![]() |
FareComprare Question
I'm getting pretty good at using ITA and FareCompare, however -
My question is - If I see a fare on FareCompare (WAS-LAX $219 on US currently) how do I see the routing/fare rules associated with it. When I click on it in FareCompare it takes me to a blank page. I'm looking for something like this, CO/UA Rules: Quote: 1. WAS-WAS/PHL/EWR/CLT/CLE-FLL 2. WAS-WAS/PHL/EWR/CLT/CLE-CLT-FLL 3. WAS-CLT-FLL 4. WAS-WAS/PHL/EWR/CLT/CLE-TPA/PNS/PBI/ORL/MIA/JAX/FMY/FLL- FLL 5. WAS-TPA/PNS/PBI/ORL/MIA/JAX/FMY/FLL-FLL 6. WAS-FLL I know I can go into ITA and plug in all the different possible routes through US hubs etc. - Seems like a waste if I can get the above rules.:cool: Thanks -Cap |
ExpertFlyer or KVS.
|
Thanks Bryan
Did you recognize the red text? :D
|
Originally Posted by Capita1ist
(Post 17333739)
Did you recognize the red text? :D
WAS-LAX is valid 10/31-11/2. 1. WAS-WAS/PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX 2. WAS-LAS-LAX 3. WAS-LAX |
Originally Posted by BryanIAH
(Post 17333803)
Yes. :D
WAS-LAX is valid 10/31-11/2. WAS-WAS/PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX How does that WAS-WAS work? I don't think there are flights between DCA/IAD/BWI are there? I've seen the same thing where LAX-LAX seems to be a possibility. Is it a remnant of when there were flights between co-terminals? |
Originally Posted by IggySD
(Post 17333842)
How does that WAS-WAS work? I don't think there are flights between DCA/IAD/BWI are there? I've seen the same thing where LAX-LAX seems to be a possibility. Is it a remnant of when there were flights between co-terminals? In other words a connection isn't required. |
Originally Posted by Capita1ist
(Post 17334504)
I could be wrong but I think that just means you could go direct from WAS-LAX or connect through one of the other options BOS/PHL/CLT etc.
In other words a connection isn't required. |
Originally Posted by IggySD
(Post 17333842)
I've noticed in a couple of fare rules you've posted something like:
WAS-WAS/PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX How does that WAS-WAS work? I don't think there are flights between DCA/IAD/BWI are there? I've seen the same thing where LAX-LAX seems to be a possibility. Is it a remnant of when there were flights between co-terminals? WAS-WAS/PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX PHL-WAS/PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX Of course this copy/paste routing rule style gets airlines into trouble sometimes like the DEN-LAX via CLE fare I posted last fall. |
Originally Posted by Capita1ist
(Post 17334504)
I could be wrong but I think that just means you could go direct from WAS-LAX or connect through one of the other options BOS/PHL/CLT etc.
In other words a connection isn't required. WAS-WAS/PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX The routings available just from that line of text are WAS-LAX, WAS-PHX-LAX, WAS-PHL-LAX, WAS-CLT-LAX, or WAS-BOS-LAX but it doesn't mean WAS-WAS-LAX? That seems counter intuitive to me. Why wouldn't it just be filed as two different routings? WAS-PHX/PHL/CLT/BOS-LAX WAS-LAX Ahh, and just after posting I read BryanIAH's response regarding the regional divisions. That makes sense if it's just a general string of airports that is added rather than created individually for each fare. Thanks! |
Yeah, the connections are often lumped together as one group. So for a PHL-CLT flight one might see PHL-WAS/PHL/CLT/NYC/BOS-PHL. Likewise, these groups aren't updated regularly, for example, STL is often still listed as a connecting point on many AA itineraries.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.