Also after the FTer hits 15 days 15 posts let an auto message come up informing the person about the existence of such a forum.
I agree, something like that would be a good idea. I've found that it still can take a lot of reading and a lot of trying to make deals work, even when the posts were much more open and detailed. Having a CC type restriction would certainly reduce the number of one-time opportunists who come to FT only because of a cross-post from somewhere else. 30 days/30 posts isn't too much; after all, most of us waiting 90?/180? days/posts to see CC or OMNI. I think as a community, we (includes me!) ought to try to be more conscientous about posting things like 'if you have any questions, PM or post here, DO NOT CALL!'. I know from experience, the 'stickies' can be overwhelming anyway, and you can't assume that someone who drops in to the forums reads entire threads, let alone the stickies. If we keep putting the reminders throughout the threads as we post, we're more likely to educate more folks before they make an ill-advised call that ends a mistake or worse, closes a loophole. |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 10581008)
30 days/30 posts isn't too much; after all, most of us waiting 90?/180? days/posts to see CC or OMNI.
. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:53 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.