![]() |
I gotta agree, Chicago should have it's own titled forum, as should the other "consolidated" cities, unless there is difficulty getting a willing moderator.
https://philipwardlow.files.wordpres...nies-us-cc.jpg |
What an ignorant action to merge Chicago into "Midwest."
It reminds me of the unenlightened decisions of board members in condo associations.:rolleyes: |
^ Chicago is in the Midwest as far as I'm aware, is it not? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwes...tes#Definition)
Is it that you think Chicago should continue to have a separate forum? Or that Chicago's not actually in the Midwest? |
Originally Posted by backprop
(Post 27981698)
^ Chicago is in the Midwest as far as I'm aware, is it not? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwes...tes#Definition)
Is it that you think Chicago should continue to have a separate forum? Or that Chicago's not actually in the Midwest? East coast and west coast get the snowflake treatment. |
Originally Posted by ords
(Post 27982284)
Just as LA, SF and LV are in the west. Your point being?
East coast and west coast get the snowflake treatment. |
Originally Posted by JBord
(Post 27982615)
If the reason was to increase participation in Chicago-related posts, it's likely to have the opposite effect.
I guess I don't understand why the various forums had to be merged. It's not like IB is going to run out of bandwidth. Cheers. |
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
(Post 27982689)
I guess I don't understand why the various forums had to be merged. It's not like IB is going to run out of bandwidth.
|
I'll be voicing my opinion as well in the above linked thread too. When I need info about Chicago I don't want to sort through other smaller city threads and vice versa.
Originally Posted by milepig
(Post 27963133)
So both the Midwest and Chicago folk are unhappy. Great move all around.
I swear when it comes to making changes on FT the powers that be make their choices based on the max number of people they can piss off at once. |
:td::td::td::td::td:
Pain in the rear |
Originally Posted by ords
(Post 27982284)
Just as LA, SF and LV are in the west. Your point being?
East coast and west coast get the snowflake treatment. |
Originally Posted by backprop
(Post 28000112)
I wasn't making a point; I was asking a question, hence the second sentence of my post ending with a question mark.
I, for one, am also displeased with this particular decision. |
Originally Posted by gobluetwo
(Post 28018373)
Then the question was either intentionally obtuse or based on not having read any of the other comments in this thread.
I, for one, am also displeased with this particular decision. |
Me too
Originally Posted by ords
(Post 27959662)
I just voiced my concern as well.
|
I don't recall ever reading a thread in this forum until today, and I've been here a while. ;)
I'm Chicago bound next month, and opened the Midwest forum; then 'searched' Chicago. That move got me to this thread. :o Since I'm a New Yorker, I have an opinion. But since this isn't my neighborhood, I'll say this one thing... dumb move by IB. dh |
Originally Posted by glg
(Post 27961111)
According to the other thread, the "problem" is that the Midwest forum had "too few" posts, so they decided the solution was to put Chicago into it to "perk it up". I would encourage anyone else who thinks this is backward reasoning to join in the thread linked above.
For that matter, if post count is how we're judging, would make sense to combine West and Texas, or combine Pac NW and Alaska. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:58 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.