![]() |
I'm sure that's going to end well. :rolleyes:
|
For anyone interested, there will be an American 787 flying into MKE Sunday morning for a FAA proving flight.
|
Originally Posted by kannon99
(Post 24509395)
For anyone interested, there will be an American 787 flying into MKE Sunday morning for a FAA proving flight.
|
The Centre for Aviation has posted a new report on the Milwaukee airport. It is all stuff that we have talked about here in this forum, but it is interesting to see it in one report.
http://centreforaviation.com/analysi...rturing-212660 . |
Originally Posted by mizzou65201
(Post 24508745)
This is part of CBP outsourcing the enrollment process to a third-party provider called MorphoTrust instead of CBP employees doing it themselves. The "former location" is still the Milwaukee CBP office.
|
Originally Posted by mke9499
(Post 24512851)
MorphoTrust was handling the enrollments at the Layton Avenue location, when I enrolled there, earlier this year. CBP is located in a different building, near the airport.
|
I think the next phase of the baggage which includes claim #3 and a larger greeting area will open up this Friday.
|
Originally Posted by kannon99
(Post 24529207)
I think the next phase of the baggage which includes claim #3 and a larger greeting area will open up this Friday.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAkeZ50UsAAYvmX.jpg:medium Mitchell Airport's photo |
What gate will OneJet use? D27-29?!
|
Originally Posted by Wisconsin
(Post 24593824)
What gate will OneJet use? D27-29?!
Their ground handling needs will be minimal, with kiosk check in the norm. Not sure if they will contract with anyone to have a ticket counter presence or not. However somebody has to marshal the plane in and out, at minimum. I suppose in theory the pilots could have access to the gate and board their own flights, which would remove the need for a gate agent. As long as the kiosk works things are fine with no ticket counter, but you'd think they'd want some contingency if the kiosk fails. There's an 800 number but the person on the other end of the line can't issue a document to get a stranded passenger through security, for example. |
You would need one person at the ticket counter for check-in and baggage acceptance. After cut-off, that person may be the marshaller/gate agent.
Aren't D27/29 those podium jet bridges? |
Originally Posted by Starblazer
(Post 24594856)
You would need one person at the ticket counter for check-in and baggage acceptance. After cut-off, that person may be the marshaller/gate agent.
Aren't D27/29 those podium jet bridges? As for D27/28/29, those are the lower-level ground boarding gates along the stem of the D concourse. YX*/F9* had six walk-up ramps for the FRJ/CRJ/ERJ which operated there but the ramp is wide open now. The other side of the D concourse stem has upper-level fixed-pedestal jetways at D34, D36, D38. |
Originally Posted by knope2001
(Post 24596062)
There's no checked baggage service and kiosk-only check, so they don't necessarily need a ticket counter presence. I doubt they'd staff any of their own people, but perhaps they might pay someone for minimal support, at least underwing.
As for D27/28/29, those are the lower-level ground boarding gates along the stem of the D concourse. YX*/F9* had six walk-up ramps for the FRJ/CRJ/ERJ which operated there but the ramp is wide open now. The other side of the D concourse stem has upper-level fixed-pedestal jetways at D34, D36, D38. |
Originally Posted by WIRunner
(Post 24596164)
There's plenty of space in E as well, but it would make more sense to put them in D with the walkup gates. I know the mobile jet bridges are adjustable up and down, but it looks like they're flying fairly small jets. I'm still curious to see how this is going to work. They're focused on IND, the timing out of MKE is pretty.... bad.
My first hope is that once they get their feet wet on IND-MKE-IND they'll at least consider running IND-MKE-IND in the morning and again in the afternoon so day trips are workable both directions. Something like this would be workable: 0725 IND 0725 MKE 0745 MKE 0945 IND 1715 IND 1715 MKE 1740 MKE 1940 IND There's easily a half-dozen or more markets at MKE where this sort of service could work, perhaps quite a few more. But so are there from Columbus, from Jacksonville, from Pittsburgh, from Nashville, etc. Milwaukee travelers who go the night before can use the late afternoon MKE-IND nonstop but they'd likely find another way back to MKE. When traffic stats start showing up it will be interesting to see if southbound numbers are larger than northbound for that very reason. |
Originally Posted by knope2001
(Post 24596309)
Yeah, at least at first they are not much use for MKE-based travelers, and they already announced intentions to announce some IND-based expansion in late April. It may suggest they recognize opportunity here for future expansion.
My first hope is that once they get their feet wet on IND-MKE-IND they'll at least consider running IND-MKE-IND in the morning and again in the afternoon so day trips are workable both directions. Something like this would be workable: Would it make any sense for WN to offer service? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:44 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.